<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
	<channel>
		<title>success in your number selection</title>
		<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/114574</link>
		<atom:link href="https://www.lotterypost.com/rss/topic/114574" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<description>Lottery Post Forum Topic: success in your number selection</description>
		<dc:language>en-us</dc:language>
		<generator>Lottery Post RSS Generator</generator>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #7</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/114574/397082</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/114574/397082</guid>
			<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jun 2005 20:06:04 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Maverick</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>I didn&#x27;t keep detailed records, but GH&#x27;s # selection methods definately helped me pick  more/closer  winning #&#x27;s then when I just picked #&#x27;s from nowhere. I guess it&#x27;s a matter of luck + using the right charts at the right time.I just need a break from the strict charting, and so far my  laying in bed technique/listening to my instincts  has not done worse than charting. I will eventually go back to charting.</p>]]></description>
			<category>Maverick</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #6</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/114574/396744</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/114574/396744</guid>
			<pubDate>Sun, 12 Jun 2005 23:33:47 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>catdaddy</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>I have not use the software in 1 1/2 yrs since I purchased it 2yrs agoBut when I did use it I might spent 20 bucks on a wheel most time win noting  from Catdaddy</p>]]></description>
			<category>catdaddy</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #5</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/114574/396723</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/114574/396723</guid>
			<pubDate>Sun, 12 Jun 2005 21:42:26 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>RJOh</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Has either of you kept track of your wins/lost using that software?  I was wondering how it compared with other software or systems.  Three years ago I matched 5of6 in a 649 game with my homemade software and I was ahead for a good part of that year but by year&#x27;s end I was back down to winning back 55% of what I spent and that was the best year I ever had. Normally I win back about 10-20% of what I spend.  I might do better if I played the pick3 games more but I prefer the pick5&#x27;s and jackpot ga... &#x5b;&#xa0;<a href="https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/114574/396723">More</a>&#xa0;&#x5d;</p>]]></description>
			<category>RJOh</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #4</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/114574/396711</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/114574/396711</guid>
			<pubDate>Sun, 12 Jun 2005 21:19:57 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Maverick</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>I used her A+ too, and her wheeling books.</p>]]></description>
			<category>Maverick</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #3</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/114574/396417</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/114574/396417</guid>
			<pubDate>Sat, 11 Jun 2005 23:24:17 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>catdaddy</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>The software is gail howard&#x27;s Advantage Plus and Wheel Five PlusFrom Catdaddy</p>]]></description>
			<category>catdaddy</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #2</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/114574/396395</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/114574/396395</guid>
			<pubDate>Sat, 11 Jun 2005 22:01:15 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Maverick</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Which software program are you speaking of? Yea I saw success too, but not necessarily a big hit... but eh success is success lol. You&#x27;re right about not all the time, and luck definately is involved even still.Gut instinct which is recommended by Robert Perkis is becoming a tried and true method for me, so far. In my experience it ranks right up there with software programs... which leads me to believe that software/methods are just like exercise routines. They all do work/help, but not all the... &#x5b;&#xa0;<a href="https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/114574/396395">More</a>&#xa0;&#x5d;</p>]]></description>
			<category>Maverick</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #1</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/114574/396327</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/114574/396327</guid>
			<pubDate>Sat, 11 Jun 2005 18:46:25 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>MillionsWanted</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Is there any lottery software programs which keep track of its own success at hitting the numbers?This would make it easier to chose strategy if tested at earlier draws.</p>]]></description>
			<category>MillionsWanted</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>success in your number selection</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/114574</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/114574</guid>
			<pubDate>Sat, 11 Jun 2005 17:21:37 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>catdaddy</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Yes sometimes if you study the different chart&#x27;s in the software programyou will see success in your number selection but not all the timeyou also need good old Fashion luck to really  be successfulthankscatdaddy</p>]]></description>
			<category>catdaddy</category>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

