Lottery 'winner' sues for $63M

Comment #20

jacaesar — Thu, 25 Dec 2003 11:00:33 GMT

I have evidence that will prove that the lottery officials are involved so they had to think of something. But because I made them provide me with something in writing, I can prove that they participated in the corruption.

Comment #19

jacaesar — Thu, 25 Dec 2003 10:47:14 GMT

I feel like I have been treated just a bad as the Iraqi's. Our soldiers were fighting to free Iraqi's from evil. However, I'm in the U.S. and I'm the victim of just as much or even more evil. But I don't know if I have anyone to rescue me since the U.S. is my attacker. They are also trying to surpress any media because they can't have the corruption at the lottery exposed.

Comment #18

jacaesar — Thu, 25 Dec 2003 10:36:55 GMT

My mistake was notifying politicians of what was going on thinking they would help me. Instead, I believe this clever plot was probably devised to prdvent me from exposing the corruption in the lottery system. I have proof that can prove that the officianls at both NJ and NY lotteries are corrupt. But they'll do anything to prdvent that, I think including eliminating me. Who do you think they'll protect, Me, who they perceive as just a person or the integrity of their system? The answer is... [ More ]

Comment #17

Jorli D — Thu, 25 Dec 2003 01:01:57 GMT

Good Luck jacaesar.

Comment #16

weshar75 — Wed, 24 Dec 2003 20:40:50 GMT

In the Rules and Regulations section of the Powerball slip play sheet it says, The ticket, not the game slip, shall be the only valid proof of the selections made and the only valid receipt for claiming a prize. Your state laws which govern lottery prize collections would talk about how the ticket is your only proof that you indeed won. I feel bad for you that you were robbed. The unclaimed prize is going to go to the state unless you proceed with legal action. I hope you win your winnin... [ More ]

Comment #15

Todd — Wed, 24 Dec 2003 19:17:41 GMT

Have you contacted an attorney yet? I hope you haven't shot yourself in the foot by waiting until after the ticket expires to file your suit.

Comment #14

jacaesar — Wed, 24 Dec 2003 18:49:14 GMT

Thank you Todd: I believe this is a clever way for the lottery officials in conspiracy with politicians to try and discredit me. However, if the purchase data is protected from being modified they can match it with the information which I supplied to them months ago and prove something very wrong is going on. Note: The winning information was never posted on the mega million website when the ticket came out. Moreover it was pulled from the NY website and subsequently put back on after I no... [ More ]

Comment #13

Todd — Wed, 24 Dec 2003 17:57:57 GMT

jacaesar,Good luck in your suit, I hope you're successful. If you do indeed file a lawsuit, be sure to send me updates so I can post the news stories about it here.

Comment #12

jacaesar — Wed, 24 Dec 2003 17:54:34 GMT

THis guy is lying. I purchased that ticket and I notified the NY Lottery after it was stolen from my home. I also notified them of the exact date and approximate time the ticket was purchased and it was not on December 24, 2002 as stated by the NY Lottery Director on August 19, 2003. He must be a part of the scheme.

Comment #11

jacaesar — Wed, 24 Dec 2003 17:48:19 GMT

This guy is lying. I wonder who's paying him. The reason why the ticket hasn't been claimed is because it was stolen from my home in New Jersey and I believe whomever stole it has been in contact with the NY Lottery and that there is a conspiracy going on. I will immediately seek a lawyer. I have notified the lottery of the exact date and approximate time the ticket was purchased and it was not purchased on December 24, 2002 as reported by the Lottery Director. I think this is part of the... [ More ]

Comment #10

visiondude — Wed, 24 Dec 2003 09:16:45 GMT

sorry jorli. i was referring to the johnny cochranes of life and those lawyers on the back of phone books. if at first it doesn't fit, you must admit iamgoingtoneedagoodlawyerpostvision

Comment #9

DoubleDown — Wed, 24 Dec 2003 00:40:31 GMT

Hey--What's brown and black and looks good on a lawyer ?a doberman.....just kidding <:Merry Christmas to all and to all a good night

Comment #8

Jorli D — Tue, 23 Dec 2003 23:29:59 GMT

Go easy on lawyers....we're not all bad! LOL

Comment #7

weshar75 — Tue, 23 Dec 2003 22:29:15 GMT

What kind of lottery winner, if the doctor is even the winner,asks for less than the ticket is worth. Besides the fact that he left his ticket in a mysteriously convinent non-retrievable situation. Sounds like the doctor is a conman looking for a get rich scheme.

Comment #6

kbcherokee — Tue, 23 Dec 2003 22:09:34 GMT

V:My thoughts exactly...Chief

Comment #5

visiondude — Tue, 23 Dec 2003 21:51:31 GMT

looks like dr. bechet

Comment #4

Bug — Tue, 23 Dec 2003 17:42:38 GMT

Compelling evidence? The right lawyer and meaningless evidence might work

Comment #3

fja — Tue, 23 Dec 2003 17:30:49 GMT

Thats going to have to be some pretty compelling evidence for that to be awarded....even settled as a nuisance suit

Comment #2

winsumloosesum — Tue, 23 Dec 2003 13:24:15 GMT

I have that ticket too!!I settle for $30 million and half to my lawyer.

Comment #1

CASH Only — Tue, 23 Dec 2003 13:14:33 GMT

I had been wondering what happened with that ticket.As for suing for less than the jackpot value, obviously the ticket was not worth $68 million because of the annuity interest.

Lottery 'winner' sues for $63M

Lottery Post — Tue, 23 Dec 2003 10:37:42 GMT

All he wants for Christmas is $63 million - plus interest.A Brooklyn man has filed suit against New York Lottery, claiming he won last year's Mega Millions drawing on Christmas Eve.Dr. Fritzner Bechette claims he lost the ticket in a non-retrievable situation and has tried to claim the prize since last Dec. 25.Lottery officials say the ticket is worth $68 million. It wasn't immediately clear why Bechette is suing for $5 million less. The suit was filed in Queens Supreme Court last week.The dea... [ More ]