Inspector 3 Results Using Random #

Reply #3

LANTERN — Mon, 29 Nov 2004 17:09:16 GMT

This is very good and interesting, but I think that also one should run state's past winning numbers thru your Inspector 3 to check for possible both short term and long term biases, that might just give you a winning edge on your particular state's game and or all the states that you play.And yes, running 2 to 3 thousand numbers might just give you an indication as to the randomness of your states pick 3 numbers and or digits.But as I said, perhaps the software is best for checking states numbe... [ More ]

Reply #2

Todd — Mon, 29 Nov 2004 16:00:51 GMT

Maybe a bigger sample would be useful to check for biases. I don't think 100 is enough. Maybe 2000-3000. Then we could produce the same amount of picks from the Lottery Post QP generator to see how they compare.

Reply #1

CalifDude — Mon, 29 Nov 2004 12:04:44 GMT

I notice that I didn't say that the 100 numbers I used were from the source of random digits using a radioactive isotope. They are

Inspector 3 Results Using Random #

CalifDude — Mon, 29 Nov 2004 11:53:21 GMT

I have already posted some results using Inspector 3. The following is for comparison to those results. The results shown below were done by using 100 random numbers from a true random number generator. I don't want to get into the very very long discussion about what is truly random and what is not but virtually all experts in the fields of mathematics and cryptography agree that numbers generated from the decay of a radioactive isotope is random, or at least as random as you can possibly ge... [ More ]