Judge tosses wife's Lotto suit -- for now

Comment #12

tntea — Fri, 30 May 2008 15:26:09 GMT

Most of the population want anything and everything free; because they deserve it. A chance comes along and they grab for the shiney brass ring. If not that, they want free medicine, they want free medical care for themselves, they want a paycheck every week for sitting around and existing, they want gasoline to be cheap, but will scream and holler if oil is pumped from some place thousands of miles away and they will never see it. They want oil company's to lower their prices, but refuse to let... [ More ]

Comment #11

MeFirstYouLast — Thu, 22 May 2008 19:09:24 GMT

You've statement have proven over and over you are not a greedy person. That puts you 180 degrees out of phase from a large percentage of the population.

Most of the population want anything and everything free; because they deserve it. A chance comes along and they grab for the shiney brass ring. If not that, they want free medicine, they want free medical care for themselves, they want a paycheck every week for sitting around and existing, they want gasoline to be cheap, but will scream an... [ More ]

Comment #10

tntea — Sun, 18 May 2008 18:01:17 GMT

My Question

Why would she want to have anything to do with this person?

I would divorce him and move on.

Comment #9

justxploring — Sun, 18 May 2008 16:37:09 GMT

Sanda Dee writes: Why didn't he claim his part anonymously?

Actually, he did everything possible in the State of Florida from what I can see. It's never been clear if he had already filed for divorce before he won, so I am surprised by the judge's ruling. IMO the lawsuit could possibly end up costing nearly as much as the prize. So I agree that he should have paid her off, but apparently there is a lot of animosity between them. I'm not sure what the lawyers will get paid, but 1/3 of the... [ More ]

Comment #8

mjwinsmith — Sun, 18 May 2008 16:30:30 GMT

Good one, LOL

Comment #7

Sandra Dee — Sun, 18 May 2008 14:56:27 GMT

1) I don't know of couples feeding each other the wedding cake with the KNIFE!!

2) why didn't he claim his part anonymously?

3) I note that he is stingy [insert DUH here] but dayummm! he could have merely said he won a couple of thousands dollars and bought her something nice along with dinner, she would have been good ..

4) He should pay her half for his stupidity! what kind of man disconnects the phone [girls + phone = lifeline] and turned off the t.v.!? what about all those Bravo sh... [ More ]

Comment #6

liberal47 — Sun, 18 May 2008 13:48:31 GMT

LOL! That picture should be titled Little Richard mates with Amorosa, a merger made in ............

Comment #5

ThatScaryChick — Sun, 18 May 2008 05:21:03 GMT

I wonder if she will be able to prove that she should have a share of the money. It should be interesting to see what happens.

Comment #4

TheGameGrl — Sun, 18 May 2008 03:07:54 GMT

For better or worse, she is about to get the worse case of reality check . Interesting to see how her lawyers will dazzle the system in favor of her allegations.

Comment #3

JackpotWanna — Sun, 18 May 2008 02:35:36 GMT

wow! I can't believe it

Comment #2

psykomo — Sat, 17 May 2008 23:33:44 GMT

???? where is the LUV?

Why? do people think $$

all the DARN TIME $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$?????????

LOL

PSYKOMO

Comment #1

DC81 — Sat, 17 May 2008 23:29:50 GMT

That wedding photo is creepy, yet hilarious at the same time...

Should have had a prenup...

Judge tosses wife's Lotto suit -- for now

Lottery Post — Sat, 17 May 2008 22:46:48 GMT

A Miami-Dade judge on Thursday said the wife of a lottery winner cannot go forward with a lawsuit against her spouse until she proves the money should belong to her.

She has no identifiable legal rights at this time, Circuit Judge Jennifer D. Bailey said. Where does the law say you automatically have a right to participate in the proceeds?

Bailey temporarily dismissed the lawsuit Donna Campbell filed against her husband, Arnim Ramdass, an American Airlines mechanic who hit a $19 millio... [ More ]