The Pigskin Challenge for Saturday 01-22-

Reply #32

ayenowitall — Thu, 27 Jan 2005 00:26:39 GMT

Todd,Thanks for pointing out a good little way to prdvent a big ole loss. After all these years and lost words on the 'net, I should have better saving habits. I'll keep your suggestion in mind.aye

Reply #31

RJOh — Tue, 25 Jan 2005 15:51:02 GMT

Quote: Originally posted by kbcherokee on January 24, 2005Quote: Originally posted by Litebets27 on January 23, 2005Thanks for the welcome Jag331.Aye, I'm trying to perfect a system based on eliminating pass picks. But as you can see from the results, I haven't perfected it as of yet. But i'll keep trying. This idea of a challange was a good idea to compare my results with others. Thank you also.Just curious, but how can you have a system to choose number's without having the history of past d... [ More ]

Reply #30

Todd — Tue, 25 Jan 2005 13:57:40 GMT

Quote: Originally posted by ayenowitall on January 23, 2005Actually, I wrote quite a long post about this. Unfortunately, it was eaten alive. I'm not even going to try to recapture it. I'm sure you've all heard it before.Good luck'aye'A tip for those who write long messages:Before you click the button to post your message, always copy the message to the clipboard. Then, if the web server has a hiccup and your message is eaten, you have a copy of the message ready to paste into a new message.It... [ More ]

Reply #29

ayenowitall — Tue, 25 Jan 2005 08:27:03 GMT

Quote: Originally posted by hypersoniq on January 23, 2005If you're after improving prediction skills... we need to discuss the methods rather than look at just results. Whether it be an open discussion on methods, tools, formulas, or whatever... accuracy can come a bit later...but good luck getting people to open up about the systems in use for a jackpot game... for the obvious reasons...but for the heck of it (and one more attempt to get some open PB discussion going) here's my current system.... [ More ]

Reply #28

kbcherokee — Mon, 24 Jan 2005 13:24:44 GMT

Quote: Originally posted by Litebets27 on January 23, 2005Thanks for the welcome Jag331.Aye, I'm trying to perfect a system based on eliminating pass picks. But as you can see from the results, I haven't perfected it as of yet. But i'll keep trying. This idea of a challange was a good idea to compare my results with others. Thank you also.Just curious, but how can you have a system to choose number's without having the history of past draws/picks?Chief

Reply #27

plnwebguy — Mon, 24 Jan 2005 04:44:20 GMT

My system is a combination of my drop ball theory and draw history. This last drawing I decided to do something new to tweak the system a bit and that was to leave out the 5 balls from the previous drawing to narrow things down a bit. I ended up leaving out 32 and 33 and going with 30 and 31 instead - so much for the tweak.

Reply #26

MADDOG10 — Sun, 23 Jan 2005 21:07:03 GMT

total agreement chief

Reply #25

Litebets27 — Sun, 23 Jan 2005 21:06:35 GMT

litebets27

Reply #24

kbcherokee — Sun, 23 Jan 2005 21:03:18 GMT

Tso-gali-IOne other thing that was unusual with this draw is that two of the number's that hit this time,(#32 #33) hit last draw also. You very, very seldom ever see that happen. So, naturally when your choosing the number's your going to play, you wouldn't be looking for three number's to hit in a row again. The odds are just not there. It's just like a Horse Race, you wouldn't bet on a Horse that hasen't won a Race in 100-Starts... right?Let's face it, the PB and the MM games have don... [ More ]

Reply #23

MADDOG10 — Sun, 23 Jan 2005 20:58:57 GMT

Quote: Originally posted by ayenowitall on January 22, 2005I started this challenge for the purpose of promoting improvement of prediction skills. I really don't see that happening. There's been nothing here in terms of accuracy and consistency to indicate that anyone is making any progress. It seems to me that we're getting worse instead of better. Is anybody really working at this? Are we just going through the same old tired motions for each draw? We seem to be drifting aimlessly.aye' if ever... [ More ]

Reply #22

Litebets27 — Sun, 23 Jan 2005 20:39:00 GMT

Thanks for the welcome Jag331.Aye, I'm trying to perfect a system based on eliminating pass picks. But as you can see from the results, I haven't perfected it as of yet. But i'll keep trying. This idea of a challange was a good idea to compare my results with others. Thank you also.

