Numbers and draw date magnetism

Reply #66

Rip Snorter — Mon, 04 Jul 2005 04:55:45 GMT

I suppose so.J

Reply #65

LOTTOMIKE — Fri, 01 Jul 2005 10:26:30 GMT

probably just coincidence

Reply #64

Rip Snorter — Tue, 31 May 2005 14:54:46 GMT

No problem.Good luck.Jack

Reply #63

NewClub — Tue, 31 May 2005 14:32:31 GMT

Well, if I become a believer, then I would work on it, and feed you back with my new discovery. Isn't that the reason we are discussing here?If I do not believe it, I will just wait for you to work on it. One less brain contribution.

Reply #62

Rip Snorter — Tue, 31 May 2005 12:49:47 GMT

Your agreement isn't a necessary element in my life. However, if you back test the method I just PMed you it ought to get the job done. Combining that method with the 'date' method should give you the hole in probability theory you're looking for. Plugging in some other methods you can find on other threads will get it down to 20 numbers most times.Jack

Reply #61

NewClub — Tue, 31 May 2005 12:24:06 GMT

Rip Snorter, I am a scientist, I need control experiment. Let' mess up with the date and perform a similar analysis. If you can still get some patterns, that means those are just spikes in statistical deviation. If pattern dissapears, then I would agree there is something there.

Reply #60

Rip Snorter — Fri, 27 May 2005 21:22:04 GMT

LottoMike: I'll concede that humans wouldn't be opposed to conspiracy if they thought they could get by with it, or if there was sufficient monetary gain, even if they figured they might get caught.But we humans are fairly stupid in a lot of ways, fickle, jealous, and when we buy one another we can't be depended upon to stay bought. That's why I rule out a conspiracy.So maybe it's just coincidence. Maybe it's flawed machinery misbehaving in ways we aren't looking hard enough to detect, all ma... [ More ]

Reply #59

Rip Snorter — Fri, 27 May 2005 20:34:37 GMT

Mike:This is from a couple of pages back, but it still probably applies: Seems to me there's another alternative to flawed machines, conspiracies, mistakes and anomalies with the process. These drawings are taking place over a wide range of geographies and administrative structures, methods of generating them going from computers to physical ball flyers. They're just too widespread for there to be any conspiracy involved, but too strangely, unexplainedly consistent and persistent I'm willing... [ More ]

Reply #58

LOTTOMIKE — Fri, 27 May 2005 18:44:06 GMT

wouldn't it be something if the balls were influenced this whole time behind the scenes and manipulated and weighted to come in but we just never caught on,for instance powerball started hitting a lot early this year and now there is another major jackpot run.could those technical difficulties the other night on powerball really be something going on there that we don't know about

Reply #57

Rip Snorter — Fri, 27 May 2005 13:41:10 GMT

Something mildly interesting: Wed, May 25, 2005 Powerball 27-29-31-42-46, Powerball: 33Sat, May 25, 2002 Powerball 09-29-30-33-42, Powerball: 27Four of the same numbers drawn on the same date, three years apart means the coincidence coordinators are doing some fancy acrobatics, seems to me.Jack

Reply #56

Rip Snorter — Fri, 13 May 2005 15:25:11 GMT

Not a problem, Mike.A person scouting around looking for numbers to play on a 13th of the month drawing might find himself attracted to some of these, provided he sees things mostly in black and white:PB 11/13/20045626333413PB 10/13/200451417454641PB 3/13/200411444548502PB 12/13/2003171925264419PB 9/13/200361019283239PB 8/13/2003263135444832PB 11/13/2002182331385020PB 7/13/20023223742498 PB 5/13/20001327384224MM 5/13/2003172047495034TX 5/13/2000 122425293334TX 5/13/1998 51418363945 J... [ More ]

Reply #55

LOTTOMIKE — Fri, 13 May 2005 09:39:03 GMT

thanks for the info....

