US House on the brink of taking away online gambling rights

Comment #30

LOTTOMIKE — Thu, 13 Jul 2006 08:13:03 GMT

i agree littleoldlady.while the bastards drive their mercedes and eat at upscale restaurants then head to their million dollar penthouses i do think this makes them out of touch with the everyday american who just likes everday things like a good cooked meal,couple of beers and something to gamble on every now and then.if they could tax me going to the bathroom i bet they would.me vote??? i wouldn't vote for none of these sleazy creeps.they are all the same.smile and lie to your face while swea... [ More ]

Comment #29

Littleoldlady — Thu, 13 Jul 2006 07:11:57 GMT

My, my. I am so impressed with our government officials. They are doing their very best to manipulate where and how I spend my money. If they get rid of internet gambling..I betcha that other forms will be back shortly. I remember number games played in your own neighborhood. They can't legislate morality and why they are still trying is beyond me. I wonder how many of our tax dollars they used with this garbage. We have a full plate with the costs of the war, veteran's care, illegal al... [ More ]

Comment #28

Just6ntlc — Wed, 12 Jul 2006 19:03:11 GMT

If online gambling rights are eliminated, I would be happy. For example, after poker professional Mike "The Mouth" Matusow won $1 million at 2005 WSOP main event, he spent about half of his winnings gambling online. Then his parents took it the internet away from him.

Comment #27

KY Floyd — Wed, 12 Jul 2006 18:21:13 GMT

what's to stop Americans from using ISP's that originate outside of the US?

Well, for starters there's the way the internet works. If you follow your phone line or your cable you'll find that the other end isn't in a different country. I suppose you could subscribe to a foreign ISP's satelite connection if you don't mind the long distance charges for the uplink over phone lines. If you do manage to get service through a foreign provider you'll need one that's willing to violate the US laws... [ More ]

Comment #26

KY Floyd — Wed, 12 Jul 2006 18:13:45 GMT

I disagree that it's the casino lobby protecting their interests. I know that it's close to the same thing, but I think it's politicians protecting their campaign contributions. As far as getting rid of the republicans, that's only half of the battle. There are about as many democrats, too. What we really need is a thorough house cleaning (the bad pun is unintended; the senate needs to go as well), and a voting population that's informed and doesn't just send the incumbents back to finance thei... [ More ]

Comment #25

time*treat — Wed, 12 Jul 2006 00:17:01 GMT

Can I get a moat and drawbridge with my gun turret and walls?

In other news, my state is offering lifetime gun licenses.

Pay $100 and give 'em your info.

Anyone care to guess what's next? Can you say U.K. and Australia-style gun ban

Comment #24

cps10 — Tue, 11 Jul 2006 20:16:05 GMT

I think that it won't pass anyway...the Senate is in no hurry to even table this stupid bill.

Comment #23

Todd — Tue, 11 Jul 2006 20:14:50 GMT

Brad,

I know that you're a big liberal, and you can't stand conservatives, but that is just an out right lie. In case you don't get it , it is BOTH Democrats and Repblicans who are in on this stupid bill, and they are both to blame.

In fact, the guy who wrote the biggest dissenting view is a Republican from Texas.

I guess I'm just smart enough to know that there is a big difference between congress coming unhinged on this stupid bill, and something as fundemental as protecting our co... [ More ]

Comment #22

thinreality — Tue, 11 Jul 2006 19:45:53 GMT

This is exactly what they want: to control what you do. The US government and the lobbyists who hang around Washington are extremely paternalistic. I agree with you, Saleo. Count me in as another grown adult who can decide what is in my own best interests.

It's true, there will always be people who choose their pursuits regardless of what is written on the books in D.C.

Comment #21

Three2001 — Tue, 11 Jul 2006 19:14:19 GMT

HR 4411 is passing right now. Should we play that number while we can? This CNN Pipeline is great with no access to TV at work. You can watch these idiots at their work.

Comment #20

BevsPicks — Tue, 11 Jul 2006 18:27:50 GMT

Quote: Originally posted by Bradly_60 on July 11, 2006 I bet it is just the casino lobby trying to protect their interests. I think it is a bunch of BS. If it does pass there will be many legal challenges.

It seems a lot lately that the government of the US is really trying to restict the rights of the people. It is kind of actually scary....we need to get rid of the Republican majority in the fall before we lose anymore rights.

Brad

I agree.

Comment #19

BevsPicks — Tue, 11 Jul 2006 18:25:10 GMT

As I speak right now the bill is getting beat down pretty bad. With 5 minutes to go. The vote is 51 Nay and 20 yea on the 4410. That's a good sign.

Comment #18

DoubleDown — Tue, 11 Jul 2006 17:55:31 GMT

We can't take much more, that's for sure....

DD

Comment #17

jim695 — Tue, 11 Jul 2006 17:48:46 GMT

Whenever someone says, It's not about the money, you can be assured of one thing: It's about the money.

I am a registered Republican, but my party seems determined now to transform this country into the New-Age Nazi Germany. Come November, I'm casting my vote for an independent candidate. This is more effective than simply not voting, as it takes away a vote from each of the two choices we have. Not that it's much of a choice. Do you want to elect this crook, or would you rather have this... [ More ]

Comment #16

konane — Tue, 11 Jul 2006 15:41:58 GMT

Has anyone considered this may be a diversionary technique to draw our attention away from the real issue which is unfettered immigration (invasion), and implementing the treaty which combines Mexico, US and Canada into one large territory without borders????

