The dishonesty of sharing

Comment #8

Rick G — Mon, 21 Aug 2006 03:45:24 GMT

That was exactly my point. Sharing is a two-way street but the nefarious among us like to keep it a one-way street and in their direction. Good one about "Flushing"...lol...no, I'm not from there...but I've rodded out enough sewer lines to think so

Comment #7

justxploring — Sun, 20 Aug 2006 23:15:28 GMT

I love your toilet paper analogy. You're not from Flushing are you? (groan

Comment #6

Rick G — Sat, 19 Aug 2006 04:32:11 GMT

I just caught your reply. We are talking about the same person. But they won't read this because it is only words, not free lottery information. Sometimes I wonder if there's not a lottery systems book in the making? A compendium so to speak. Makes you leery of posting things here anymore. Is our publicly offered free information being compiled for their own benefit for sale? No wonder there isn't much cooperation on these forums anymore.

Comment #5

JAP69 — Sat, 12 Aug 2006 15:06:51 GMT

I have seen a long time forum member from maybells and here tout about sharing. Posted on the forum about sharing systems. I have not seen this member share anything. Give me, give me, give me. And screw you.

Comment #4

pacattack05 — Fri, 11 Aug 2006 22:33:34 GMT

Eat your heart out Criss Angel.....LOL

Comment #3

Rick G — Fri, 11 Aug 2006 22:26:00 GMT

Thanks, Todd.

Comment #2

Todd — Fri, 11 Aug 2006 22:17:13 GMT

The word "sharing" is certainly not censored. I struck it in there for you.

Comment #1

Rick G — Fri, 11 Aug 2006 20:07:55 GMT

Unless the word "sharing" is banned, the proper title of the final edit was supposed to be "The dishonesty of sharing".

Original Blog Entry: The dishonesty of sharing

Rick G — Fri, 11 Aug 2006 19:35:42 GMT