Guru, yes or no ?

Reply #17

BobP — Fri, 18 Feb 2005 08:18:23 GMT

Guru:Don't most animation studios ship their work to asia for the grunt work of drawing the cells once the basic art has been established? Admittedly I have no idea what you're actually making, I'm guessing commercials am I close? Some years back I was part of a team making a first person shooter doom style game called High Risk, the art was tough making eight views of walking, running, shooting enemies, barely got a working demo out before our game engine was outdated followed by a buggy 3D en... [ More ]

Reply #16

Guru — Thu, 17 Feb 2005 08:33:56 GMT

reddog:I work together with my business partner.So, at the moment we're doing the sales, administration, ... and all the 3D work ourselves.We're thinking about attracting a full time employee (3D artist) at the moment to work with us, but really good 3D artists are difficult to find in Belgium.Most Belgian talents are working for the big studios in England or America.

Reply #15

reddog — Thu, 17 Feb 2005 00:09:09 GMT

I guess that is a no.I manage over 200 employees, Guru. And I still have plenty of time to do what ever I want when I get home. It's called delegate and time management. Are you the only one working in this 3D business

Reply #14

paul762 — Sat, 12 Feb 2005 13:50:04 GMT

Quote: Originally posted by Guru on February 11, 2005Anyone who runs a business seriously probably knows how it can consume all your free time. I live from my animation business, I need to eat and buy clothes too you know.funny that , I think 3 from 6 40-50% of the time would provide me with ample food and clothing and free time.your figures not mine

Reply #13

reddog — Sat, 12 Feb 2005 10:35:49 GMT

Guru, I am the one who asked the question. Was that a NO

Reply #12

LANTERN — Sat, 12 Feb 2005 02:45:55 GMT

While we wait, it might be a good idea to take a very good look at Lotto Architect, it's already here ready to go, should keep anybody busy enough untill LottoSync 1.8 comes and then you will have 2 good programs to use instead of just one, many serious players use more than one lottery program.

Reply #11

BobP — Sat, 12 Feb 2005 01:08:08 GMT

Quote: Originally posted by Guru on February 11, 2005BobP:Buying 1 or 2 extra computers does not buy me more free time to finish Lottosync.When I say I'm busy, then I mean I'm really really busy!!! I'm not using this as an excuse.I'm the one who's been defending you around here. Worth waiting for, golden goose, etc. expand a tiny bit on busy so we understand why dad can't take us to the circus.Anyone who runs a business seriously probably knows how it can consume all your free time. I live fro... [ More ]

Reply #10

Todd — Fri, 11 Feb 2005 21:52:49 GMT

Quote: Originally posted by Guru on February 11, 2005...Anyone who runs a business seriously probably knows how it can consume all your free time....I hear ya

Reply #9

Guru — Fri, 11 Feb 2005 21:19:44 GMT

BobP:Buying 1 or 2 extra computers does not buy me more free time to finish Lottosync.When I say I'm busy, then I mean I'm really really busy!!! I'm not using this as an excuse.Anyone who runs a business seriously probably knows how it can consume all your free time. I live from my animation business, I need to eat and buy clothes too you know.+ When is a lottery software finished ???? When it gives perfect results every draw ? Then it'll probably never be finished !! Be reasonable mr. Perkis.... [ More ]

Reply #8

paul762 — Fri, 11 Feb 2005 11:10:11 GMT

Quote: Originally posted by psykomo on February 10, 2005LEAVE GURU:Alone.....develop, produce your own?????????????????????????????/programs.....software.......systems......etc....GO>>>>> to SUCCESS WITH LOTTERY SYSTEMS .......READ and get BUSY, ..................................................................................................................????develop your own...........buy ......others......don't complain............the software producer who meets the need..........the market... [ More ]

Reply #7

Slok88 — Fri, 11 Feb 2005 10:31:09 GMT

Hi, I'm to waiting for LS1.8, I have to agree with BobP, I've only been waiting since November.LS1.7 hit 3 numbers twice for me, I only play the numbers if the prediction looks decent, last set I didn't bother to play cause it gave me 1,2,3,4,5,8,11,15,22,32 after 30,000 samples, 2 hit from that set, 2 and 8, last 2 from the prediction %.Been running LS1.6 also, not won anything.I hope Guru makes some time to get LS1.8 finished soon for us paying customers.

Reply #6

BobP — Fri, 11 Feb 2005 08:15:17 GMT

LEAVE GURU:Alone.....develop, produce your own?????????????????????????????/programs.....software.......systems......etc....GO>>>>> to SUCCESS WITH LOTTERY SYSTEMS .......READ and get BUSY,Are you a customer/user waiting for your working copy of Lotto Sync?When the power goes out, do you advise your neighbors to make their own electric?We come up with systems here all the time, Lotto Sync is supposed to be one that actually works, or will be when finished. When would you like to start winning... [ More ]

Reply #5

RJOh — Thu, 10 Feb 2005 21:59:36 GMT

Reply #4

psykomo — Thu, 10 Feb 2005 21:46:22 GMT

LEAVE GURU:Alone.....develop, produce your own?????????????????????????????/programs.....software.......systems......etc....GO>>>>> to SUCCESS WITH LOTTERY SYSTEMS .......READ and get BUSY, ..................................................................................................................????develop your own...........buy ......others......don't complain............the software producer who meets the need..........the market.........BUY MORE.......GET............................R... [ More ]

Reply #3

paul762 — Thu, 10 Feb 2005 10:37:09 GMT

Quote: Originally posted by lottosyncman on February 10, 2005you know what i woldnt count on it!!!! i would just use the software provided and if somethng else pops up then thats a bonus!!!! you should really try 1.7 again it seems to give winning numbers at sample 20,000!!! guru do you have something to add here????I have to agree here, for 49 number games at least, 20000 seems to be the ideal sample.

Reply #2

BobP — Thu, 10 Feb 2005 07:33:28 GMT

First of all you should give some serious thought whether you want to lure potential customers into buying version 1.7 if they will be much happier with 1.8 down the road. People don't just buy the software and stare longingly at it, they put down real money on its picks.Considering a broken clock is correct twice a day. Here are the odds of having winning numbers in a 6/49 game when picking 6 and 10 numbers.6 of 6 - 1 in 13,983,816.00 and 1 in 66,589.605 of 6 - 1 in 54,200.84 and 1 in 1,422.8... [ More ]

Reply #1

lottosyncman — Thu, 10 Feb 2005 06:27:59 GMT

you know what i woldnt count on it!!!! i would just use the software provided and if somethng else pops up then thats a bonus!!!! you should really try 1.7 again it seems to give winning numbers at sample 20,000!!! guru do you have something to add here

Guru, yes or no ?

reddog — Thu, 10 Feb 2005 00:52:51 GMT

Is 1.8 going to be finished in March ? That's all I want to know. It's been 10 months. Yes or No.