<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
	<channel>
		<title>Scientific Games appeals N.J. Lottery&#x27;s award to GTECH</title>
		<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/news/123417</link>
		<atom:link href="https://www.lotterypost.com/rss/news/123417" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<description>Lottery Post News Story: Scientific Games appeals N.J. Lottery&#x27;s award to GTECH</description>
		<dc:language>en-us</dc:language>
		<generator>Lottery Post RSS Generator</generator>
		<item>
			<title>Comment #10</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/news/123417/505890</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/news/123417/505890</guid>
			<pubDate>Sun, 25 Dec 2005 19:12:43 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>MADDOG10</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>it&#x27;s not a matter of whether or not they change, it&#x27;s about fair practice of the bidding system. They (State) need to look into this matter and see why they gave away 32 million and why?I think their is something starting to smell on this one...</p>]]></description>
			<category>MADDOG10</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Comment #9</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/news/123417/505881</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/news/123417/505881</guid>
			<pubDate>Sun, 25 Dec 2005 18:51:34 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>CASH Only</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>At least you played Ca$h WinFall instead of Megabucks. I played $6 CW and won nothing.</p>]]></description>
			<category>CASH Only</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Comment #8</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/news/123417/505683</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/news/123417/505683</guid>
			<pubDate>Sun, 25 Dec 2005 07:51:50 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>JimmySand9</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Well in GTech&#x27;s defense, I will say that the MA Lottery is still stuck in the past too. Keep in mind that it still has those  Void If Removed  sections on scratch-off tickets, which would imply manual validation. How long has MA had those terminals</p>]]></description>
			<category>JimmySand9</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Comment #7</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/news/123417/505677</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/news/123417/505677</guid>
			<pubDate>Sun, 25 Dec 2005 07:04:16 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Bingo Long</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Another bad GTECH experience this weekend.  I went in to buy $100 worth of cash winfall tix, and the paper was near the end of the roll.  Several paper jams later, the machine had printed $50 worth of tix and had registered a total of $110.  Give me a break.</p>]]></description>
			<category>Bingo Long</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Comment #6</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/news/123417/489605</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/news/123417/489605</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2005 17:47:19 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>CASH Only</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>My favorite Connecticut store is not far from the state line. They sold CT&#x27;s first Powerball jackpot winner in 1997. They used to have two machines, but now just one.</p>]]></description>
			<category>CASH Only</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Comment #5</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/news/123417/489024</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/news/123417/489024</guid>
			<pubDate>Tue, 29 Nov 2005 15:32:36 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Drivedabizness</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Hey - where do I sign up on the SGI payroll?  I mean come on, what a load of crap. I Try tallking to a lottery retailer in Connecticut.  They&#x27;ll tell you how happy they are with their lottery terminal AND the service they get for it.</p>]]></description>
			<category>Drivedabizness</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Comment #4</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/news/123417/486945</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/news/123417/486945</guid>
			<pubDate>Fri, 25 Nov 2005 21:02:51 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>CASH Only</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>A lottery terminal catch fire? It must have spit out an annuity-only ticket</p>]]></description>
			<category>CASH Only</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Comment #3</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/news/123417/486012</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/news/123417/486012</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 24 Nov 2005 09:20:29 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Bingo Long</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>I play both companies a bit (Gtech in MA, SG in NH) and I think Scientific Games makes a far superior lottery terminal.  Gtech is still stuck in the past, with dot-matrix printers that don&#x27;t print well when they get hot.  They&#x27;re still readable, but the bar codes can&#x27;t scan.  I&#x27;ve seen a Gtech machine in Michigan catch fire from the printer head getting too hot after printing 50 tickets, a Gtech machine in MA start smoking after 80, and another Gtech machine in MA get a printer jam, charging me... &#x5b;&#xa0;<a href="https://www.lotterypost.com/news/123417/486012">More</a>&#xa0;&#x5d;</p>]]></description>
			<category>Bingo Long</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Comment #2</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/news/123417/485579</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/news/123417/485579</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 23 Nov 2005 17:22:13 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>CASH Only</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>NY uses Gtech. I have no problem with Gtech, it&#x27;s the NY Lottery itself I&#x27;m critical of.</p>]]></description>
			<category>CASH Only</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Comment #1</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/news/123417/485465</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/news/123417/485465</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 23 Nov 2005 14:05:37 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Chewie</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>I am unaware of retailer viewpoints, but from a player viewpoint, the system works.  Leave it alone.  Every time they change things, it tends to go downhill.</p>]]></description>
			<category>Chewie</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Scientific Games appeals N.J. Lottery&#x27;s award to GTECH</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/news/123417</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/news/123417</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 23 Nov 2005 13:30:09 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Lottery Post</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Overbid by nearly $32 million in its unsuccessful attempt to get the state&#x27;s lottery contract, Scientific Games filed a protest Tuesday claiming officials skewed the bid proposals to keep its current operator.Earlier this month, the state announced its plans to give GTech Corp., the current lottery operator, a new five-year contract, even though it wasn&#x27;t the low bidder. The state justified the decision by saying GTech offered a more secure and reliable system and outscored Scientific Games on a... &#x5b;&#xa0;<a href="https://www.lotterypost.com/news/123417">More</a>&#xa0;&#x5d;</p>]]></description>
			<category>Lottery Post</category>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

