Obama Signs Bill Giving Him Armed Protection For Life

Comment #12

LiLSpeedy — Sun, 13 Jan 2013 04:48:45 GMT

You will be in jail and be someones butt buddy while I'm at home free to come and go as I please. Yes, that is real smart, shot first and ask questions later. I thought your kind of stupid died off...you must be a mutant inbred.

Comment #11

rdgrnr — Sat, 12 Jan 2013 22:47:30 GMT

You're afraid to do anything because of what you call "policies and procedures" and "serious legalities." Me? I'd shoot the mf'er first and worry about all that sh*t after he's dead and the kids are safe. You're a useless sack of sh*t who would let the kids die before you did anything because of "legalities." You're a typical, useless, Democrat trembling coward.... [ More ]

Comment #10

LiLSpeedy — Sat, 12 Jan 2013 20:51:23 GMT

Ramone, talk about something you have knowledge about...because when you don't you make a bigger ASS out of yourself.

Comment #9

rdgrnr — Sat, 12 Jan 2013 18:29:48 GMT

STFU lilspanky, you're a babbling idiot.

Comment #8

LiLSpeedy — Sat, 12 Jan 2013 04:17:44 GMT

Also, you are totally ignorant of School Board Policies and Procedures. There are serious legalities involved. Once school board members give permission to its employees to carry guns, they will liable for anything that happens as a result. Anything! To the child, the perp, and school employee.

Comment #7

LiLSpeedy — Sat, 12 Jan 2013 03:58:47 GMT

Here is an easy question for you idiot. What president is responsible for the US fighting two wars at the same time? Ahhhh! You're taking too long. GEORGE BUSH.

Comment #6

rdgrnr — Sat, 12 Jan 2013 01:15:00 GMT

Oh, so it might cost too much to protect the kids, huh? But it was ok to spend money bombing Libya and continuing the war in Afghanistan and giving Billions to the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt, right?

Comment #5

LiLSpeedy — Sat, 12 Jan 2013 00:39:01 GMT

He was a loony because what he was suggesting is not economically feasible. The POTUS will be protected regardless of whom the President may be.

Comment #4

rdgrnr — Sat, 12 Jan 2013 00:33:13 GMT

If schools are safer by being gun free zones, then wouldn't all federal buildings be safer as gun free zones too? Cuz afterall, we want our federal employees just as safe as our kids, right? And wouldn't police stations be safer too if they were gun free? Democrat logic, go figure.

Comment #3

rdgrnr — Sat, 12 Jan 2013 00:16:04 GMT

When the NRA guy recommended armed guards for our school kids, the Democrats said he was the "craziest man in America" and a "loon." Wouldn't it be just as "crazy" to put armed guards around Obama

Comment #2

LiLSpeedy — Sat, 12 Jan 2013 00:08:24 GMT

I didn't like George Bush as POTUS, but I could never hate him. I actually think that he is a descent man.

Comment #1

JAP69 — Fri, 11 Jan 2013 17:59:10 GMT

He knows he is a hated man for life.

Original Blog Entry: Obama Signs Bill Giving Him Armed Protection For Life

truesee — Fri, 11 Jan 2013 16:10:56 GMT

http://www.infowars.com/obama-signs-bill-giving-him-armed-protection-for-life/