Geographical numerical egalitarianism

Reply #1

Rip Snorter — Mon, 25 Apr 2005 13:04:16 GMT

Shocking. Low company for everyone on the 23rd. Aside from that 50 on PB, the highest number to hit was 43. Yeah, 43. The gossip mongers among you will prick up your ears on that one. I'd guess she's preening a bit from all the attention I gave her on my blog the other day, but you'll notice she's not with her old gang.However, drawing this back to numerical geographical egalitarianism. Discipline's what's needed here, not all this rambling off in all directions following the activities of... [ More ]

Geographical numerical egalitarianism

Rip Snorter — Sun, 24 Apr 2005 17:03:35 GMT

I'm prone to thinking of everywhere outside New Mexico as pretty much the same place. I'm particularly gratified to see that evidently, the numbers feel the same way. This chart demonstrates conclusively that the numbers figure Houston, Washington DC, NYC, Boston, Savannah, Miami and Sacramento, CA and someplace in West Virginia are generally equal in terms of a numerical place to grab a chair, pull back your hat to wipe the sweat off your brow and give the waitress a sly wink when you order... [ More ]