<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
	<channel>
		<title>PA Evening Trend Analysis</title>
		<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/114492</link>
		<atom:link href="https://www.lotterypost.com/rss/topic/114492" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<description>Lottery Post Forum Topic: PA Evening Trend Analysis</description>
		<dc:language>en-us</dc:language>
		<generator>Lottery Post RSS Generator</generator>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #3</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/114492/395633</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/114492/395633</guid>
			<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jun 2005 16:11:15 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>CalifDude</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Doing  back testing  of the above (not a good test!!) I am going to show which draws you would have won by playing all 55 numbers (* at the far right) and the draws you would have won by limiting it to just the draws with 1 repeat digit (** at the far right). Of course, if you did play all 55 each time, then you would have won anywhere you see a * or **.Remember that back testing usually (and this is one of those cases) does not prove anything because if you use past history to develop a method</p>]]></description>
			<category>CalifDude</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #2</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/114492/395626</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/114492/395626</guid>
			<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jun 2005 15:58:26 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>CalifDude</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Thank you, BA.  It gets tricky when there was a double since you have only 2 digits to use and can&#x27;t use the same double in your picks!  So, my confidence level for this particular draw is low, but I did play those 14 tickets on line.  When I can afford it, I try to put my money where my mouth is</p>]]></description>
			<category>CalifDude</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #1</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/114492/395621</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/114492/395621</guid>
			<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jun 2005 15:54:27 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Blackapple</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Good picks I will be watching.</p>]]></description>
			<category>Blackapple</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>PA Evening Trend Analysis</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/114492</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/114492</guid>
			<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jun 2005 15:17:14 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>CalifDude</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Per request, I am doing a trend analysis on PA Evening draws.  I have shown this for two states (MN and TN) in another thread.  This is NOT my current method for the states that I predict, but I will probably (starting tomorrow) do it for MN, TN and PA Evening since I have done the work!Here is the analysis with an explanation at the end:Thu, Jun 9, 2005 9-1-1 O/L -/* 2Wed, Jun 8, 2005 4-1-1 E/L -/* 0Tue, Jun 7, 2005 9-0-0 O/L -/- 1Mon, Jun 6, 2005 6-9-7 E/H */* 1Sun, Jun 5, 2005 0-5-7 E/H -/* 1... &#x5b;&#xa0;<a href="https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/114492">More</a>&#xa0;&#x5d;</p>]]></description>
			<category>CalifDude</category>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

