Why Are There No News Helicopters Over Ferguson?

Comment #3

Lucky Loser — Thu, 21 Aug 2014 00:07:59 GMT

<br />May be she said to him, "Oh, no you didn't." He's landing haymakers on this woman. Any takers? What about the choke hold on a guy that also clearly has his hands up and facing forward? Yeah, he was pissed 'cause the cops always harass him. Yeah, he was moving untaxed cigarettes. But, an ILLEGAL CHOKE HOLD while he had his hands up? Thought I was gonna let these two slide, huh? All cops are great and do everything right all the time, huh? The cop meant no harm by implementing a CHOKE HOLD w... [ More ]

Comment #2

Lucky Loser — Wed, 20 Aug 2014 22:23:45 GMT

<br />Now, for something slightly off-topic and to follow up on my last reply to the person in question. Paul Ryan was on Fox & Friends and was reminded about his comments on 'inner-city (black)' males. They played his directs and he refuses to comment on Ferguson. So, my question to you my 'dear' is this: "Were the anchors on your favorite conservative channel AGITATORS for asking him about Ferguson?" I mean, he had no issue calling out that these same types of people are where the inner city i... [ More ]

Comment #1

JAP69 — Wed, 20 Aug 2014 19:54:03 GMT

The police are trying to control a situation and news media is dumping on the police for using tactics for crowd control.

Original Blog Entry: Why Are There No News Helicopters Over Ferguson?

truesee — Wed, 20 Aug 2014 10:59:09 GMT

http://reason.com/blog/2014/08/19/why-are-there-no-news-helicopters-over-f