<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
	<channel>
		<title>2nd tier MM prize as a progressive</title>
		<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/117788</link>
		<atom:link href="https://www.lotterypost.com/rss/topic/117788" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<description>Lottery Post Forum Topic: 2nd tier MM prize as a progressive</description>
		<dc:language>en-us</dc:language>
		<generator>Lottery Post RSS Generator</generator>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #11</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/117788/428768</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/117788/428768</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 10 Aug 2005 21:40:53 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Todd</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>It can&#x27;t be done in Powerball, because small states would have terrible 2nd tier prizes.  It&#x27;s already being done in all states that offer pari-mutuel prize payouts.  In fact, California has pari-mutuel prizes on all games, including SLP.  The problem with your theory (other than what I&#x27;ve mentioned already) is that the odds of hitting a 2nd prize in all other games is low enough that there would never be this kind of payout for 2nd place.This is a concept that really only works with Mega Millio... &#x5b;&#xa0;<a href="https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/117788/428768">More</a>&#xa0;&#x5d;</p>]]></description>
			<category>Todd</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #10</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/117788/428752</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/117788/428752</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 10 Aug 2005 21:19:20 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>CASH Only</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>$1,400,675 to be exact; still over $1 million after 25% federal tax withholding.</p>]]></description>
			<category>CASH Only</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #9</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/117788/428750</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/117788/428750</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 10 Aug 2005 21:16:58 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>CASH Only</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>The second-prize progressive should be tried in more games. Maybe MUSL could offer it in Powerball, either state-by-state or a shared pool. BTW this is the ONE good thing about NY Lotto.</p>]]></description>
			<category>CASH Only</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #8</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/117788/428625</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/117788/428625</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 10 Aug 2005 17:03:21 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Just6ntlc</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>I agree what you said Todd. The mini progressive of CA Matching 5 numbers in MM is a twist that MM didn&#x27;t expect. It doesn&#x27;t endanger F5 in CA right now, but I wished that F5 and Pick 3 go to a ball security machine.</p>]]></description>
			<category>Just6ntlc</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #7</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/117788/428433</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/117788/428433</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 10 Aug 2005 06:37:15 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Todd</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Quote: Originally posted by DoctorEw220 on August 10, 2005 I think CA has a brilliant idea with rolling over the match 5 prize each time there isn&#x27;t a winner, but wouldn&#x27;t that kill their Fantasy 5 game?<br /><br />No, F5 has much better odds, being a 5/39 game, whereas Mega Millions, when looked upon as as Pick 5-style game, is 5/56. I think the progressive style of play for a 5+0 match is an interesting side-effect, but in no way endangers F5.<br /><br />I think the fact that F5 is drawn by a computer in the... &#x5b;&#xa0;<a href="https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/117788/428433">More</a>&#xa0;&#x5d;</p>]]></description>
			<category>Todd</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #6</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/117788/428418</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/117788/428418</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 10 Aug 2005 04:04:45 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>DoctorEw220</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>I think CA has a brilliant idea with rolling over the match 5 prize each time there isn&#x27;t a winner, but wouldn&#x27;t that kill their Fantasy 5 game</p>]]></description>
			<category>DoctorEw220</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #5</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/117788/427293</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/117788/427293</guid>
			<pubDate>Sun, 07 Aug 2005 22:54:50 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Just6ntlc</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>I hope that there&#x27;s a Megaplier from Texas to go for all the MM states [except for CA that is pari-mutuel] so that a 5/5 player can win as much as $1 million if that&#x27;s possible. CA should stick to pari-mutuel with 5/5 is at a mini progressive at 1.5 million this draw [if 1 ticket hits].</p>]]></description>
			<category>Just6ntlc</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #4</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/117788/427291</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/117788/427291</guid>
			<pubDate>Sun, 07 Aug 2005 22:51:49 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>ryanm</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>That&#x27;s the reason why those smaller states can afford a $250,000 prize - they don&#x27;t expect anyone to match 5+0 every single drawing; therefore, they can just hold the money set aside for those prizes for drawings in which they do need the money to pay the set prize winners.</p>]]></description>
			<category>ryanm</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #3</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/117788/427288</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/117788/427288</guid>
			<pubDate>Sun, 07 Aug 2005 22:26:45 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Bradly_60</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Well the 2nd tier prize would only be progressive while everything else says the same.  How those states can afford a $250,000 prize is beyond me anyway.  But those  small  states don&#x27;t have that many 2nd tier prize winners anyway.  Especially now after the new matrix.  So their jackpots would roll on an on too.  I mean I guess it does suck if two people win it when it is at $400,000.  Let just get the megaplier.  That&#x27;s the solution.  hahaBrad</p>]]></description>
			<category>Bradly_60</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #2</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/117788/427278</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/117788/427278</guid>
			<pubDate>Sun, 07 Aug 2005 21:34:12 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Chewie</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Good point. The whole purpose of the big games are to provide dollars the states cannot provide on their own.  Lets see, $50K chance for a dollar, or $41M chance for a dollar? Which way to go</p>]]></description>
			<category>Chewie</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #1</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/117788/427270</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/117788/427270</guid>
			<pubDate>Sun, 07 Aug 2005 21:06:03 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Todd</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>No, I think each state should come up with their own separate progressive game, if that&#x27;s their intention.I like the fixed prize amounts, especially for smaller states that would otherwise never offer such big prizes for second place.</p>]]></description>
			<category>Todd</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>2nd tier MM prize as a progressive</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/117788</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/117788</guid>
			<pubDate>Sun, 07 Aug 2005 20:34:20 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Bradly_60</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>What do you guys think?  I think to make sure the players get their 50% of ticket sales in each drawing they should have the 2nd tier a progressive for each state alone.  I mean the odds are 1 in 4 million almost which is quite larger then a lot of other lottery games.  It would be fun it would be like another jackpot to play for. Brad</p>]]></description>
			<category>Bradly_60</category>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

