<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
	<channel>
		<title>Making Faces? Face Make-Up software.</title>
		<link>/blogentry/80649</link>
		<atom:link href="https://www.lotterypost.com/rss/blogcomments/80649" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<description>MonEl's Blog: Making Faces? Face Make-Up software.</description>
		<dc:language>en-us</dc:language>
		<generator>Lottery Post RSS Generator</generator>
		<item>
			<title>Original Blog Entry: Making Faces? Face Make-Up software.</title>
			<link>/blogentry/80649</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">/blogentry/80649</guid>
			<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jul 2013 17:51:05 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>MonEl</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>The old kind of drawing as was seen on the movies and or on the T.V, very cheap looking:<br /><br />I guess that it might still be used somewhere.<br /><br />Some software they sell for about $4, 000.00 or more.<br /><br />Those who can draw good by hand can do much better and cheaper.<br /><br />------------------------------------------------------------------------<br /><br />This needs some improvement also, I don&#x27;t see a way of putting any hair on it.<br /><br />Also as good as it is, it and it is, it does need to have more control of the elements that make-up a face.<br /><br />And you can&#x27;t put hats, hair, Etc on the faces and also as I said it needs even a few more controls of the features of the faces than it already has.<br /><br />As you can see I am new at making faces and I am not so good at it, so far anyway.<br /><br />Some other softwares are quicker at making stuff like this, but we can&#x27;t get them and if we could it might cost way too much money to buy such softwares.<br /><br />And what about the eyes? I so no way of making the eyes.<br /><br />This is a trial that I am using, but the full version might maybe be exactly the same, I am not sure.<br /><br />... &#x5b;&#xa0;<a href="/blogentry/80649">More</a>&#xa0;&#x5d;</p>]]></description>
			<category>Blog Entry</category>
			<category>MonEl</category>
			<wfw:comment>https://www.lotterypost.com/blogentry/80649</wfw:comment>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

