has anyone ever won big using a GH system

Reply #37

pacattack05 — Tue, 05 Jul 2005 16:52:42 GMT

I agree. Susan saran wrap??? Are you kidding? Now Cindy Crawford, that's hot

Reply #36

Todd — Tue, 05 Jul 2005 15:50:22 GMT

NOT

Reply #35

neugan — Tue, 05 Jul 2005 14:25:38 GMT

Thank you luckyhorse, I will keep that in mind

Reply #34

luckyhorse — Tue, 05 Jul 2005 05:39:31 GMT

here is the link www.smartluck.com just remember before buying this software this is no magic bullet it guides you into making intelligent number choices but the final decision on a number is yours dont just rely on smart picks use smart picks to narrow down your selection hope this advice helps

Reply #33

neugan — Tue, 05 Jul 2005 05:12:18 GMT

I am new here. You guys were talking about GH system. Where can I get to take a look on the system? can any of you give me the link? Thank you.

Reply #32

spock — Mon, 27 Jun 2005 21:30:16 GMT

She is not only attractive but she has brains as well.

Reply #31

Mike444 — Mon, 27 Jun 2005 17:47:22 GMT

Personal opinion:Susan Sarandon was NOT hot even back in the 70'sand she is certainly NOT an atractive woman today.

Reply #30

Pick-4_Master — Sun, 26 Jun 2005 19:30:41 GMT

Susan Sarandon is HOT

Reply #29

MillionsWanted — Sun, 26 Jun 2005 11:25:57 GMT

Must wonder if they're just kidding.No matter what, she is no Susan Sarandon.

Reply #28

luckyhorse — Sun, 26 Jun 2005 02:24:15 GMT

do you people need glasses or what??? no wonder yu cant pick winning numbers you cant see them lmao!!!!! no offense gail

Reply #27

Maverick — Sun, 26 Jun 2005 01:07:51 GMT

She also has later pics in the newspaper clippings with some of her winners, and she is looking yummy

Reply #26

Maverick — Sun, 26 Jun 2005 01:06:48 GMT

Tis true. I guess we'll never know the true #'s.

Reply #25

MillionsWanted — Sun, 26 Jun 2005 00:33:44 GMT

She was a good looking mature woman in the 80's at least.The picture of her on the website is the same she has been using at least since 1988 when 'How to wheel a fortune' was published. I got a book from 1990(norwegian version) with the same picture on the back.

Reply #24

RJOh — Sun, 26 Jun 2005 00:25:15 GMT

I'm 63 and would definitely date a woman 40-60 that looked good too.

Reply #23

Pick-4_Master — Sun, 26 Jun 2005 00:18:08 GMT

The reason for that is not everyone that HITS a jackpot with her software informs her of it from what she says.So she can only verify the winners that contact her too let her know any other winners most likely keep it too themselves.(Mature women that keep themselves up are very attractive I'm 38 and would definitely date a woman 40-60 that looked good

Reply #22

Maverick — Sat, 25 Jun 2005 23:35:28 GMT

Did you notice her site is updated with newspaper clippings of her winners? That's nice to see.I have her products too. This is not a bash but a realistic point. Out of her 74 jackpot winners, I assume there are much much more... probably in the millions who use her products... so I started thinking, that 74 doesn't look so hot if you look at the amount of people who use it internationally .Anyway, I will from time to time still use her charts... sometimes mixing it with my own personal #'s.PS.... [ More ]

Reply #21

ify911 — Sat, 25 Jun 2005 18:10:08 GMT

GH system is good. i personally use it . have not won anything yet . but based on her trend and pattern . it does take a while to understand and yes .narrowing your number selection wheeling is key .

Reply #20

RJOh — Wed, 22 Jun 2005 02:12:16 GMT

I think they are probably real, but then I also believe that those fortune cookie wins were real, the QP's winners are real and that PowerBall winner in Idaho that played the same numbers for the four years was real too, but I wouldn't use QP's or fortune cookies to pick my numbers or play the same numbers for four years either. RJOh

Reply #19

Maverick — Wed, 22 Jun 2005 02:04:52 GMT

I use to drink that... wait that was Crazy Horse

Reply #18

Maverick — Wed, 22 Jun 2005 02:04:00 GMT

Yes, but it isn't always right, which creates this face lol

Reply #17

Maverick — Wed, 22 Jun 2005 02:01:49 GMT

Is luckyhorse really from Canada

Reply #16

Maverick — Wed, 22 Jun 2005 02:00:19 GMT

Exactly.

