<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
	<channel>
		<title>Schneider randomness testing</title>
		<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/101710</link>
		<atom:link href="https://www.lotterypost.com/rss/topic/101710" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<description>Lottery Post Forum Topic: Schneider randomness testing</description>
		<dc:language>en-us</dc:language>
		<generator>Lottery Post RSS Generator</generator>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #9</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/101710/304009</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/101710/304009</guid>
			<pubDate>Tue, 21 Dec 2004 22:15:20 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>cd_shopper</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Hi,Im working on many filters and i use relations like &#x3c; &#x3e; = &#x3e;= &#x3c;= + * - mod but there are two thinks i dont think im gonna use:Fibbonacci Series: Computers have resource problems working with Fibbonacci numbers, specially mine. They eat up too many resurces. And cant calculate big numbers.Divisibility: Computers have problems dividing by zero, which happens to be one of the pick-3 possible digits....I dont know about the Lucas theory, so no opinion on that.In short... i wont try it in my system... &#x5b;&#xa0;<a href="https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/101710/304009">More</a>&#xa0;&#x5d;</p>]]></description>
			<category>cd_shopper</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #8</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/101710/302508</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/101710/302508</guid>
			<pubDate>Sat, 18 Dec 2004 23:23:42 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Bertil</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Quote: Originally posted by JAG331 on December 18, 2004A complete waste of money.  My opinion.  He treats the reader like a child, repeating the same thing learned on page 3 on pages 5,7,13,20,25, etc.It&#x27;s simple statistics using the UK Lottery and Florida Lotto 6/49.  For example, he spends half the book dealing with multiples...of 2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9, etc.  Ok, so you&#x27;re saying that 1 out of every 7 numbers drawn should be evenly divisible by 7...fascinating!On a positive note I did learn about th... &#x5b;&#xa0;<a href="https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/101710/302508">More</a>&#xa0;&#x5d;</p>]]></description>
			<category>Bertil</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #7</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/101710/302402</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/101710/302402</guid>
			<pubDate>Sat, 18 Dec 2004 19:19:08 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Todd</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the review.</p>]]></description>
			<category>Todd</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #6</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/101710/302395</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/101710/302395</guid>
			<pubDate>Sat, 18 Dec 2004 19:05:57 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>JAG331</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>A complete waste of money.  My opinion.  He treats the reader like a child, repeating the same thing learned on page 3 on pages 5,7,13,20,25, etc.It&#x27;s simple statistics using the UK Lottery and Florida Lotto 6/49.  For example, he spends half the book dealing with multiples...of 2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9, etc.  Ok, so you&#x27;re saying that 1 out of every 7 numbers drawn should be evenly divisible by 7...fascinating!On a positive note I did learn about the Lucas number sequence.  Maybe these analyses would be... &#x5b;&#xa0;<a href="https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/101710/302395">More</a>&#xa0;&#x5d;</p>]]></description>
			<category>JAG331</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #5</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/101710/300020</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/101710/300020</guid>
			<pubDate>Mon, 13 Dec 2004 15:27:37 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>JAG331</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>The Schneider book just arrived at work today.  Let me read it and I will get back.</p>]]></description>
			<category>JAG331</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #4</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/101710/294277</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/101710/294277</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 02 Dec 2004 23:36:33 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Todd</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>I&#x27;ve also found this one to be very good</p>]]></description>
			<category>Todd</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #3</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/101710/294274</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/101710/294274</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 02 Dec 2004 23:25:16 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>johnph77</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>From Amazon:http://www.amazon.ca/exec/obidos/ASIN/1588518809/ref%3Dbr%5Flf%5Fb%5F3/701-8892945-4646754gljohn</p>]]></description>
			<category>johnph77</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #2</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/101710/294078</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/101710/294078</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 02 Dec 2004 16:12:38 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>JAG331</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>I&#x27;m picking up a copy too.  The more filters the better, then it&#x27;s just a matter of knowing when to use certain filters.</p>]]></description>
			<category>JAG331</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #1</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/101710/293921</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/101710/293921</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 02 Dec 2004 09:50:32 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>ayenowitall</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Bertil,I&#x27;ve not read this book, but I&#x27;m definitely intrigued by the concept of randomness as it pertains to lotteries. I&#x27;m going to try to get hold of the book and take a look at his methods. I&#x27;ll post something as soon as I&#x27;ve read the book and had time to consider what he offers.Good luck,aye</p>]]></description>
			<category>ayenowitall</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Schneider randomness testing</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/101710</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/101710</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 01 Dec 2004 01:38:51 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Bertil</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>H. Schneider has published an interestng book about randomness testng of    lottery numbers. He tests for divisibility, prime, Fibonacci and Lucas numbers.    Has anybody used his method and if so, what did you discover? His analysis is based    52 draws of old 6/49 games and thus a very limited statistic, but lots of filters.    His book is :  Lottery numbers past, present   future  published in 2001.    I could find no reference here at LP using the search function.      Bertil</p>]]></description>
			<category>Bertil</category>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