Reply #54

Rip Snorter — Tue, 10 May 2005 02:58:54 GMT

Here's a history of all the Powerball, Mega Millions and TX Lotto drawings on the 10th of May: Powerball5/10/2003126102038MM5/10/20021735384910TX Lotto5/10/2000 142332374145TX Lotto5/10/1997 121522384047 Looks as though only 10, 38 and 1 are lovelorn about May 10. Jack

Reply #53

Rip Snorter — Sun, 08 May 2005 13:25:21 GMT

I see the quilt thing isn't working.... the colors cause the numbers to be unreadable on my screen after I made that last edit. So here are the same draws and numbers in black and white, back before they invented color:CAN Sup 7CAN 5/7/200551117252647Sup Lotto SSLS 5/7/200531013242647Tx Lotto5/7/2005172425263333CA LottoCA 5/7/2005121419434719PB5/7/2005212339444719MM past5/7/1999122130354915MM past5/7/200222226394011MM past5/7/2004141719445017PB past5/7/2003131834355128Tx Lotto past5/7/200311117... [ More ]

Reply #52

Rip Snorter — Sun, 08 May 2005 12:54:29 GMT

I dunno, Mike. If someone's doing it, they go way back and cut a wide geographical swath. It's difficult to imagine why they'd do it, want the same numbers to hit during the same dates over so many years and so many lotteries. Here's a complete history of MM, Texas Lotto and PB draws on the 6th and 7th of May, along with current from CA Lotto, Canada, Super Lotto South, etc:CAN Sup 7CAN 5/7/200551117252647Sup Lotto SSLS 5/7/200531013242647Tx Lotto5/7/2005172425263333CA LottoCA 5/7/20051214194... [ More ]

Reply #51

LOTTOMIKE — Sat, 07 May 2005 03:09:12 GMT

i don't think the balls could be if security measures are in place...

Reply #50

LOTTOMIKE — Sat, 07 May 2005 03:08:24 GMT

does anybody think the balls could be messed with

Reply #49

Rip Snorter — Wed, 04 May 2005 02:29:44 GMT

Likely that's probably it. One of those things that just happens from time to time. If it happened on Mega Millions tonight, however, this would probably include a lot of the numbers that hit: 45678131416192021222728293539404748The proof of the pudding, my old granny used to say, is in the teeth you break eating it.Jack

Reply #48

JAG331 — Wed, 04 May 2005 00:08:50 GMT

Aye,I'm still looking over the numbers in CT's Pick 5 and Pick 6 games. Unfortunately the 5/35 and 6/44 matrices are not all that similar.I think konane has a good point...these things happen from time to time, and we notice them because they do match. Think of all the occasions when the numbers don't match.

Reply #47

Rip Snorter — Mon, 02 May 2005 14:39:01 GMT

Correction..... it's too late to edit that, so I'll just post it .... disregard those numbers up there. Here are the ones I should have posted .... numbers I believe will be rearing their heads, sniffing the air, whinnying and trotting off to join the herds:23491418192629303236374142454649Jack

Reply #46

Rip Snorter — Mon, 02 May 2005 13:51:56 GMT

Seems that if any of us could figure it out we'd be sitting pretty with the winning ticket. It's actually a phenomena which drives people nuts trying to figure it out, to control it ... including lottery directors. If you have a handle on it, am all ears!! there is any form of conspiracy to effect outcomes of ball-drop drawings, it is the best kept secret in the world.However I do NOT have the same degree of faith in random number generators currently being used by lotteries too slack to per... [ More ]

Reply #45

konane — Mon, 02 May 2005 12:57:48 GMT

Back when Lotto World Magazine was being published in the early-mid 90's there were many articles about how balls were weighed machines tested, how handlers of balls wore gloves when placing them in the machines to prdvent even the weight of hand oil from influencing the outcome of draws, how both pre-tests of ballsets were done prior to drawings, same with post-tests to assure randomness, ballsets periodically retired. At that time they cited Texas as a lottery offering the the greatest amou... [ More ]

