Connecticut Classic Lotto

Reply #20

CASH Only — Tue, 12 Apr 2005 18:48:56 GMT

Would Connecticut give up Classic Lotto if MUSL replaced Hot Lotto with another jackpot game

Reply #19

CASH Only — Wed, 30 Mar 2005 17:38:55 GMT

I don't know one draw machine from another.

Reply #18

JimmySand9 — Thu, 10 Mar 2005 00:52:45 GMT

Quote: Originally posted by NearNewBrit on March 9, 2005 If you want an answer like The Drawmaster 2000, then I don't know that answer.44 balls drop into the 'mixing chamber' (cube) via several (4-5?) tubes. The numbers are now drawn when the M.C. pulls open the latch on each of the six escape tubes and the balls are held at the top though the M.C. twists the ball into a prime viewing angle for the forward cameras. One has a close-up on the escape tubes and the other begins with a view of the M.... [ More ]

Reply #17

NearNewBrit — Wed, 09 Mar 2005 20:44:25 GMT

If you want an answer like The Drawmaster 2000, then I don't know that answer.44 balls drop into the 'mixing chamber' (cube) via several (4-5?) tubes. The numbers are now drawn when the M.C. pulls open the latch on each of the six escape tubes and the balls are held at the top though the M.C. twists the ball into a prime viewing angle for the forward cameras. One has a close-up on the escape tubes and the other begins with a view of the M.C. and the machine, which then closes to closer shot of t... [ More ]

Reply #16

NearNewBrit — Wed, 09 Mar 2005 20:35:58 GMT

Quote: Originally posted by JimmySand9 on February 25, 2005 And does anyone know what kind of machine they use for Classic Lotto

Reply #15

CASH Only — Wed, 09 Mar 2005 20:33:02 GMT

Now even the annuity value of CT Classic Lotto is higher.

Reply #14

JimmySand9 — Fri, 25 Feb 2005 22:29:54 GMT

And does anyone know what kind of machine they use for Classic Lotto

Reply #13

JimmySand9 — Fri, 25 Feb 2005 22:23:15 GMT

And cash-option wise, CT Classic Lotto is worth more than Powerball. Not much more, but still more.

Reply #12

CASH Only — Fri, 25 Feb 2005 21:39:13 GMT

Pretty good jackpot roll.

Reply #11

CASH Only — Fri, 28 Jan 2005 18:48:30 GMT

Change in matrix includes the possibility of a price increase.

Reply #10

CASH Only — Mon, 24 Jan 2005 22:28:44 GMT

$7.2 million for Tuesday, Jan 25.

Reply #9

CASH Only — Wed, 19 Jan 2005 14:59:00 GMT

First $7 million jackpot since 2003.

Reply #8

CASH Only — Mon, 10 Jan 2005 22:24:41 GMT

Jackpot getting up there.

Reply #7

CASH Only — Sun, 19 Dec 2004 18:37:45 GMT

Jimmy:Then why does Maryland also have a Classic Lotto

Reply #6

JimmySand9 — Sat, 18 Dec 2004 23:10:01 GMT

You forgot never , and that's my guess. That's why they call it Classic Lotto.

Reply #5

CASH Only — Sat, 18 Dec 2004 19:27:00 GMT

Finally back over $5 million.

Reply #4

CASH Only — Sat, 11 Dec 2004 19:12:37 GMT

I've said before Connecticut should try Hot Lotto.

Reply #3

JAG331 — Sat, 11 Dec 2004 02:37:04 GMT

I know it's a slow 100k crawl on the first 25 rollovers....now it's at about 200k. But what could be done to change that? I thought the population of CT relegates it to a smaller jackpot win

Reply #2

CASH Only — Wed, 08 Dec 2004 21:07:55 GMT

A lot has changed lottery-wise since 1989. Connecticut didn't join MUSL until 1995. Jackpots increase by only 100k-200k at lower levels.

Reply #1

JAG331 — Wed, 08 Dec 2004 20:19:43 GMT

If they haven't changed it in 15 years, why would they change it now

Connecticut Classic Lotto

CASH Only — Tue, 07 Dec 2004 21:19:21 GMT

Connecticut Lotto, in several forms, has been a 6/44 game since 1989.