Reply #15

Maverick — Wed, 22 Jun 2005 01:58:19 GMT

Rjoh, do you believe her winners are real or fake

Reply #14

emilyg — Tue, 21 Jun 2005 16:34:18 GMT

luckyhorse - are you the same luckyhorse from maybell's

Reply #13

vick — Tue, 21 Jun 2005 05:49:10 GMT

doesn't chart 5 show the repeat hits ratios

Reply #12

four4me — Tue, 21 Jun 2005 04:45:52 GMT

I like the tips methods she describes for pick 5 daily games. using that information around the 13 thru 18 of the month is the best time. Usually only about 1/2 the 5/39 numbers have been drawn and they have kinda set up whats running hot. If you are tracking numbers you should be able to make some fairly good selections from the rest of the group for a decent wheel.

Reply #11

Pick-4_Master — Tue, 21 Jun 2005 04:36:33 GMT

I don't use past draws too analyse the numbers but use it too analyse number variables I have found that for me this approach is much better.Yes the software does things that are too time consuming too be done on paper basically without Lottery software I wouldn't be playing Lottery games at all.

Reply #10

luckyhorse — Tue, 21 Jun 2005 03:37:53 GMT

not really that strange! the new website has peaked my interest a little bit it looks like its all the old stuff it is too bad the software hasn't improved upon its smart picks another idea i had is lets say a number looks good as a double bottom hit its too bad the software couldnt research how often that particular number hit as a double bottom [obviously those who have never used the software or read the books might not know what i'am talikng about but those that do doesnt'that sound like a... [ More ]

Reply #9

LANTERN — Tue, 21 Jun 2005 02:37:14 GMT

I guess that maybe there is no more LottoSyncMan, maybe not untill Lottosync 1.8 gets released, if ever (I would not hold my breath waiting for it).

Reply #8

Todd — Tue, 21 Jun 2005 02:10:24 GMT

Second time that luckyhorse came into the forums to post one message about GH. Strange.https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/112172.htm

Reply #7

RJOh — Mon, 20 Jun 2005 21:51:19 GMT

Players who are capable of developing systems to select their numbers are equally capable of developing systems to analyze past draw histories using one of the programs which come with most computers and if they want to wheel their numbers, CoverMaster one the best wheel design program around is free. The only reasons to buy lottery software is that it does something you can't do or you're not willing to spend the time doing.RJOh

Reply #6

Pick-4_Master — Mon, 20 Jun 2005 20:44:07 GMT

I agree Lottery Software is bad for PICKING numbers but is Great for wheeling,filtering and analysis which is basically what it should be used for.The player should develop his own way of selecting numbers too wheel and then use Lottery software for everything else.A lot of Players put too much emphasis on the Program should do all the work when it's really a 50/50 deal you select the numbers and the software arranges and reduces the combo's based on your selected settings.I use Gail's progr... [ More ]

Reply #5

RJOh — Mon, 20 Jun 2005 20:35:56 GMT

Ever wonder why all those claims by software vendors about their software winning big in the past only worked for one person per lottery in spite of the fact that they have thousands of users? Each lottery drawing only has one set of winning numbers and if any software was really picking the best numbers to play for a particular drawing then those numbers would be the same for all its users. Some software may be helpful for analyzing past drawing histories but when it comes to picking numbers t... [ More ]

Reply #4

Pick-4_Master — Mon, 20 Jun 2005 20:03:33 GMT

Also from what I understand those testimonials are REAL those people did WIN using her software not all from Lottery though there are winners from Pick-5 as well.There are also Jackpot winners using other Lottery Programs not just Gails stuff Lottery Pro 2005 had a recent winner that posted here on this Forum from Ohio and also a guy using Lotto-Cheetah.But obviously not everyone will get the same results as those players did so that's why I never buy software based on what someone else was ab... [ More ]

Reply #3

Pick-4_Master — Mon, 20 Jun 2005 19:35:24 GMT

I have her software but didn't buy it because of the testimonials but I have talked with an individual during the late 90's that did win a jackpot with her software.I use it too help analyse numbers and filter settings I don't use her wheels not very impressed with them I currently use LS2004 which is a very good program for those that are experienced lottery software users.

Reply #2

RJOh — Mon, 20 Jun 2005 18:52:46 GMT

According to to her website, lots of people have won big using her system. I have to assume if you bought her software then you believed what you read there.RJOh

Reply #1

Badger — Sun, 19 Jun 2005 00:32:38 GMT

Don't feel bad. Every system hits sometimes, and when it comes to wheels, there's just no way to cover all the possibilities.

has anyone ever won big using a GH system

luckyhorse — Sat, 18 Jun 2005 22:13:11 GMT

personally back in 1989 i won a 5/6 prize with her 24 number wheel the crazy thing about it is the 6th winning number was in the combo above the numbers were 1-6-15-26-28-39 and my numbers were 1-6-15-26-28-40 that damn 39 was in the combo above and was the last number it still haunts me to this day! lol