Hi GURU, what's the 1.8 lottosynch Status

Reply #39

paul762 — Tue, 25 Jan 2005 20:56:40 GMT

Reply #38

vick — Tue, 25 Jan 2005 20:26:44 GMT

Quote: Originally posted by Guru on January 25, 2005Indeed Reddog, you are right. By this:The information that Paul gave you is correct. I'll be too busy in february to continue development of ls 1.8The good news is: March still looks relatively calm. (fingers crossed)Thanks for getting back to us Guru, it's good to know that your business is doing so well and hopefully you had some good holidays.So basically what are we looking at for a possible 1.8 release? early or mid or late March? because... [ More ]

Reply #37

Guru — Tue, 25 Jan 2005 17:59:21 GMT

Indeed Reddog, you are right. By this:The information that Paul gave you is correct. I'll be too busy in february to continue development of ls 1.8The good news is: March still looks relatively calm. (fingers crossed

Reply #36

reddog — Tue, 25 Jan 2005 11:39:12 GMT

The right thing to do is take 2 minutes out of his busy schedule and post what Paul just informed us.

Reply #35

paul762 — Tue, 25 Jan 2005 11:22:33 GMT

I sent guru an email asking what was happening, he still plans to finish 1.8 but he said he cant now put a date on it, as february is full also. It looks like were in for a long wait.

Reply #34

reddog — Mon, 24 Jan 2005 22:11:25 GMT

Quote: Originally posted by paul762 on January 24, 2005if I were you I would forget about 1.8 this year, as february is already fully booked for guru also.Paul, where did you hear that from

Reply #33

MillionsWanted — Mon, 24 Jan 2005 18:46:19 GMT

Quote: Originally posted by lottoshlep on January 24, 2005 Hey MW,are you referring to the Challenge Test? Is it on now? Last I read it was abandoned due to the poor/insufficient response from invited lotto software suppliers?No. It's just a very unofficial test I have been running in my blog.

Reply #32

lottoshlep — Mon, 24 Jan 2005 18:36:52 GMT

Hey MW,are you referring to the Challenge Test? Is it on now? Last I read it was abandoned due to the poor/insufficient response from invited lotto software suppliers

Reply #31

MillionsWanted — Mon, 24 Jan 2005 17:34:02 GMT

Another one and a half month and you have been waiting a year for version 1.8.I can see why (especially those who got version 1.7) you are and are ing over waiting and waiting and waiting...Meanwhile, I recommend you to follow my tests on Lotto Sorcerer.

Reply #30

LANTERN — Mon, 24 Jan 2005 17:00:53 GMT

It sure does look like you are right.

Reply #29

paul762 — Mon, 24 Jan 2005 16:21:32 GMT

if I were you I would forget about 1.8 this year, as february is already fully booked for guru also.

Reply #28

LANTERN — Mon, 24 Jan 2005 02:20:15 GMT

I sure wish that I had the new LottoSync 1.8 already, that would start the new year much better now that I am getting into the jackpot games and a little bit away from the pick 3.I guess that I will have to develop my own jackpot game techniques and I am finally begining to do so after thinking about doing so for a while, I am developing some very unique filters, I don't know if anybody has ever thought or used them before, first I am developing my own stuff and then I will look around to see wh... [ More ]

Reply #27

reddog — Wed, 19 Jan 2005 22:47:53 GMT

Guru, you can jump in any time and concur with what I said. Hello

Reply #26

reddog — Mon, 17 Jan 2005 23:33:32 GMT

Quote: Originally posted by Hyperdimension on January 17, 2005For Lottosync users,The previous version of Lottosync has a good number prediction? Is it good with pick 5, 6, 7? or only with pick 3, 4?they were not designed for anything but a 6 number lotto. It was able to be used with the 5 plus 1 Mega Ball game also. I did not have any luck with the previous versions. BUT 1.8 WAS suppose to solve all the problems were having. 1.8 is suppose to be able to handle pick 3 all the way to Keno.

Reply #25

Hyperdimension — Mon, 17 Jan 2005 19:16:57 GMT

For Lottosync users,The previous version of Lottosync has a good number prediction? Is it good with pick 5, 6, 7? or only with pick 3, 4

Reply #24

vick — Mon, 17 Jan 2005 18:46:26 GMT

Quote: Originally posted by paul762 on January 17, 2005I have to disagree with you lantern, filtered wheels are no use without the winning numbers to put in them, I still think the prediction engine should be no.1 priority. the prediction engine should be no.1 priority

Reply #23

paul762 — Mon, 17 Jan 2005 13:47:23 GMT

I have to disagree with you lantern, filtered wheels are no use without the winning numbers to put in them, I still think the prediction engine should be no.1 priority.

Reply #22

LANTERN — Mon, 17 Jan 2005 01:14:54 GMT

BobP is right. All that we can do is wait or get nothing for sure, if we wait at least there is some chance that we might get something, what? I don't know.But even if the program does not work yet, I think that some how in some way in the future it can be made to work better, I don't say that it can be made to be the golden goose, but that it can be made to be better than versions 1.5 to 1.7, specially with the proper filtered wheels.The main thing is to soon get a program that can work with... [ More ]

Reply #21

reddog — Sun, 16 Jan 2005 17:11:56 GMT

Paul, to put it bluntly, he has us by the bs !! OUCH

Reply #20

paul762 — Sun, 16 Jan 2005 11:53:13 GMT

now you put it like that bob, it makes perfect sense, all this waiting and anticipation must be blinding my judgement somewhat, looking back now though guru was here on 26th dec. saying he was busy all jan. so lets all hope for a feb. release, and a useful version update.

