POINTS OF LAW Which support and in turn are supported by the Constitution of the United States of Am https://blogs.lotterypost.com/jap69/2013/4/points-of-law-which-support-and-in-turn-are-s.htm JAP69's Blog: POINTS OF LAW Which support and in turn are supported by the Constitution of the United States of Am en-us Lottery Post RSS Generator Comment #6 https://blogs.lotterypost.com/jap69/2013/4/points-of-law-which-support-and-in-turn-are-s.htm#c106216 https://blogs.lotterypost.com/jap69/2013/4/points-of-law-which-support-and-in-turn-are-s.htm#c106216 Sun, 07 Apr 2013 01:33:15 GMT JAP69 Any new law which gets challenged in court should have an injunction issued forbidding implementing that law until the courts have ruled. This was the modus operandi at one time.<br />___________________________________________<br />Yep,<br />That is what the feds still do to the states with judges in their back pocket.

]]> JAP69 Comment #5 https://blogs.lotterypost.com/jap69/2013/4/points-of-law-which-support-and-in-turn-are-s.htm#c106211 https://blogs.lotterypost.com/jap69/2013/4/points-of-law-which-support-and-in-turn-are-s.htm#c106211 Sun, 07 Apr 2013 00:05:04 GMT GASMETERGUY <br />Today, with our liberal judges, new laws are allowed to be implemented even tho that law might be overturned in court. <br /><br />This is the problem. The solution is to find judges that uphold the law and not their political agendas. <br

]]> GASMETERGUY Comment #4 https://blogs.lotterypost.com/jap69/2013/4/points-of-law-which-support-and-in-turn-are-s.htm#c106203 https://blogs.lotterypost.com/jap69/2013/4/points-of-law-which-support-and-in-turn-are-s.htm#c106203 Sat, 06 Apr 2013 17:29:04 GMT rdgrnr And also, I think he's gonna keep trying to buy up all the ammo so we can't get any until he gets new laws in place restricting it.

]]> rdgrnr Comment #3 https://blogs.lotterypost.com/jap69/2013/4/points-of-law-which-support-and-in-turn-are-s.htm#c106202 https://blogs.lotterypost.com/jap69/2013/4/points-of-law-which-support-and-in-turn-are-s.htm#c106202 Sat, 06 Apr 2013 17:26:50 GMT rdgrnr And whether he uses convoluted interpretation or manipulation of the Constitution or tries to make us subject to a UN mandate, one thing is for sure - he's gonna do everything in his power to take our guns.

]]> rdgrnr Comment #2 https://blogs.lotterypost.com/jap69/2013/4/points-of-law-which-support-and-in-turn-are-s.htm#c106198 https://blogs.lotterypost.com/jap69/2013/4/points-of-law-which-support-and-in-turn-are-s.htm#c106198 Sat, 06 Apr 2013 15:09:28 GMT MADDOG10 Hey, that's opies dialogue isn't it?..

]]> MADDOG10 Comment #1 https://blogs.lotterypost.com/jap69/2013/4/points-of-law-which-support-and-in-turn-are-s.htm#c106197 https://blogs.lotterypost.com/jap69/2013/4/points-of-law-which-support-and-in-turn-are-s.htm#c106197 Sat, 06 Apr 2013 13:38:15 GMT JAP69 These intended new laws must be challenged before they become law. Once an intended new law becomes law it can take years for a challenge to the new law to work up thru the courts. And legislators know this.<br />A direct route is to have the legislator challenged for failure to uphold their oath of office.

]]> JAP69 Original Blog Entry: POINTS OF LAW Which support and in turn are supported by the Constitution of the United States of Am https://blogs.lotterypost.com/jap69/2013/4/points-of-law-which-support-and-in-turn-are-s.htm https://blogs.lotterypost.com/jap69/2013/4/points-of-law-which-support-and-in-turn-are-s.htm Sat, 06 Apr 2013 13:21:31 GMT JAP69 ___________________________________________

POINTS OF LAW

Which support and in turn are supported

by the Constitution of the United States of America

http://mhkeehn.tripod.com/ptsoflaw.pdf

excerpt:

1. Where the meaning of the Constitution is clear and unambiguous, there can be no resort to

construction to attribute to the founders a purpose or intent not manifest in its letter. Norris v.

Baltimore, 172, MD 667; 192 A 531.0

3. All laws which are repugnant to the Constitution are null and void. Marbury v. Madison, 5

US (2 Cranch) 137, 174, 176, (1803)

_____________________________________

Comment by jap69

Is the second ammendment clear in its meaning?

Are these gun control laws repugnant to the constitution?

A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.

... [ More ]

]]> Blog Entry JAP69 https://www.lotterypost.com/blogentry/77498