<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
	<channel>
		<title>Dawn Nettles and the TX Lottery</title>
		<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/117987</link>
		<atom:link href="https://www.lotterypost.com/rss/topic/117987" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<description>Lottery Post Forum Topic: Dawn Nettles and the TX Lottery</description>
		<dc:language>en-us</dc:language>
		<generator>Lottery Post RSS Generator</generator>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #8</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/117987/429542</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/117987/429542</guid>
			<pubDate>Fri, 12 Aug 2005 16:49:53 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>LANTERN</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>ToddShe might be receptive, but the state(s) and those above her would not, a director has only so much authority.As to you, your site and any rumors about; Well, there will probably always be rumors such as those, so long as things don&#x27;t get too much out of hand, they should be mostly harmless, it would nolt be your fault if lottery people come here to look around every single day or if they have a feed of all posts and or just prediction posts going straight to them for them to see every day o... &#x5b;&#xa0;<a href="https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/117987/429542">More</a>&#xa0;&#x5d;</p>]]></description>
			<category>LANTERN</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #7</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/117987/429517</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/117987/429517</guid>
			<pubDate>Fri, 12 Aug 2005 15:48:29 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Todd</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Well, if Ms. Nettles gets appointed to the position, maybe you can pitch her the idea.  Perhaps she would be receptive, although you probably shouldn&#x27;t mention Lottery Post to her, because she e-mailed me that she is no friend of this site.She basically implied that because I don&#x27;t publish my personal biography on this site, that she finds me  suspicious , and apparently there is a rumor floating around that I am associated with one or more of the state lotteries.I tried to e-mail her that no, I... &#x5b;&#xa0;<a href="https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/117987/429517">More</a>&#xa0;&#x5d;</p>]]></description>
			<category>Todd</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #6</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/117987/429509</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/117987/429509</guid>
			<pubDate>Fri, 12 Aug 2005 15:40:28 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>LANTERN</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>You know, I am very very serious about this.States should not do or handle their own draws, if they do they are bound to be partial only to themselves.Whoever does handle the draws should not have anything to do with those that will use those draws and winning numbers.There should be a combined fund to which all the state lotteries would contribute and this money given to those who would provide the numbers to them, or maybe even better, have the federal government pay to those that handle the d... &#x5b;&#xa0;<a href="https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/117987/429509">More</a>&#xa0;&#x5d;</p>]]></description>
			<category>LANTERN</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #5</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/117987/429356</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/117987/429356</guid>
			<pubDate>Fri, 12 Aug 2005 04:56:06 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Bradly_60</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>You know what that is a great idea.  I will start a security company that handles lottery drawings.  My company will have no idea of each lotteries sales so therefore noway for the company to  fix  the drawings.  And just to please everyone on here I will make sure all drawings are conducted via balls and drums.  Charge the lotteries a very small fee so everyone wins.  Players and lotteries would not be able to complain at all then.  That is a great idea.Brad</p>]]></description>
			<category>Bradly_60</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #4</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/117987/429347</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/117987/429347</guid>
			<pubDate>Fri, 12 Aug 2005 03:59:28 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>LANTERN</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>She can be and do no worse than any of the past lottery directors and Who knows ? Might be maybe much better (?).I just want them to quit scre---g with the draws-numbers, to me, everything points to fowl play or doctored draws or whatever you want to call that monkey business, I have seen plenty of past draws and I have also seen computer generated random pick 3 numbers and I have seen pick 3 numbers from very many states, things don&#x27;t look right, they just don&#x27;t add up to anything good. There s... &#x5b;&#xa0;<a href="https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/117987/429347">More</a>&#xa0;&#x5d;</p>]]></description>
			<category>LANTERN</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #3</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/117987/429188</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/117987/429188</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 11 Aug 2005 22:01:38 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Todd</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>I could have fun with that...</p>]]></description>
			<category>Todd</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #2</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/117987/429184</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/117987/429184</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 11 Aug 2005 21:58:01 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>LOTTOMIKE</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>hopefully she&#x27;ll get it to a respectable level again because right now the texas lottery is in shambles....</p>]]></description>
			<category>LOTTOMIKE</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #1</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/117987/429160</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/117987/429160</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 11 Aug 2005 19:24:09 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Ms5PennieGen</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Dawn Nettles has been watching our back in Texas for a while now when no one else would. I think she would be the best person for the Job.  I think she would be a fair person and we wouldn&#x27;t have to worry about being cheated out of our money.Maybe she could change the lottery back. I welcome her appointment and hope she gets it!! Best wishes for her.</p>]]></description>
			<category>Ms5PennieGen</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Dawn Nettles and the TX Lottery</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/117987</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/117987</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 11 Aug 2005 18:19:19 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Bradly_60</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Well it looks like we know why she excused herself from the selection committee to find a new TX Lottery Director....SHE MIGHT BE IT HERSELF!!!Check out her website Brad</p>]]></description>
			<category>Bradly_60</category>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