Reply #19

BobP — Sun, 16 Jan 2005 07:01:30 GMT

Quote: Originally posted by paul762 on January 15, 2005Quote: Originally posted by BobP on January 14, 2005Friend of the family came back and announced she's bought a house. Thing is, there is no house. There's land and a model and you save money by every month you get in early, but you have to gamble someday there will be a house you can move into.When a guy appears here saying he's got exactly what we want, but it isn't quite ready yet, would you like to take a chance and buy in? What's a l... [ More ]

Reply #18

MillionsWanted — Sat, 15 Jan 2005 12:26:05 GMT

I don't think he dare to post on this forum again until version 1.8 of his program really is finished.

Reply #17

paul762 — Sat, 15 Jan 2005 11:21:20 GMT

Quote: Originally posted by BobP on January 14, 2005Friend of the family came back and announced she's bought a house. Thing is, there is no house. There's land and a model and you save money by every month you get in early, but you have to gamble someday there will be a house you can move into.When a guy appears here saying he's got exactly what we want, but it isn't quite ready yet, would you like to take a chance and buy in? What's a lottery player to do? If you need to hear from Guru you... [ More ]

Reply #16

emilyg — Sat, 15 Jan 2005 02:44:10 GMT

Reply #15

BobP — Sat, 15 Jan 2005 02:39:56 GMT

Friend of the family came back and announced she's bought a house. Thing is, there is no house. There's land and a model and you save money by every month you get in early, but you have to gamble someday there will be a house you can move into.When a guy appears here saying he's got exactly what we want, but it isn't quite ready yet, would you like to take a chance and buy in? What's a lottery player to do? If you need to hear from Guru you can try sending him an email too. In the mean time l... [ More ]

Reply #14

paul762 — Fri, 14 Jan 2005 16:29:36 GMT

some sort of reply or progress report from guru would be helpful right now I feel, this has been part of the problem all along, it takes just two minutes to leave a message here, theres no excuse

Reply #13

BobP — Fri, 14 Jan 2005 06:41:56 GMT

I'm not ready to say for certain there isn't some brilliant elegantsolution for shaking a can of numbers and having the winners fallout among a larger group often enough to be useful. I hope Guruhas found a way to code it. BobP

Reply #12

reddog — Thu, 13 Jan 2005 23:08:48 GMT

Roses are redThe violets have blued.Spent $114 US dollarsAnd now feel s*****d

Reply #11

Raziel — Thu, 13 Jan 2005 20:45:47 GMT

I'm with ya Lantern!Raziel

Reply #10

LANTERN — Thu, 13 Jan 2005 18:14:58 GMT

Mirror, mirror in the wall;Which and where is the best lottery program of all ? LottoSync, Where are you ? We miss you

Reply #9

paul762 — Thu, 13 Jan 2005 15:08:27 GMT

hey red. I doubt 1.8 will amount to much anyway, look at all the hype with the first version, and how that turned out. I placed my order for it in feb 04, so I have been waiting nearly a year for the system to beat all systems, but there are probably people who have been waiting longer than me, and I say beat all system because thats how it was portrayed on here and on other forums when it was first released. I must admit, the printed ticket was good, but come on, he does run a graphics company,... [ More ]

Reply #8

reddog — Thu, 13 Jan 2005 11:04:28 GMT

Quote: Originally posted by Raziel on January 12, 2005 Looking forward to LS 1.8......just because GURU is taking his time and has put it off on the release till this month does not mean it's going to be a bust or in fact a big winner.....but as long as it is an improvement over 1.7 that's good enough for me even a slight improvement will increase my winning percentage. Plus being able to play KENO that for me IS A big improvement.Razielyou aren't going to see it this month. He already said the... [ More ]

Reply #7

Raziel — Thu, 13 Jan 2005 00:18:51 GMT

Looking forward to LS 1.8......just because GURU is taking his time and has put it off on the release till this month does not mean it's going to be a bust or in fact a big winner.....but as long as it is an improvement over 1.7 that's good enough for me even a slight improvement will increase my winning percentage. Plus being able to play KENO that for me IS A big improvement.Raziel

Reply #6

lottoshlep — Wed, 12 Jan 2005 19:30:54 GMT

Quote: Originally posted by vick on January 12, 2005well, if and when 1.8 is released i think it WILL be an improvement over 1.7Now let's get 1.8 into out grubby lotto hands so we can put it through it's paces and win some $BIG$ money... yaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaI like that optimistic attitude of yours Vic, ... now all we need is a rolling-in-the-dough smilie to go along with your sunny disposition ... must be some powerful perk you have there

Reply #5

LANTERN — Wed, 12 Jan 2005 19:25:45 GMT

Quote: Originally posted by vick on January 12, 2005well, if? and when? 1.8 is released i think it WILL be an improvement over 1.7Now let's get 1.8 into out grubby lotto hands so we can put it through it's paces and win some $BIG$ money... yaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa

Reply #4

vick — Wed, 12 Jan 2005 18:41:29 GMT

well, if and when 1.8 is released i think it WILL be an improvement over 1.7Now let's get 1.8 into out grubby lotto hands so we can put it through it's paces and win some $BIG$ money... yaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa

Reply #3

MillionsWanted — Wed, 12 Jan 2005 11:02:41 GMT

It seems that he has been hyping his software way too much and created too much expectations.

Reply #2

paul762 — Wed, 12 Jan 2005 10:18:48 GMT

somethings not right with this anymore, perhaps we should have realised when 1.6 was hyped up and left everyone out of pocket.

Reply #1

reddog — Tue, 11 Jan 2005 22:15:35 GMT

I seriously doubt we will see any improvement in anything anytime soon. That is my gut feeling.

Hi GURU, what's the 1.8 lottosynch Status

vick — Mon, 10 Jan 2005 20:12:54 GMT

Hi GURU, what's the 1.8 lottosynch Status ?Thanks