Lottosync

Reply #16

psykomo — Sat, 06 Aug 2005 08:00:19 GMT

THANKs BOPPPPPPPPP on *>>>>>>>>>>6th.........YOU have a POINT!!!!BUT,.......THANKs TO rowdy 117,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,I like excitement!!!!!!BIGGER...................................ODDS, Bigger.............CHALLENGEEEEEEEE?I Like this Lottosync^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^GUY, but I spend Mwhen.......................have extra money....................been to his great>>country and wish him WELLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLL,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,I like the PICK RICK<<66666666666 or 649.......... [ More ]

Reply #15

BobP — Sat, 06 Aug 2005 06:18:40 GMT

In Florida we have 5/36 and 6/53 and 1.8 was supposed to include Pick-5, but even so all you had to do was tell Lottosync it was a 6/37 game and put 37 in the sixth position to make the software work for Pick-5, but never did better then some 3# wins. There was clearly something more to Lottosync over the run of the mill lotto software, trouble is one good idea isn't enough, it takes multiple good ideas working in sync. BobP

Reply #14

dragon — Sat, 06 Aug 2005 06:01:33 GMT

The lotteries I worked on back then were 6/49 with bonus numbers (California) and some other 6/XX lotteries. The methodologies really haven't changed, and lotteries are not any different in concept. They have become more difficult to calculate, since the mega and bonus numbers keep changing, but really, there isn't anything significantly different going on today than all the way back in the 60ies.When writing code, there is a tendency to make it smarter and using heuristics. So you basically f... [ More ]

Reply #13

rowdy117 — Fri, 05 Aug 2005 09:22:39 GMT

BobP,Did you say Pick-5? The website says that it is only for Pick-6.

Reply #12

paul762 — Fri, 05 Aug 2005 09:16:13 GMT

I have run so many tests with lottosync that my new 3.4ghz pc has today pointed out it doesnt want to do anymore, cant seem to get hold of an engineer today though for some reason. im sure someone somewhere doesnt want me to win.

Reply #11

BobP — Fri, 05 Aug 2005 05:37:46 GMT

Well one of the first questions might be whether today's lottery software would have been more effective against the lotteries of twenty years ago? Are we dealing with more perfect random these days?It seems to me, when we predict 24 numbers out of 49 we usually get 3 correct or one off more or less the same distribution of odd/even or low/high, but when I use lottery software I often do worse like it's coded backwards or something so it doesn't even play at house odds. One would think it possi... [ More ]

Reply #10

dragon — Fri, 05 Aug 2005 03:46:52 GMT

Yes.I worked on lottery programs between 1987 and 1992 and then stopped after deciding it was a waste of time.Programs I wrote and bought (back then) always did not better than average random play.I have received much better results with remote viewing experiments which I continue to work with. But you have to go to the Mystical section for information about that.

Reply #9

psykomo — Sun, 31 Jul 2005 06:35:55 GMT

FIRST of ALL............I donot own HIS softwae......................................!!!!!!!!!!!but,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,believe this person to be.......................................1000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000%TRUE...................................TRUEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!!!!!!!!READ...................................(between his lines and his COUNTRY) but, for!!!!! NOW>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>(LEEVE Him and Hi... [ More ]

Reply #8

Pick-4_Master — Thu, 28 Jul 2005 06:15:47 GMT

Hey DRAGON do you have a Lottery program that you developed

Reply #7

reddog — Thu, 28 Jul 2005 00:06:08 GMT

No comment. Some things are better left unsaid.

Reply #6

LANTERN — Wed, 27 Jul 2005 19:56:18 GMT

If we don't get it, we will always wonder why.I see good potential in LottoSync, but Marco might be set in a mold, that he can't and or don't want to break, LottoSync needs to evolve.For whatever reason(s) it looks as if Marco will keep it to himself.I would likke to say Finito , but this will always keep on coming up, or at least for a very long time to come yet.Good luck to all.

Reply #5

vick — Wed, 27 Jul 2005 19:00:57 GMT

i emailed guru about 1 week ago but no response regarding the current status of 1.8. i still use it for keno and it hit for about $325 1 week ago and nearly for $2000 !, but i would greatly like to get my hands on that 1.8.i still hold out hope because the website is still alive. Goodluck Paul and others

Reply #4

paul762 — Wed, 27 Jul 2005 16:49:24 GMT

LOTTOSYNC - preds : Belgium 6/42 results Hits 8-Oct 01 03 08 15 16 17 21 25 34 39 - 03 16 20 21 31 36+22 3/10 11-Oct 04 09 12 15 23 25 26 29 34 39 - 06 19 26 27 34 37+11 2/1015-Oct no play, but look at preds above - 08 12 25 26 29 39+18 no play18-Oct 01 02 03 07 20 21 23 24 31 36 - 03 08 09 13 24 37+36 2/10 +B22-Oct no play 03 05 08 22 32 35+29 no play... [ More ]

Reply #3

dragon — Wed, 27 Jul 2005 05:56:38 GMT

The presence of a web site has nothing to do with an active software development project.I watched this forum last May, June and July when Guru was actually WORKING on this project, getting some results. But when August came around, he obviously got sidetracked with his job, the LS project didn't go anywhere because his tests probably showed that he didn't get any results better than random drawings.Rather than suffering the embarrassment of issuing a release that was buggy and on top of it did... [ More ]

Reply #2

BobP — Mon, 25 Jul 2005 04:40:26 GMT

The Lottosync web site remains, therefore an upgrade remains possible as well. BobP

Reply #1

LANTERN — Sun, 24 Jul 2005 04:56:28 GMT

THERE WILL BE AN UPGRADE YOU JUST WAIT, IT MIGHT TAKE 30 YEARS MAYBE, BUT THERE WILL BE, AT LEAST IN OUR DREAMS ANYWAY.10 YEARS OR 50 FROM NOW, PEOPLE WILL STILL BE ASKING FOR AN UPGRADE, GIVE IT A REST, DIDN'T HEAR ? GIVE IT A REST!If we get it, then fine, if not, Well, those are the breaks!It will be ready when it is ready and not a second before, we will get it even if it takes another 10 years, if not well, we won't then.If crying makes us all feel better then maybe we should cry, but let us... [ More ]

Lottosync

popeye — Sun, 24 Jul 2005 04:33:01 GMT

I think the grace period for LS 1.8 is well past the mark.How many of you that bought the software still believe there will be any further versions