<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
	<channel>
		<title>This Game Might Just Be Perfect</title>
		<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/118707</link>
		<atom:link href="https://www.lotterypost.com/rss/topic/118707" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<description>Lottery Post Forum Topic: This Game Might Just Be Perfect</description>
		<dc:language>en-us</dc:language>
		<generator>Lottery Post RSS Generator</generator>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #10</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/118707/449411</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/118707/449411</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 21 Sep 2005 19:29:27 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>JimmySand9</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>O.K. You thought that was nice, how about this.Whenever the jackpot hits $20 million annuity value, and theres no winner, the jackpot winfalls. The jackpot would be divided evenly among the 4 lower prize tiers. Regular Prize Avg. Winfall Prize Match 7 Jackpot N/A Match 6 $1,500 $156,827 Match 5 $50 $2,550 Match 4 $5 $115 Match 3 $1 $11 These would&#x27;nt come up very often, but to me, it can be just as exciting as a $300M jackpot. I mean, $11 being the lowest prize in a game with 1 in 10 overall odd... &#x5b;&#xa0;<a href="https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/118707/449411">More</a>&#xa0;&#x5d;</p>]]></description>
			<category>JimmySand9</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #9</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/118707/448056</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/118707/448056</guid>
			<pubDate>Mon, 19 Sep 2005 02:20:40 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>JimmySand9</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>What is that, like a 2000% payout?Hey, here&#x27;s what I use to determine my payouts. It calculates both odds and average payouts.</p>]]></description>
			<category>JimmySand9</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #8</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/118707/437417</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/118707/437417</guid>
			<pubDate>Sun, 28 Aug 2005 21:34:58 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Just6ntlc</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>I agree with this payout, but it seems expensive for a $2 game JimmySand.  Here&#x27;s my suggestion:Pick 5 out of 25, plus a bonus ball out of remaining 20 to win a jackpot.Cost: 2 plays for a $1Payout [on average] 5+bonus: $200000 [minimum and grows with rollover]5: $25004+bonus: $3004: $303+bonus: $203: $52+bonus: $31+bonus: $2bonus only: $1</p>]]></description>
			<category>Just6ntlc</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #7</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/118707/436537</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/118707/436537</guid>
			<pubDate>Sat, 27 Aug 2005 01:29:12 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>JimmySand9</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>That is way too confusing.I just made that game to satisfy CO&#x27;s desire for an expensive game.</p>]]></description>
			<category>JimmySand9</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #6</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/118707/436308</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/118707/436308</guid>
			<pubDate>Fri, 26 Aug 2005 17:09:27 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Just6ntlc</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>$2 for one ticket for low odds is too much JimmySand9. Let&#x27;s try this plan:Pick 5 out of 49 and a Mega Number 1 out of 27. There is also a bonus WB for the remaining 44 numbers.Cost: 2 plays for a $1Here&#x27;s the average payout:Match All 5 and Mega: Jackpot [minimum: $3 million]All 5: $20,0004 out of 5 plus bonus and Mega: $5,0004 out of 5 and Mega: $1,5004 out of 5 plus bonus: $2004 out of 5: $1003 out of 5 plus bonus and Mega: $1003 out of 5 and Mega: $503 out of 5 plus bonus: $203 out of 5: $102... &#x5b;&#xa0;<a href="https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/118707/436308">More</a>&#xa0;&#x5d;</p>]]></description>
			<category>Just6ntlc</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #5</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/118707/436009</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/118707/436009</guid>
			<pubDate>Fri, 26 Aug 2005 00:38:45 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>JimmySand9</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>O.K. MA Megabucks Player Hater If you like paying double what others are willing to pay, here&#x27;s a game for you.Pick 5 out of 25Cost : $2   Match 5 - $25,000   Match 4 - $50   Match 3 - $5   Match 2 - $2Overall odds : 1 in 3.9You need to have really low overall odds for a game this expensive.As for the original topic, people in Canada have no problem picking 7 numbers in their Lotto Super 7. And Super 7 in PA did pretty well, it only got axed because Keystone Jackpot would provide bigger jackpots... &#x5b;&#xa0;<a href="https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/118707/436009">More</a>&#xa0;&#x5d;</p>]]></description>
			<category>JimmySand9</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #4</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/118707/435933</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/118707/435933</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 25 Aug 2005 21:31:34 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>JimmySand9</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>For just one line? That&#x27;s just a little too much unless the game has ginormous lower-tier prizes. I only play Ca$h Winfall on a WinFall alert, as do a lot of others.</p>]]></description>
			<category>JimmySand9</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #3</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/118707/435894</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/118707/435894</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 25 Aug 2005 20:34:05 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>CASH Only</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>AFAIC the current gold standard is MA Ca$h WinFall, with its 60% return, and free play for 2/6 (1:6 overall odds).</p>]]></description>
			<category>CASH Only</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #2</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/118707/435892</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/118707/435892</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 25 Aug 2005 20:25:39 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>DoctorEw220</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Jimmy: I think you may actually have hit perfection with this one.</p>]]></description>
			<category>DoctorEw220</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #1</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/118707/435891</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/118707/435891</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 25 Aug 2005 20:21:20 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>CASH Only</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>I don&#x27;t think people like picking seven numbers (except in keno). Maybe you should be thinking up $2 games instead of 2 plays/$1.</p>]]></description>
			<category>CASH Only</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>This Game Might Just Be Perfect</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/118707</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/118707</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 25 Aug 2005 20:17:42 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>JimmySand9</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>I&#x27;ve come up with a simple lotto game, which would provide great jackpots, and great overall odds. It&#x27;s exciting and fun. Check it out.Pick 7 out of 492 plays for a dollarMinimum Jackpot : $4,000,000 annuity; $2,000,000 cash  Prize Odds per $1 Match 7 Jackpot(33.067% of sales)1 : 42,950,292 Match 6 $1,500 1 : 146,089 Match 5 $50 1 : 2,375 Match 4 $5 1 : 107 Match 3 $1 1 : 11 Overall Odds : 1 in 10</p>]]></description>
			<category>JimmySand9</category>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