Reply #44

Rip Snorter — Mon, 02 May 2005 12:09:02 GMT

Aye:I hope no one believed I was suggesting there's any human hand or conspiracy causing all this. I don't. If anything I'd suppose there was a tacit agreement on the part of all parties, such as the lottery management, not to give the matter a lot of attention, assuming they know it.Here's what the MM site tells you when you go there to download history of past draws:Lottery games such as Mega Millions are random and it is impossible for anyone or any lottery analysis software to predict exac... [ More ]

Reply #43

konane — Mon, 02 May 2005 01:02:14 GMT

Reply #42

Rip Snorter — Mon, 02 May 2005 00:55:54 GMT

I'd guess the more closely you examine what you're observing here, the more inclined you're going to be to cease discussing it until you have an opportunity to digest what you discover. After that you'll continue feeling that inclination for other reasons.Just a guess.Jack

Reply #41

konane — Mon, 02 May 2005 00:51:36 GMT

Looks like number affinities on a larger scale. I believe some posters call it traveling numbers. It seems to be most quickly noticeable in Cash 3 where certain two number combinations seem to hit in several states for a couple of days then change to another two somewhere else. What you pointed out with ..... Results of 4-30-05PowerBall 8-15-17-32-48+24LOTTO South 3-15-17-18-25-35Hoosier Lotto 15-17-19-21-23-37.......has also happened in GA with Mega Millions, Lotto South and GA Fantasy 5 wit... [ More ]

Reply #40

ayenowitall — Mon, 02 May 2005 00:00:26 GMT

JAG,Just for the record, let me say that I'm not suggesting that there is any kind of fraud or conspiracy. It's more of a synergy. I've noticed this sort of thing going on between these three games for quite some time. It doesn't always happen, but it does happen often enough to get your attention. I just wish that I could figure out some rhyme or reason to it. I can't help but think that it would give me a pretty good leg up on busting one of these games if I could figure out which two (or more... [ More ]

Reply #39

JAG331 — Sun, 01 May 2005 19:30:06 GMT

I've noticed a lot of similarities between two of Connecticut's games. Classic Lotto and Cash 5...but I'm not sure if it's just my imagination trying to see things that aren't really there. Let me do some research.

Reply #38

ayenowitall — Sun, 01 May 2005 13:30:06 GMT

Quote: Originally posted by ayenowitall on April 28, 2005Results of 4-27-05PowerBall: 11-13-18-32-42+4LOTTO South: 4-7-18-24-46-47Hoosier Lotto: 4-18-32-36-43-46Interesting....but I have no idea what it means or how it can be used.aye'It happened again! I just happen to notice because I play all three of these games.Results of 4-30-05PowerBall 8-15-17-32-48+24LOTTO South 3-15-17-18-25-35Hoosier Lotto 15-17-19-21-23-37What's up with this phenomenon?aye

Reply #37

Rip Snorter — Sat, 30 Apr 2005 02:09:07 GMT

Not a good showing for the magnetic 28. Those five 17s muscled up to the trough, and everyone else pushed and shoved until those poor old 28s just had to take the bottom scrapings. Every day, the sage asserts, ain't a good one to pick the date as one of your numbers. CA Fan 5 4/28/2005 5 18 24 25 27 TX Cash 5 4/28/2005 3 18 22 25 32 CN Cash 5 4/28/2005 1 6 7 21 25 FL Fan 5 4/28/2005 15 19 25 26 28 CO Cash 5 4/28/2005 2 11 15 17 21 IL LL 4/28/2005 17 22 30 34 37 NM RR 4/28/2005 15 17 27 30 33... [ More ]

Reply #36

Rip Snorter — Fri, 29 Apr 2005 13:42:05 GMT

Mike:Seems interesting to me, also. But insofar as this draw/date magnetism premise, I'm not sure it helps much. Drawing date was the 27th, but 27 only hit three times among these 11 large draws. Not even a third of the draws. 8 hit four times out of the 11, 25 hit four times, 30 hit four times. Which seems to indicate the date of the draw mightn't have had much influence on why 27 hit 3 out of 11.Three out of 11 was just about the average, thinks I, for any numbers that hit more than once.... [ More ]

Reply #35

LOTTOMIKE — Fri, 29 Apr 2005 02:19:06 GMT

very interesting.......

