Does anyone use these systems?

Reply #15

LANTERN — Wed, 27 Jul 2005 02:43:17 GMT

If you don't know how to win, then you can't make a lottery program that will let you win.And if you do know, you might not want to make the program for others just for yourself.As the song says Does anybody really knows ?It is for them to know and for us to find out.

Reply #14

garyo1954 — Wed, 27 Jul 2005 01:11:14 GMT

I think we are coming to the conclusion here that the coding is simple. And it is really.The underlying problem is trying to define and make sense of an *unpredictable past to generate a predictable future.* I say unpredictable because at one time the past was the future that we could't predict at that time.You programming buddy is a smart guy. He knows the routines are easy but there are no possible ways to predict the outcome until you have reliable predictable past data that works in a set ma... [ More ]

Reply #13

BobP — Tue, 26 Jul 2005 03:01:42 GMT

First of all it was a short list of software that doesn't pick winning numbers. Sure you want to be on that list? And second your software while excellent lottery tools don't pick winning numbers either, though in your case LotteryPost software wasn't designed to pick winning numbers, or (cough) best number, or optimal numbers, or whatever term software sellers substitute to give the impression the numbers will win. A nice addition to the Quick Pick Generator would be a routine to include all... [ More ]

Reply #12

pacattack05 — Mon, 25 Jul 2005 05:47:38 GMT

I personally like LP's availability of a plethora of wheels , in a single instant for my use.

Reply #11

Todd — Mon, 25 Jul 2005 04:41:51 GMT

It would be nice to see Lottery Post software on that list, like Deflate 3 4, Inspector 3 4, Lottery Wheels, and Quick Picks Generator, which I think honestly provide more functionality and flexibility than many (might I say most?) of those programs.

Reply #10

BobP — Mon, 25 Jul 2005 04:12:45 GMT

It's a chicken and egg thing. You have to know how to win the lottery to program software to do just that and if you already know how to win, maybe you don't need the software or can't trust the programmer . . . think what you would tell a programmer to put in so the program would pick winning numbers . . . what yes/no questions would the software have to run down the logic tree with to produce winning numbers? I like working with Gail Howard, Lottohat, Lotwin and Lottery Director, but none of... [ More ]

Reply #9

Pick-4_Master — Fri, 22 Jul 2005 00:14:17 GMT

There's plenty of GOOD programs out there you just have too find the one that will work for you and learn how too use it effectively,efficiently and skillfully.Lotto-Architect is a program that has more than enough features too help a player win a jackpot.All you have too do is learn how too use the software in and out the same way you would when using commercial software like Windows and other Microsoft Applications.

Reply #8

pacattack05 — Mon, 18 Jul 2005 01:17:34 GMT

Yes, but Joe was gonna give me a good discount...See

Reply #7

RJOh — Sun, 17 Jul 2005 23:11:48 GMT

pacattack,If your buddy won't get off his behind and write the program that you want and you have a description of what you want, there are plenty of programmers that will work for you if you're willing to pay their price. Many of them advertise their services on the internet. Good luck to you.RJOh

Reply #6

rowdy117 — Sun, 17 Jul 2005 22:34:09 GMT

I agree with Pinback and Badger. Lotto Pro is great for everything except picking numbers. I also like how the databases are handled in Lotto Pro. Willl3 if you have questions about the Saliu system, I would be happy to try and help.

Reply #5

Badger — Sun, 17 Jul 2005 20:18:41 GMT

Like Pinback said (and others) Lotto Pro is good for keeping drawings as a database, but it is bad greatly at picking numbers for you. But if you can pick your own, it's wheels are pretty good.There seems to be no software out there that is any good at picking numbers for you. At the same time, every software gets lucky sometimes, just like every player does. So when you're looking at software, I'd pay more attention to what it offers in the way of sorting and giving you different data that yo... [ More ]

Reply #4

Pinback — Sun, 17 Jul 2005 03:37:04 GMT

Lotto Pro 2005 has lots of useful pre-defined wheels, and it's excellent at printing directly onto the betting slips (very easy to adjust the alignment settings to get it exactly right, and easy to change when you get a group of slips that were printed/cut just slightly differently). But unfortunately, it's stinky poo at selecting the numbers for you. So find another way to select the numbers, but consider Lotto Pro 2005 for your wheeling and printing needs.

Reply #3

LANTERN — Sun, 17 Jul 2005 03:12:48 GMT

You might be trying to make things too complicated, regular people without computers can and do get the number often enough at a profit, I know of 3 of them, no computer, no internet, no programs, just a few tricks of their own, How they do it ? I don't know, but they do it, it seems to be their own kind of common sense to them, whatever it might be, they won't tell me. They don't know programming and have little school. Of course there are very few people like them.

Reply #2

pacattack05 — Sat, 16 Jul 2005 22:43:12 GMT

I just wish that someone would come up with a piece of software that intergrates everysystem that was put out there and just spit out a number or numbers. The problem isthat having such a system would probably make the lottery authorities reduce the oddsof winning that much more.I asked a friend of mine who is a programmer, which I would pay for, to give me a setof potential of say, 10 numbers to play based on a database containing a billion numbersto evaluate. He said he could do that without a... [ More ]

Reply #1

LottoVantage — Sat, 16 Jul 2005 22:17:49 GMT

Have Lotto Pro 2005, and have used this system ever since it was sold on a BBS board. No system will automatically give you the magic numbers, but it's got the best statistics, and easiest to use wheeling systems around. I have added a lot of my own wheels, and a number of Gail Howards wheels from her book that I purchased, and it works great every time. Also to consider is free updates for as long as you own the system.I have tried many others, and Lotto Pro 2005 is the only program I have kept... [ More ]

Does anyone use these systems?

willl3 — Sat, 16 Jul 2005 21:17:00 GMT

lotto pro 2005lotto logiclotto apraiser 1.0lucky lottoVisual Recurrence Analysis Or a decent system that is good..used salui systen but it was weird and not user friendlyWill3