Coincident occurrence - 1-ply vs. 2-ply

Reply #3

time*treat — Sun, 19 Jun 2005 02:25:37 GMT

You may be on to something there. I don't use RNG's either. I should have stated this topic differently. I meant that if the lottery uses a number generator to get a number and then uses that number as input to a second number generator, then is it possible to create a single function that mimics the same output? If a lottery game used such a method (multiple number generators) then would we not actually be looking at non-evenly spaced draws.Here is an example:before draw time, the lottery runs... [ More ]

Reply #2

SirMetro — Sat, 18 Jun 2005 17:07:37 GMT

I do something that is what I think would be relatively similiar with my Cash 3 and 4 games. Difference is, I measure the frequency of hits over varying time frames, then compare the results and identify only the numbers that match in each position. Cash 3 hasn't worked so well, but Cash4 produces decent results with just a few numbers to play (actually won the first nite I tested it). It is one of my ways to reduce my list of numbers.I just don't do the RNG thing because I figure a Cash 3 numbe... [ More ]

Reply #1

time*treat — Fri, 17 Jun 2005 20:18:58 GMT

Hmm, I thought someone would have at least challenged my theory by now, or at least tried to postulate an answer to the question. I guess everyone is feeling uninspired this week.

Coincident occurrence - 1-ply vs. 2-ply

time*treat — Tue, 14 Jun 2005 19:04:59 GMT

1-ply vs. 2-ply lotteries. Whether you consider a ply to refer to the game of chess or toilet paper On a 'news' thread, we were kicking around the idea of someone who found the RNG that matched a real lottery game. I commented that you could do well enough without knowing the exact system a game used. And might do even better. Here's how I = the Lottery, you = the player. I'll use single digit numbers for simplicity. I have an RNG, Sys_A. Every day, I run Sys_A up to 10,000 times for 'testing... [ More ]