Reply #34

Rip Snorter — Fri, 29 Apr 2005 02:15:20 GMT

Within the mostly six number draws across the nation I think we all ought to doff our hats out of respect for the surprising run at randomness made yesterday by 6, 8, 11, 21, 26, 27. 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, and 37. They all got the same idea at once, but you can't take it away from them that they made one heck of a try, considering. Seems a few others got the idea, as well, but couldn't make it through the jammed doorway.Not to suggest their synchronicity could be used to predict anything, but it... [ More ]

Reply #33

Rip Snorter — Thu, 28 Apr 2005 14:41:36 GMT

Not to seem nit-picking, but the ennui of watching those same numbers re-run year after year during April with that random sameness nobody could use to predict anything just drives me up the wall. Yes, it does. Anyone who says it ain't so just hasn't taken a look into my interior lately. 4/30/2003 7 13 17 32 33 35 4/28/2004 27 34 42 49 52 23 4/27/2005 11 13 18 32 42 4 4/26/2005 18 22 33 34 42 16 4/26/2003 5 11 15 22 36 31 4/24/2004 2 13 22 35 44 28 4/23/2005 8 9 13 15 50 9 4/23/2003 14 15 23 3... [ More ]

Reply #32

Rip Snorter — Thu, 28 Apr 2005 13:11:08 GMT

I know what you mean, Aye. The entire month of April's been that way with PB and MM. Same old boring numbers over and over, no way of predicting any of them. It's a wonder anyone bothers to look at them or tries to figure them out: PB 4/27/2005 11 13 18 32 42 4 MM 4/26/2005 18 22 33 34 42 16 PB 4/23/2005 8 9 13 15 50 9 MM 4/22/2005 23 25 43 46 49 26 PB 4/20/2005 7 16 33 34 36 27 MM 4/19/2005 5 6 14 42 47 3 PB 4/16/2005 11 38 44 45 51 41 MM 4/15/2005 25 26 37 39 49 29 PB 4/13/2005 6 13 37 51 5... [ More ]

Reply #31

ayenowitall — Thu, 28 Apr 2005 10:47:19 GMT

Results of 4-27-05PowerBall: 11-13-18-32-42+4LOTTO South: 4-7-18-24-46-47Hoosier Lotto: 4-18-32-36-43-46Interesting....but I have no idea what it means or how it can be used.aye

Reply #30

Rip Snorter — Sun, 24 Apr 2005 12:09:32 GMT

Maybe it will help to visualize it as the way it might appear to the numerical equivalent of a large planeload of skydivers, chutes open, looking down on the geography trying to decide which state fairgrounds to land in, aiming for where their buddies are, avoiding where their numerical siblings have already landed. PB 4/23/2005 8 9 13 15 50 9 GA F5 4/23/2005 5 14 26 30 32 WV Cash25 4/23/2005 4 5 11 12 13 23 PA Match 4/23/2005 13 17 27 33 36 44 DC Hot5 4/23/2005 7 8 10 14 23 DC Quik 4/23/2005 3... [ More ]

Reply #29

Rip Snorter — Sun, 24 Apr 2005 03:35:33 GMT

Too many numbers, too few colors is all. Sorry.Jack

Reply #28

LuckyFoxTerrier — Sun, 24 Apr 2005 02:24:50 GMT

Jack, I get into a rhythm looking at your quilts.... then I see a number in the same color that is different and it throws it off. I must be missing something? There must be a reason you put, for instance 34, 24, and 17 all in lime green? Help me get it !! Please!! lft

