<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
	<channel>
		<title>UK online lottery company fizzles</title>
		<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/news/135914</link>
		<atom:link href="https://www.lotterypost.com/rss/news/135914" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<description>Lottery Post News Story: UK online lottery company fizzles</description>
		<dc:language>en-us</dc:language>
		<generator>Lottery Post RSS Generator</generator>
		<item>
			<title>Comment #3</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/news/135914/627210</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/news/135914/627210</guid>
			<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jun 2006 21:22:21 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Rip Snorter</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Quote: Originally posted by LOTTOMIKE on June 16, 2006 i definitely agree with you there jack.also the UK has different laws than we do here for online gaming.<br /><br />Mike:<br /><br />So it would seem.  If it&#x27;s legal there:<br /><br />A private lottery that doesn&#x27;t try any monkey tricks or shell games with the money,<br /><br />just paying out in cash value minus, say, 20 percent operating expenses and profit,<br /><br />ought to be a license to mint money for  the owners and a boon for lottery players.<br /><br />So, you gotta ask you... &#x5b;&#xa0;<a href="https://www.lotterypost.com/news/135914/627210">More</a>&#xa0;&#x5d;</p>]]></description>
			<category>Rip Snorter</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Comment #2</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/news/135914/627024</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/news/135914/627024</guid>
			<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jun 2006 17:12:49 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>LOTTOMIKE</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>i definitely agree with you there jack.also the UK has different laws than we do here for online gaming.</p>]]></description>
			<category>LOTTOMIKE</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Comment #1</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/news/135914/620355</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/news/135914/620355</guid>
			<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jun 2006 14:54:40 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Rip Snorter</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>People don&#x27;t play the national lottery to give money to good causes. If they want to give, they put a pound in the charity box.<br /><br />Contrary to a long history of contradictory evidence, there&#x27;s someone in the UK who has a brain.<br /><br />Jack</p>]]></description>
			<category>Rip Snorter</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>UK online lottery company fizzles</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/news/135914</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/news/135914</guid>
			<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jun 2006 13:18:26 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Lottery Post</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Editor: Lottery Post previously reported that the creators of this &#x27;alternative&#x27; UK lottery had allegedly enriched themselves more than the charities the lottery is supposed to support.<br /><br />Are the owners squeezing out the profits and then leaving the company and its stockholders in the lurch?<br /><br />It started out as a small but brazen challenger to the national lottery, hoping to capitalize on a stream of damaging stories that have caricatured many of the good causes benefiting from lottery cas... &#x5b;&#xa0;<a href="https://www.lotterypost.com/news/135914">More</a>&#xa0;&#x5d;</p>]]></description>
			<category>Lottery Post</category>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