Reply #21

kbcherokee — Sun, 23 Jan 2005 20:33:13 GMT

Tso-gali-IMy 2-cents is that I have given some of my information several times in here. i just don't know if anyone has used any of it. I didn't get any feedback if they did or not. I just know what I use and it gets me very close at times, more often than not. So, to me; it's working. It's not where I want it be naturally, but it's getting closer all the time.I would encourage all concerned, to not give up on their system and dreams. That's not what all of this about by no means. keep doing... [ More ]

Reply #20

RJOh — Sun, 23 Jan 2005 20:07:21 GMT

People do share their systems and there are some success stories as I recalled when checking one of my old posts. https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/99730 Success doesn't happen as often as failure, so it's forgotten and some players expectations are not realistic considering the odds of winning in most lotteries.RJOh

Reply #19

JAG331 — Sun, 23 Jan 2005 19:59:19 GMT

Powerball Drawing 1/22/05: 11-23-32-33-34 / 38kbcherokee: 6-11-16-22-28-29-30-44-45-50maddog10: 3-20-22-29-38-39-40-44-45-48plnwebguy: 1-2-6-11-26-30-31-45-48-50ayenowitall: 14-20-27-36-45getpaid: 1-3-5-12-13-14-25-39-48-50fja: 3-5-7-12-22-25-32-37-41-47pigskin: 4-8-9-14-23-24-39-40-41-46litebets27: 17-19-21-28-34-36-37-38-42-43jag331: 4-6-8-9-10-16-31-40-51-53 Keep your chin up, Aye, we'll get 'em next time

Reply #18

JAG331 — Sun, 23 Jan 2005 19:41:03 GMT

Hypersoniq,Thanks for sharing your method. You're a lot more open with methods than most of us, myself included.Since I'm still developing my system, I'm holding onto the hope that I've stumbled upon a great idea...lol. I think I would feel comfortable sharing my method under two circumstances. One, I determine it doesn't work, haha....or Two, I meet in person with two to three other dedicated LP'ers. We would sign all the contractual agreements...confidentiality, share of winnings, etc. And... [ More ]

Reply #17

pigskin — Sun, 23 Jan 2005 18:42:55 GMT

Aye...there were only a couple of #s hit this week. But you certainly can't get discouraged. At least we have more challengers each week. So in that sense you definitely succeeded because you have spearheaded this effort. If we do see some improvement it probably will be later than sooner. I feel it will definitely take time, involving trial and error, rather than a quick breakthrough. So the game plan has to be to just keep hitting between guard and tackle-a dedicated, relentless effort t... [ More ]

Reply #16

hypersoniq — Sun, 23 Jan 2005 18:32:34 GMT

AyeIf you're after improving prediction skills... we need to discuss the methods rather than look at just results. Whether it be an open discussion on methods, tools, formulas, or whatever... accuracy can come a bit later...but good luck getting people to open up about the systems in use for a jackpot game... for the obvious reasons...but for the heck of it (and one more attempt to get some open PB discussion going) here's my current system....1 excel workbook with 4 sheets...Sheet 1 is a Long T... [ More ]

Reply #15

ayenowitall — Sun, 23 Jan 2005 18:18:45 GMT

Actually, I wrote quite a long post about this. Unfortunately, it was eaten alive. I'm not even going to try to recapture it. I'm sure you've all heard it before.Good luck'aye

Reply #14

RJOh — Sun, 23 Jan 2005 17:14:36 GMT

Quote: Originally posted by ayenowitall on January 22, 2005I started this challenge for the purpose of promoting improvement of prediction skills. I really don't see that happening........................ Is anybody really working at this?...........aye'What happened to the fun part? Predicting numbers and sharing ideas shouldn't be like work. That what Gail Howard and Steve Player do, but they do it for a living.RJOh

