https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/119014 Lottery Post Forum Topic: SUPERCOMPUTERS & Lotteries...... en-us Lottery Post RSS Generator https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/119014/439147 https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/119014/439147 Thu, 01 Sep 2005 06:51:20 GMT pacattack05 A few years ago IBM came out with a super- computer designed to study nuclear explosions. It does a trillion calculations a second. It costs a 110 million dollars.The problem isn't whether a super-computer can or cannot spit out the winning cash-3 number. The problem is that there is not enough history in any given state, to do it justice.Having only 15 or so years to look back, in my opinion is not sufficient.That is what I've been working on with a computer programmer at work. When completed,... [ More ]

]]> pacattack05 https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/119014/439082 https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/119014/439082 Thu, 01 Sep 2005 03:22:50 GMT Badger My opinion: Beating the world's #1 chess player does not require predicting random moves. It requires great speed from the computer, which allows it to compute many possible moves and eliminate those that would not be assistive in gaining a victory, within well-defined rules.Predicting (and actually hitting) winning lottery numbers requires predicting a great deal of randomness. I'm not at all certain that even a supercomputer can predict a random event. The same as with a human predicting, the... [ More ]

]]> Badger https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/119014 https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/119014 Wed, 31 Aug 2005 13:48:09 GMT pumpi76 i am just curious to know, if a supercomputer beat theworld number one chess player do you think that in thefuture we would have a supercomputer that predictslottery numbers or for that matter individual stocksin the stock market.......i would appreciate your response,sincerely,michael brown

]]> pumpi76