<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
	<channel>
		<title>Nancy Pelosi: Hillary Clinton &#x27;would win&#x27; in 2016</title>
		<link>https://blogs.lotterypost.com/truesee/2013/6/nancy-pelosi-hillary-clinton-would-win-in.htm</link>
		<atom:link href="https://www.lotterypost.com/rss/blogcomments/80568" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<description>truesee's Blog: Nancy Pelosi: Hillary Clinton &#x27;would win&#x27; in 2016</description>
		<dc:language>en-us</dc:language>
		<generator>Lottery Post RSS Generator</generator>
		<item>
			<title>Comment #4</title>
			<link>https://blogs.lotterypost.com/truesee/2013/6/nancy-pelosi-hillary-clinton-would-win-in.htm#c110874</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://blogs.lotterypost.com/truesee/2013/6/nancy-pelosi-hillary-clinton-would-win-in.htm#c110874</guid>
			<pubDate>Sat, 29 Jun 2013 23:13:28 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>lilluv</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>One thing for sure the Dems can win state wide and all over the country,but you sure can&#x27;t say the same for the Pubs and Teabaggers.</p>]]></description>
			<category>lilluv</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Comment #3</title>
			<link>https://blogs.lotterypost.com/truesee/2013/6/nancy-pelosi-hillary-clinton-would-win-in.htm#c110867</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://blogs.lotterypost.com/truesee/2013/6/nancy-pelosi-hillary-clinton-would-win-in.htm#c110867</guid>
			<pubDate>Sat, 29 Jun 2013 22:48:40 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>LiLSpeedy</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>I sure hope Mrs. Clinton run in 2016...she would win and make the repubs and tea partiers pout for EIGHT MORE YEARS. LOL</p>]]></description>
			<category>LiLSpeedy</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Comment #2</title>
			<link>https://blogs.lotterypost.com/truesee/2013/6/nancy-pelosi-hillary-clinton-would-win-in.htm#c110859</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://blogs.lotterypost.com/truesee/2013/6/nancy-pelosi-hillary-clinton-would-win-in.htm#c110859</guid>
			<pubDate>Sat, 29 Jun 2013 18:52:27 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>emilyg</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Her brain is shrinking from all the botox.</p>]]></description>
			<category>emilyg</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Comment #1</title>
			<link>https://blogs.lotterypost.com/truesee/2013/6/nancy-pelosi-hillary-clinton-would-win-in.htm#c110852</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://blogs.lotterypost.com/truesee/2013/6/nancy-pelosi-hillary-clinton-would-win-in.htm#c110852</guid>
			<pubDate>Sat, 29 Jun 2013 16:08:58 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>MADDOG10</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Smoke another doobie Nancy, and call your pharmacist in the morning..!!!</p>]]></description>
			<category>MADDOG10</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Original Blog Entry: Nancy Pelosi: Hillary Clinton &#x27;would win&#x27; in 2016</title>
			<link>https://blogs.lotterypost.com/truesee/2013/6/nancy-pelosi-hillary-clinton-would-win-in.htm</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://blogs.lotterypost.com/truesee/2013/6/nancy-pelosi-hillary-clinton-would-win-in.htm</guid>
			<pubDate>Sat, 29 Jun 2013 01:26:06 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>truesee</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>http://www.politico.com/story/2013/06/hillary-clinton-2016-election-nancy-pelosi-93549.html<br /><br /></p>]]></description>
			<category>Blog Entry</category>
			<category>truesee</category>
			<wfw:comment>https://www.lotterypost.com/blogentry/80568</wfw:comment>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

