<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
	<channel>
		<title>04 pair yearly comparison Texas</title>
		<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/107734</link>
		<atom:link href="https://www.lotterypost.com/rss/topic/107734" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<description>Lottery Post Forum Topic: 04 pair yearly comparison Texas</description>
		<dc:language>en-us</dc:language>
		<generator>Lottery Post RSS Generator</generator>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #7</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/107734/337242</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/107734/337242</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 17 Feb 2005 07:18:22 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Texasman</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>msmusic,Sorry, but I did not have the funds to play tonight as I was expecting a paycheck of sorts on Monday and the deal fell through...so, running on fumes right now.  I hate that, especially when I&#x27;m hot on the trail of a winner.  There will be other days...</p>]]></description>
			<category>Texasman</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #6</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/107734/337220</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/107734/337220</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 17 Feb 2005 05:53:02 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>msmusic</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Wtg Texasman  hope you won big. DIDN&#x27;T GET A CHANCE TO PLAY,</p>]]></description>
			<category>msmusic</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #5</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/107734/336936</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/107734/336936</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 16 Feb 2005 21:00:54 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Texasman</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for the analysis and observations. I will take that into account. (Don&#x27;t talk yourself out something - LOL)I went back to 2002 and there was one 04 pair in the same range of time. In 2001, I think one or none and in 2000 none in same time period. Yes, so it may just be one of those trends and may mean nothing.  But right now, 04 is still is overdue, based on the two previous years evening drawings.It&#x27;s a tough one. Do you just keep changing what you play everyday, or hang onto to a cer... &#x5b;&#xa0;<a href="https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/107734/336936">More</a>&#xa0;&#x5d;</p>]]></description>
			<category>Texasman</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #4</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/107734/336687</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/107734/336687</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 16 Feb 2005 15:08:29 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>MollyG</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Another thing to consider is....the ball sets.  TLC changes sets approximately every 6 months (give or take).  The ones they are currently using are 8 sets and they started in October,2004.  Prior to that, they were using 17 sets, which started, I think, in March,2004.  So! we can look forward to another ball set change in the next couple of months; who knows how many they will choose at that time.  It could be then before the 04 falls, or it could come out today on the next draw. (I do know, th... &#x5b;&#xa0;<a href="https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/107734/336687">More</a>&#xa0;&#x5d;</p>]]></description>
			<category>MollyG</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #3</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/107734/336617</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/107734/336617</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 16 Feb 2005 12:09:59 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>msmusic</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Texasman you have to look at the sequence of number prior to the arrival of the 04 to see want numbers generated them to fall. Just because there was a run of 04 in 2003 doesn&#x27;t mean it will be again. There are certain numbers that will start a rush on a certain pattern to play.</p>]]></description>
			<category>msmusic</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #2</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/107734/336566</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/107734/336566</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 16 Feb 2005 07:13:10 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Texasman</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>That&#x27;s pretty incredible, huh?  Are we to win tonight, this week, or ignore it?  04?...ALERT</p>]]></description>
			<category>Texasman</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #1</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/107734/336565</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/107734/336565</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 16 Feb 2005 07:10:36 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Texasman</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>2004:2/26/2004 0 4 8 2/25/2004 3 6 7 2/24/2004 2 0 1 2/23/2004 4 0 4 2/21/2004 0 4 9 2/20/2004 9 1 3 2/19/2004 2 2 4 2/18/2004 3 3 4 2/17/2004 8 4 8 2/16/2004 4 8 0 2/14/2004 0 4 5</p>]]></description>
			<category>Texasman</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>04 pair yearly comparison Texas</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/107734</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/107734</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 16 Feb 2005 07:07:09 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Texasman</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>2/18/2003 7 4 0 2/17/2003 1 4 0 2/15/2003 3 3 1 2/14/2003 6 4 7 2/13/2003 7 7 5 2/12/2003 6 9 9 2/11/2003 6 4 7 2/10/2003 0 1 4 Above is a sample of 04 pairs at same time of year for 2003.  Look at 2004 in next post below this.  So, are we due for the 04 pair now</p>]]></description>
			<category>Texasman</category>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