Reply #27

Rip Snorter — Sun, 24 Apr 2005 02:15:58 GMT

Sort of interesting: 3/23/2005 23 29 37 40 45 38 2/23/2005 4 10 15 48 51 13 11/23/2004 8 30 32 35 51 17 10/23/2004 15 24 49 50 52 40 7/23/2004 5 12 25 35 37 12 6/23/2004 9 12 16 20 39 1 4/23/2004 8 22 25 47 48 27 3/23/2004 12 22 35 39 46 32 7/23/2003 4 16 34 37 51 38 4/23/2003 14 15 23 31 51 34But maybe it's just that time of the month: MM 4/22/2005 23 25 43 46 49 26 GA F5 4/22/2005 5 14 26 30 32 WV Cash25 4/22/2005 4 5 11 12 13 23 PA Match 4/22/2005 13 17 27 33 36 44 DC Hot5 4/22/2005 7 8 10 14... [ More ]

Reply #26

LuckyFoxTerrier — Fri, 15 Apr 2005 19:17:24 GMT

You always make me have a good laugh, Jack, and keep this thing in perspective! ha! Thanks for working up the numbers for mega on the 15th. I'm gonna go buy some tickets in a few hours! :) Wish me luck! I'm going to base at least one ticket on this chart just for fun, if nothing else!LuckyFox

Reply #25

Rip Snorter — Fri, 15 Apr 2005 17:49:44 GMT

LFT:Here's a combined MMPB chart of recent drawings on the 15th of the month. MM blue, PB yellow. 3/15/2005 14 26 27 34 44 27 2/15/2005 3 16 20 21 38 10 1/15/2005 21 26 37 49 51 25 12/15/2004 1 6 11 38 53 11 4 8 24 30 36 25 10/15/2004 9/15/2004 1 8 17 28 50 20 18 23 27 29 44 24 6/15/2004 5/15/2004 1 26 27 43 46 31 11/15/2003 8 20 22 32 52 39PB only draws on the 16th: 2/16/2005 21 25 27 41 48 25 6/16/2004 16 18 26 39 48 22 8/16/2003 13 15 20 37 42 7 7/16/2003 18 27 28 30 49 20 4/16/2003... [ More ]

Reply #24

LuckyFoxTerrier — Fri, 15 Apr 2005 03:31:32 GMT

Glad to be back! Missed you guys!!LF

Reply #23

Rip Snorter — Fri, 15 Apr 2005 02:28:15 GMT

I wonder if our terrorist attack influenced those numbers, or was that date carrying it's own magnetism prior to that? Maybe both. Maybe neither. It's intriguing, anyway.Welcome back LFT.Jack

Reply #22

LuckyFoxTerrier — Fri, 15 Apr 2005 01:09:30 GMT

Jack, Whew, another great thread, man! Thank you! Loving your quilts . Hey, am I seeing what you're seeing ...... numbers and derivatives of numbers hitting in correlation with date numbers? For instance, I keep noticing 9's and 11's and 1's popping up together. I wonder if our terrorist attack influenced those numbers, or was that date carrying it's own magnetism prior to that? And I see even numbers on even days, such as 2's and 4's, and then 24's and such ........This relationship thing... [ More ]

Reply #21

Rip Snorter — Sun, 10 Apr 2005 12:16:43 GMT

Your heading to this topic refered to the magnatism . I do think you half to consider the difficulty of being able to choose 5 or 6 numbers based on magnatism alone.example: I have 5 grandchildern aging 1 to 10, I can baby sit 1 and control them with no problem, 2 little problem , but all 5 , lord help me they would be out of control, and I would end up in a strait jacket.I think it is the same with numbers it is basically easy to determine 1 or 2 but all of them based off one system. or one ide... [ More ]

