<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
	<channel>
		<title>an idea for todd</title>
		<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/105940</link>
		<atom:link href="https://www.lotterypost.com/rss/topic/105940" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<description>Lottery Post Forum Topic: an idea for todd</description>
		<dc:language>en-us</dc:language>
		<generator>Lottery Post RSS Generator</generator>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #2</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/105940/321494</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/105940/321494</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jan 2005 22:31:29 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>MADDOG10</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>it would be interesting if some lottery officials would get involved in some of the forums here at lp. i believe that most of the lottery officials really don&#x27;t have the intestinal fortitude to look any further than their nose, for fear of ruffling some feathers, so to speak. i&#x27;m not saying their aren&#x27;t some who do get involved with the public on issues about their own lottery, and rightfully so they should. most do not get involved though because i guess they&#x27;re not in tune with the betting pub... &#x5b;&#xa0;<a href="https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/105940/321494">More</a>&#xa0;&#x5d;</p>]]></description>
			<category>MADDOG10</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #1</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/105940/321489</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/105940/321489</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jan 2005 22:09:41 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Todd</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Yes, I agree.  There are actually several industry folks that browse the forums here, but for the most part they seem reluctant to join the discussions.  Too bad.  I&#x27;ll bet the players would think very highly of those who participate.One notable exception was Chuck Strutt (Executive Director of MUSL), who engaged in an interesting discussion about random numbers.(Chuck is one of my favorite industry people, because he not not  above  speaking with regular players, and is in fact very thoughtful.... &#x5b;&#xa0;<a href="https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/105940/321489">More</a>&#xa0;&#x5d;</p>]]></description>
			<category>Todd</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>an idea for todd</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/105940</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/105940</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jan 2005 21:02:05 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>dvdiva</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>I was wondering if you could get representatives from different state lotteries here from time to time. This site is getting to be important and it would be nice to get some feedback to the different lotteries.</p>]]></description>
			<category>dvdiva</category>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

