Scientific Games sued a second time by Gameologist

Comment #3

Grovel — Sat, 08 Aug 2009 23:21:22 GMT

XD, these are the same guys who are going to supply the Arkansas lottery.

Comment #2

KY Floyd — Sat, 08 Aug 2009 05:41:17 GMT

If you think it was clearly a theft of intellectual property you clearly didn't understand what you read. This isn't a news article, it's a one-sided press release from a law firm that's attempting to publicize their client's allegations. As near as I can tell from this and their previous press release, their claim is strictly related to trademark infringement for uses of the word bling . Unfortunately for them, bling and bling bling were in popular usage well before they decided to get their tr... [ More ]

Comment #1

Littleoldlady — Fri, 07 Aug 2009 21:28:11 GMT

They need to win this lawsuit against Scientific games. It was clearly theft of intellectual property. I don't know why big companies think they can just steam roll over smaller ones. There is enough money for all. Seems like Scientific Games is very greedy, corrupt and manipulative and will stop at nothing to win those contracts.

Scientific Games sued a second time by Gameologist

Lottery Post — Fri, 07 Aug 2009 17:44:22 GMT

Gameologist, a New Jersey based and minority-owned small business, filed a lawsuit in New York Supreme Court against Scientific Games, for infringement of trademark. This is the second such lawsuit that Gameologist has filed against Scientific for its infringement on the BLING trademark.

Gameologist developed the lottery scratch-off game BLING BLING and registered a trademark with the United States Patent and Trademark Office in 2003.

At that time, Gameologist met with representatives of S... [ More ]