<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
	<channel>
		<title>Jackpot winners</title>
		<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/118267</link>
		<atom:link href="https://www.lotterypost.com/rss/topic/118267" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<description>Lottery Post Forum Topic: Jackpot winners</description>
		<dc:language>en-us</dc:language>
		<generator>Lottery Post RSS Generator</generator>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #7</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/118267/434376</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/118267/434376</guid>
			<pubDate>Mon, 22 Aug 2005 18:09:24 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Just6ntlc</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>In CA, an unclaimed MM and/or SLP jackpot winning ticket after 6 months will be transferred to educaion. Regardless, if I win a jackpot for MM and/or CA SLP, Uncle Sam will take some money away. If more than 2 winners won a jackpot and one is unclaimed like the one on September 2003, the cash value of $28.5 million in CA SLP went directly to education.</p>]]></description>
			<category>Just6ntlc</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #6</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/118267/432660</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/118267/432660</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 18 Aug 2005 21:25:55 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>RJOh</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>If there&#x27;s only one winner and he doesn&#x27;t claim the money the state keeps the money, why would anyone expect a different rule for more than one winner?  I&#x27;m sure there are players who would think the co-jackpot winners had enough and the extra money should be shared with all the other players.</p>]]></description>
			<category>RJOh</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #5</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/118267/432611</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/118267/432611</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 18 Aug 2005 19:45:50 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>ryanm</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Yep, they figure,  Oh, the person who won half the jackpot is already rich enough because of it.  lol</p>]]></description>
			<category>ryanm</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #4</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/118267/432472</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/118267/432472</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 18 Aug 2005 14:52:22 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Chewie</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>E-X-A-C-T-L-YFrom what I can tell, when a representative takes the oath, it says  I solemnly promise not to take the concerns or welfare of any resident into any decision I make.</p>]]></description>
			<category>Chewie</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #3</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/118267/431867</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/118267/431867</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 17 Aug 2005 04:51:31 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>dvdiva</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Unclaimed prizes even if it&#x27;s half of a jackpot should roll into the next jackpot once the money is past the claim date (with one or two extra months just in case).</p>]]></description>
			<category>dvdiva</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #2</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/118267/431827</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/118267/431827</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 17 Aug 2005 02:47:29 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Litebets27</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>I don&#x27;t think any State would give up one red penny that might float back to the State&#x27;s coffer. I don&#x27;t know of any State that has a governing body that is that sensative to  the people .litebets</p>]]></description>
			<category>Litebets27</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #1</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/118267/431823</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/118267/431823</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 17 Aug 2005 02:38:46 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>ryanm</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>That is the way it should be - unfortunately, I don&#x27;t know how they&#x27;d be able to enforce it.</p>]]></description>
			<category>ryanm</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Jackpot winners</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/118267</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/118267</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 17 Aug 2005 02:25:10 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Bradly_60</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>I don&#x27;t think this ever happened but I am not sure.  Say there was more than one winning tickets ex 2.  One person claims the prize and the other person doesn&#x27;t.  In my opinion the person that claimed it should get all of the prize instead of the other half going back to the lottery(ies).  I mean if two tickets won the prize but one went unclaimed it should be just like one winning ticket was sold.  Any other thoughts on this?Brad</p>]]></description>
			<category>Bradly_60</category>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

