SHTH sets a new Lotterypost record!?!

Reply #5

SHTh — Sat, 06 Aug 2005 14:47:14 GMT

Submission of old records permitted as long as they meet the criteria.

Reply #4

SHTh — Sat, 06 Aug 2005 14:32:22 GMT

For a more serious answer, the sabbatical wasn t meant to last as long as it has. It just I wasn t expecting to get bogged down in so much brainstorming and analytical research.Plus once you start physically doing the maths for yourself, you really start to appreciate the futility/enormity of winning any major prize tier. Don't get me wrong there has been times when I been craving to purchase a ticket or two, I still am.When I get started I'm going have one heck of a bankroll. If filtering is so... [ More ]

Reply #3

JAP69 — Sat, 06 Aug 2005 13:38:17 GMT

From the looks of the last statement the last ticket purchased hit the pot at the end of the rainbow.

Reply #2

SHTh — Sat, 06 Aug 2005 13:22:08 GMT

Why not? Anyway I have 14 million reasons.

Reply #1

Todd — Sat, 06 Aug 2005 12:55:03 GMT

I don't doubt your record, but why would you want to hold it

SHTH sets a new Lotterypost record!?!

SHTh — Sat, 06 Aug 2005 12:52:16 GMT

I haven't purchased a single lottery ticket in 43 draws (21½ weeks)!!!Is this a Lotterypost record? If you wish to dispute my Title, the criteria for eligibility: 1) Ticket buying sabbatical must have been since you started playing the lotto semi-seriously 2) Sorry it doesn t count if you were incarcerated, posted abroad on military duty, banned by the missus etc etc 3) it doesn t count if your work syndicate or anyone else bought tickets on your behalf. SHTH.