Reply #13

JAG331 — Sun, 23 Jan 2005 04:55:02 GMT

Aye, I know you're frustrated, but don't get all upset.We are all working very hard on our numbers. Some days the numbers fool everyone. Who could've predicted that PB would copycat MM's 39-40-41 with a 32-33-34? I am still in the middle of creating a working system, one where I feel confident about the numbers I play.Progress...didn't Maddog just hit 4 numbers recently?In the end we all have to make a choice. Some people conclude that numbers cannot be predicted. Others keep on keeping on.... [ More ]

Reply #12

ayenowitall — Sun, 23 Jan 2005 04:43:59 GMT

I started this challenge for the purpose of promoting improvement of prediction skills. I really don't see that happening. There's been nothing here in terms of accuracy and consistency to indicate that anyone is making any progress. It seems to me that we're getting worse instead of better. Is anybody really working at this? Are we just going through the same old tired motions for each draw? We seem to be drifting aimlessly.aye

Reply #11

JAG331 — Sun, 23 Jan 2005 01:23:01 GMT

Litebets,I didn't even see you for the 1/19 challenge. Welcome to the Pigskin Challenge.

Reply #10

Litebets27 — Sat, 22 Jan 2005 20:53:05 GMT

17 19 21 28 34 36 37 38 42 43 PBs 15 or 33snowed in LOL

Reply #9

kbcherokee — Sat, 22 Jan 2005 20:04:07 GMT

Quote: Originally posted by JAG331 on January 22, 20054-6-8-9-10-16-31-40-51-53PB: 35, 40Ran across the street to get my two tix. Snow started a half hour ago, roads already treacherous. 1-2 feet, bring it on!JAG331:Glad you were able to get your tickets before it got to the 2-foot stage... Good luck.We were supposed to get between 6 to 9-inches and ended up gettin only 2-inches here where we are. I'll take that...Good luck with your picks. Chief

Reply #8

JAG331 — Sat, 22 Jan 2005 18:03:00 GMT

4-6-8-9-10-16-31-40-51-53PB: 35, 40Ran across the street to get my two tix. Snow started a half hour ago, roads already treacherous. 1-2 feet, bring it on

Reply #7

ayenowitall — Sat, 22 Jan 2005 08:14:41 GMT

14-20-27-36-45

Reply #6

plnwebguy — Sat, 22 Jan 2005 01:02:26 GMT

wb - 1, 2, 6, 11, 26, 30, 31, 45, 48, 50pb - 4 or 11plnwebguy

Reply #5

MADDOG10 — Fri, 21 Jan 2005 23:54:22 GMT

allright chief here we go 3-20-22-29-38-39-40-44-45-48 pb's 4=31 goodluck to all...

Reply #4

pigskin — Fri, 21 Jan 2005 19:05:18 GMT

Here are my 10 for Sat. 4,8,9,14,,23,24,39,40,41 and 46. PBs...18 and 31.

Reply #3

fja — Fri, 21 Jan 2005 18:51:41 GMT

Power numbers re-worked based on repeat number theory:3,5,7,12,22,25,32,37,41,47PB : 47,49,17

Reply #2

getpaid — Fri, 21 Jan 2005 15:21:34 GMT

1 3 5 12 13 14 25 39 48 50 PB 20I am still going with my failed numbers from previous drawing. So I would extend it a little bit. I got a good feeling with it.

Reply #1

kbcherokee — Fri, 21 Jan 2005 13:22:35 GMT

Tso-gali-IWhere's everyone at? You are never given a wish without also being given the power to make it come true. You may have to work for it, however. Chief

The Pigskin Challenge for Saturday 01-22-

kbcherokee — Thu, 20 Jan 2005 19:53:56 GMT

Tso-gali-I-Here are my number's for Saturday's Challenge. -06, 11, 16, 22, 28, 29, 30, 44, 45 and 50My probable PB number's are = 13, 16 and 17I really thought of playin' #40 and #41, but changed my mind...Chief