Aye' reply

Reply #5

LottoVantage — Thu, 07 Jul 2005 10:43:18 GMT

Has this method shown a profit or greater than chance success in back-testing or actual play for you?aye', during the Ohio Buckeye-5 run, I personally hit 4 out of 5 numbers twice for a total of $500.00, and have had countless 2 and 3 number matches paying $1.00 and $10.00 respectively. Surprisingly, I am not a serious GAMBLER, and only play occasionally for personal recreation and fun.My greatest joy is in creation and discovery. Several years ago I was educated in Stastical Process Control p... [ More ]

Reply #4

ayenowitall — Thu, 07 Jul 2005 07:45:49 GMT

LottoVantage,I don't understand all the specifics of the way your system works, but I do think I have a general idea of what you're doing. Thanks for taking the time to offer an explanation. I realize that you can't give away everything at this preliminary stage.Has this method shown a profit or greater than chance success in back-testing or actual play for you? I hope you're cashing lots of tickets. Perhaps the rest of us will have a chance to share in your success when you're able to make more... [ More ]

Reply #3

LottoVantage — Wed, 06 Jul 2005 04:54:14 GMT

What exactly are these upper and lower tier groups? At first I thought they were 1-28 for the lower tier and 29-56 for the upper tier. Is that the way they started out with the new matrices, and are they changing with each draw?Yes, this is correct. For MEGA MILLIONS, the UPPER and LOWER tiers are composed of 28 numbers each. The tier structures are ever changing as numbers are drawn.1. As numbers mature in value, (number of times drawn within a given time frame), they eventually elevate from... [ More ]

Reply #2

ayenowitall — Wed, 06 Jul 2005 01:00:36 GMT

Okay, let's start with a rather fundamental aspect of your method. What exactly are these upper and lower tier groups? At first I thought they were 1-28 for the lower tier and 29-56 for the upper tier. Is that the way they started out with the new matrices, and are they changing with each draw? If so, how did the drawing of 2,14, 20, and 25 in the lower tier group and their consequent elevation to the upper tier group specifically cause the 29,30,and 31 to regress into the lower tier group? Are... [ More ]

Reply #1

ayenowitall — Tue, 05 Jul 2005 09:27:18 GMT

LottoVantage,Thank you for your detailed response. I've read through it a couple of times, but it's quite a bit to digest. I'm going to have to devote a little more time to it before I can offer any further meaningful feedback. I hope that others here at Lottery Post will take the time to give serious consideration to your presentation.Much thanks,aye

Aye' reply

LottoVantage — Mon, 04 Jul 2005 22:35:09 GMT

Aye',Thanks for your time, effort, and genuine interest! Will at least try and answer some of your questions.Here goe's:Why are the numbers 29,30 and 31 in your lower tier group?Number one reason is because due to the matrice change, I have started with a new data base, (Lottery Pool).Number two reason is because 02, 14, 20, 25 were drawn within the LOWER TIER, and was elevated to the UPPER TIER. This forced 29, 30, and 31 to regress into the LOWER TIER group.Where are all the due numbers and co... [ More ]