Reply #20

Rip Snorter — Sun, 10 Apr 2005 05:01:20 GMT

For anyone interested, here's what the PB draws look like on the 13 of the month: 11/13/2004 5 6 26 33 34 13 10/13/2004 5 14 17 45 46 41 3/13/2004 11 44 45 48 50 2 12/13/2003 17 19 25 26 44 19 9/13/2003 6 10 19 28 32 39 8/13/2003 26 31 35 44 48 32 11/13/2002 18 23 31 38 50 20 7/13/2002 3 22 37 42 49 8And here are the 4th draws of the month for 2004-2005:Smoke'em if you've got'em. 3/12/2005 7 23 40 46 52 41 2/12/2005 18 21 28 49 50 16 1/12/2005 21 23 27 38 50 38 12/11/2004 6 7 16 41 53 23 11/13/2... [ More ]

Reply #19

Rip Snorter — Sun, 10 Apr 2005 04:31:13 GMT

Aye:Looking pretty good in that way, Aye. 1 slipped up on me entirely this draw, 46 was rejected from my picks because I thought it was too soon to hit... I figured on the next draw. 35 was in the running for a pick but was a tier down from my picks.... missed it, but it got close scrutiny because of a series of hits 11/3/04, 11/27/04, and 12/8/04, then dropped out of sight until 3/16/05. It hit again 3/26/05, causing it to appear to be on another cycle of 3 intermittent hits. It's a phenome... [ More ]

Reply #18

ayenowitall — Sun, 10 Apr 2005 03:34:38 GMT

Jack,The PowerBall numbers came 1-11-35-46-53+29 tonight. (29 reduces to master number 11 and 46 reduces to 10.) Maybe there is something to draw date magnetism for the 9,10, and 11 on the third draw of the month. Good luck on finding a way to harness the power.aye

Reply #17

Rip Snorter — Sun, 10 Apr 2005 03:09:07 GMT

Long odds, Mike.Jack

Reply #16

LOTTOMIKE — Sun, 10 Apr 2005 02:50:33 GMT

as in the powerball drawing......

Reply #15

LOTTOMIKE — Sun, 10 Apr 2005 02:49:43 GMT

they ought to have winnings if you have two white balls....

Reply #14

Rip Snorter — Fri, 08 Apr 2005 13:43:50 GMT

Thanks Todd. A worthy suggestion. Here's how they look without the Red Balls.third draws: 10 17 20 23 45 9 11 22 24 43 13 17 35 45 50 14 21 29 43 45 1 3 10 47 48 2 4 28 33 52 5 10 29 33 51 16 17 23 26 44 1 31 33 37 50 3 9 17 37 43 2 9 30 47 48 10 20 22 41 49 5 16 28 50 52 2 13 19 27 50 4 17 26 37 40 5 8 24 38 529th of the month draws: 9 10 15 18 29 1 3 10 47 48 1 31 33 37 50 18 23 25 26 40 19 21 26 31 51 6 28 35 38 51Jack

Reply #13

Todd — Fri, 08 Apr 2005 12:41:09 GMT

Jack,One thing you may want to try in your analysis is to remove the Powerball number from the chart.There are differing opinions on this, but mine is that the Powerball is drawn from a completely separate ball machine, and and completely separate ballset. Therefore, it shares nothing in common (physically) with the other five numbers, and should not be analyzed together with the five. To me, including the Powerball in the analysis clouds the picture.Again, others may not see it that way, but

Reply #12

LOTTOMIKE — Fri, 08 Apr 2005 11:47:15 GMT

rip snorter ever read nostradamus,i think he's interesting......

Reply #11

Rip Snorter — Fri, 08 Apr 2005 08:34:05 GMT

aye'No apologies needed, no offense here. No hits, no runs, no errors. Hope the trouble you took reading pays off in non-magnetic numbers anytime you play them.Jack

Reply #10

ayenowitall — Fri, 08 Apr 2005 06:54:58 GMT

Jack,I apologize for offending you with my inquiry. I suppose that mystical matters simply don't lend themselves to rational scrutiny. I'll leave this one to you and others who are already believers in draw date magnetism. I'll also be looking for 9, 10, and 11 tomorrow night.aye

