By adjusting my mathematical assumptions to mimic graphical movements of my imaginary logarithm, which travers the entire database, based on the simple logic that nothing ever tried could predict lottery winners accurately. So here are my basic assumptions:

1) That there are only 6 balls drawn at each game; and that there are spread over 6 columns (Excel-based).

2) Each column has a maximum of the total number of main balls (75 in megamillions and 59 in powerball, for an example), each with equal significance.

3) I have used Excel in my model, and within that, the assumption is that my logarithm defines the positions of six main intervals, spread over 30 rows. The starting point of my model begins with the basic spread of the 75 balls downwards, from column A to F (or 1 to 6). The moneyball position has not been given a special significance and is treated as being equal to the rest of the numbers.

4)At the end, my model has been based on logarithmic variations, with the main assumption being that at any given time, the game can only draw on the set of intervals at the beginning of my database, on top, made up of 30 rows, and of these, only 6 rows are active, at all games. The intervals are in total 6, which repeat over and over thoughout the database, but the first set is significant. These intervals are specific to a panel (made up of 6 rows, whose values differ).

5)So far, after testing and adjusting my method, over many months, I came up with the following: That each number drawn has variants defined by its original value, at the interval (I call it a 'hinge'), plus its present value and adjusted by its future p....

[ More ]

]]>