Democrats overwhelmingly have voted FOR open borders and FOR amnesty as congressional votes have clearly demonstrated.

A diversion is created when someone wants to slide something through that wouldn't be allowed under close scruti... [ More ]

Comment #15

Peach3 $treet — Tue, 11 Jul 2006 15:17:26 GMT

This bill is up for debate on CSPAN1 right now.

It would appear that it's passage in the House is considered a done deal, since Democrats (....praise those who truly care about America's working men and women!!....) have been using their rare opportunity for extended floor time to argue for an up or down vote on increasing the minimum wage, for the first time in 9 years.

Let's hope the waste-of-legislator's-time internet gambling bill dies in the Senate.

Comment #14

LOTTOMIKE — Tue, 11 Jul 2006 13:33:55 GMT

the united states is lost in a lot of different ways.think they'd want to block something like child porn or fight crime.but no this is very important.the whole country has been heading in the wrong direction for a while.too many important decisions made by the wrong people........

Comment #13

Bradly_60 — Tue, 11 Jul 2006 13:25:24 GMT

I bet it is just the casino lobby trying to protect their interests. I think it is a bunch of BS. If it does pass there will be many legal challenges.

It seems a lot lately that the government of the US is really trying to restict the rights of the people. It is kind of actually scary....we need to get rid of the Republican majority in the fall before we lose anymore rights.

Brad

Comment #12

Saleo Paleo — Tue, 11 Jul 2006 12:30:40 GMT

Irregardless of what they do,we shall and will find a way to play if we want,my father has been dead for several yrs now and I'll be damned if they are going to take his place and tell me what I can spend my Us Dollar on.

Comment #11

moxie — Tue, 11 Jul 2006 06:48:56 GMT

This is shameful and unconstitutional. Should any form of regulation of the Internet be imposed by Congress, gambling or otherwise, then I say what's to stop Americans from using ISP's that originate outside of the US?

Implementing an ISP based in a Costa Rica, Grand Cayman or Geneva is TOTALLY possible. There are only about 10 backbone networks in the world and ISP's rent connections from those companies and sell the service to us. Anyone can start an ISP. I'd like to see them just try... [ More ]

Comment #10

BobP — Tue, 11 Jul 2006 05:48:36 GMT

If this bill gets passed they should stop advertising the U.S. as a free country where the people decide how things are done. BobP

Comment #9

orangeman — Tue, 11 Jul 2006 04:44:56 GMT

This is another crazy idea that won't fly. If it does and they manage to shut down gambling web sites, they should also block all adult sites, too. Porn is more destructive than online gambling.

Orangeman

Comment #8

time*treat — Tue, 11 Jul 2006 04:40:29 GMT

Ron Paul is one of the few elected officials with any sense. Not just for this, but for his positions on many things. I'll be sad to see him go. If our benefactors want to enforce something, try our southern border. If they want to stamp out something, try Osama. Ahh, but that's too much like REAL work.

Comment #7

four4me — Tue, 11 Jul 2006 03:41:06 GMT

are they going to tell us we can't send a money order to the gambling sites. NOT

Comment #6

GoldenEgg — Tue, 11 Jul 2006 02:42:15 GMT

I'll bet those sites will post a "Play Agreement Declaration" message where the player will have to check the "Agree" before they play, then pay via "Tel-Check", money orders or even FedEx Cash to the address that will be posted below. ROFLLLLLLLLLL

Comment #5

konane — Tue, 11 Jul 2006 02:20:58 GMT

If passed, I smell plenty of legal challenges probably all the way to the Supreme Court. Maybe the senate will kill or at least table it indefinitely.

Comment #4

JAP69 — Tue, 11 Jul 2006 02:03:19 GMT

[The government doesn't care if you lose your house]

You are right.

Do not pay your real estate taxes within a time frame and they will sell it out from under you in a skinny minute.

Put you out in the street. they will

Comment #3

bellyache — Tue, 11 Jul 2006 01:57:59 GMT

I think banning credit cards from being used will make it hard for gamblers to play, but I'm sure there will be ways around this.

John Kindt, a business professor at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign who has studied the issue, calls the Internet "the crack cocaine" of gambling.

"There are no needle marks. There's no alcohol on the breath. You just click the mouse and lose your house," he said.

Whatever. The government doesn't care if you lose your house. They're just upset... [ More ]

Comment #2

Jimiam — Tue, 11 Jul 2006 00:47:13 GMT

Plus, you know it might make me a mite nervous. Plus, ever since they let me out ot the nervous hospital they said don't get nervous.

Ha ha ha ha, I'm so darn funny!

Jimiam

Comment #1

Jimiam — Tue, 11 Jul 2006 00:23:45 GMT

I should probably steer away from these topics, they tend to get me riled up and flustered. I m usually hard to get riled up.

Jimiam

US House on the brink of taking away online gambling rights

Lottery Post — Tue, 11 Jul 2006 00:16:29 GMT

Gamblers who prefer their laptops to blackjack tables won't like what Congress is doing. On Tuesday, the House plans to vote on a bill that would ban credit cards for paying online bets and could padlock gambling Web sites.

The legislation would clarify existing law to spell out that it is illegal to gamble online.

To enforce that ban, the bill would prohibit credit cards and other payment forms, such as electronic transfers, from being used to settle online wagers. It also would give la... [ More ]