Reply #9

Rip Snorter — Fri, 08 Apr 2005 04:02:18 GMT

Ahhh. Thanks Mark.I'm going to think on your post before replying.Jack

Reply #8

Rip Snorter — Fri, 08 Apr 2005 03:59:24 GMT

I'm going to take one more shot at this, see if it falls completely flat. But maybe someone out there will be interested and care to talk about it. Maybe even see some things in it that I haven't seen. That's the kind of thing I'd like to see, or, failing that, quit bothering with it.Think of this as a quilt. A quilt with numbers on it. Numbers that communicate the exact same ones as rode around on the very balls that were drawn on Power Ball, 3rd draws of the month since 11/03 on the dates... [ More ]

Reply #7

mark — Fri, 08 Apr 2005 03:56:39 GMT

Rip,don't be discouraged I do I do see some what of a pattern as you do.Here in In. on the powerball play slips we can choose as meny numbers as we like and also mark Q.P. and the computer will pick the rest, what i have been doing lately is taking the 5 number drawn ,placing one in each of the play areas and letting the computer pick the, the reason is the pattern I have been seeing where a number from the previous draw has been returning in the next draw.So far it hasn't returned me any money... [ More ]

Reply #6

Rip Snorter — Thu, 07 Apr 2005 23:32:01 GMT

ayenowitall:I suppose I should explain how I see boundaries on these kinds of issues. I don't have an investment in anyone seeing things as I do, understanding as I understand them. This is a mystical forum. One of the things I enjoy about discussions here is that they frequently involve things I don't understand, don't agree with, or don't care about. I cull out the ones in the last group, don't read them. I sometimes read the second group, but don't post on them. But in the first group I... [ More ]

Reply #5

Rip Snorter — Thu, 07 Apr 2005 22:33:09 GMT

ayenowitall:If you can't see anything there, then it probably isn't there. If others do, guess it's just there for them, not you.JMMGuy:Yep. MB and PB are tough ones. You ought to be able to get pretty good with the white balls, though, if you work at it. If you don't, maybe something will be posted yet to help you along.Hang in there.Jack

Reply #4

ayenowitall — Thu, 07 Apr 2005 22:08:58 GMT

Jack,Exactly what is this sort of thing that you're seeing in those charts? My experience has been that if you look long enough at enough numbers, you can find just about anything you want. I'm not pouring cold water on your idea; I just don't see anything that might be useful in predicting numbers. What is it that I'm missing?aye

Reply #3

MMGuy — Thu, 07 Apr 2005 21:09:55 GMT

Ever since you posted that topic a strange experience I have been trying to pick numbers that are probably gonna come up or are due to come up. I got two numbers and some numbers that were close on megamillions on tuesday. No luck on the mb though.

Reply #2

Rip Snorter — Thu, 07 Apr 2005 17:05:32 GMT

Yep. I've always been one to worry more about looks than substance.Good luck back atchaJack

Reply #1

Todd — Thu, 07 Apr 2005 16:58:11 GMT

Looks like a quilt.

Numbers and draw date magnetism

Rip Snorter — Thu, 07 Apr 2005 16:12:27 GMT

Any ideas on why this sort of thing happens in this reality where it's all luck and the numbers are all random? 4/2/2005 5 9 11 17 46 39 2/2/2005 10 11 16 40 44 2 10/2/2004 2 13 29 32 35 4 6/2/2004 5 6 12 26 29 30 8/2/2003 17 40 41 42 46 25 7/2/2003 16 17 24 26 45 36 6/2/2004 5 6 12 26 29 30 8/2/2003 17 40 41 42 46 25 4/2/2003 12 17 35 47 50 13 2/9/2005 9 10 15 18 29 9 10/9/2004 1 3 10 47 48 27 6/9/2004 1 31 33 37 50 40 8/9/2003 18 23 25 26 40 15 7/9/2003 19 21 26 31 51 40 4/9/2003 6 28 35 38 51... [ More ]