<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
	<channel>
		<title>MM at 172 million.</title>
		<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/119371</link>
		<atom:link href="https://www.lotterypost.com/rss/topic/119371" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<description>Lottery Post Forum Topic: MM at 172 million.</description>
		<dc:language>en-us</dc:language>
		<generator>Lottery Post RSS Generator</generator>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #8</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/119371/442957</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/119371/442957</guid>
			<pubDate>Fri, 09 Sep 2005 06:57:56 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>dvdiva</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>I&#x27;m playing the Quinto again on the next rollover. It&#x27;s only for around 2 million but would be really happy to win it. The difference is that while I could afford a house and a good retirement fund I couldn&#x27;t afford to quit work. If I win a Megamillions over $300 I can feely express what I think of work without any worry about financial repercussions. Life would be free of struggle and the daily grind. But having a house without a mortgage - that too would be nice.</p>]]></description>
			<category>dvdiva</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #7</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/119371/442746</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/119371/442746</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 08 Sep 2005 20:19:38 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>DoctorEw220</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>I&#x27;d be happy with $12 milion or $15 million, or even $1 million.  It&#x27;s more than I have right now.</p>]]></description>
			<category>DoctorEw220</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #6</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/119371/442693</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/119371/442693</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 08 Sep 2005 18:16:30 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>RJOh</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>I think everything that could be written about winning $100M had been written.  After a while it seem they were just pulling up one of their old stories from the archives, which they may still be doing, but the amount has changed.  Winning a $100M jackpot would still be new and exciting to me because I have never won even a $1M jackpot.RJOh</p>]]></description>
			<category>RJOh</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #5</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/119371/442656</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/119371/442656</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 08 Sep 2005 17:14:23 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>CASH Only</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>I&#x27;m playing $3. I will be increasing my bet if no winner, whether or not it&#x27;s $200 million.</p>]]></description>
			<category>CASH Only</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #4</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/119371/442084</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/119371/442084</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 07 Sep 2005 13:02:09 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>JAG331</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>People are just as greedy as ever....fx is right, 250m is the new 100m.  And fewer trips to the convenience store.</p>]]></description>
			<category>JAG331</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #3</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/119371/442014</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/119371/442014</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 07 Sep 2005 07:20:51 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>fxsterling</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>fox used to talk a 100 million jackpots now you dont see them covered till they get to 250 million</p>]]></description>
			<category>fxsterling</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #2</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/119371/442003</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/119371/442003</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 07 Sep 2005 06:09:29 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>dvdiva</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>I don&#x27;t think higher odds has much to do with it. Extremely high gas prices and the largest natural disaster to hit this century have a lot more to do with the decrease in sales in my opinion.</p>]]></description>
			<category>dvdiva</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #1</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/119371/441995</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/119371/441995</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 07 Sep 2005 05:44:30 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>weshar75</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>That is only a 3 million jump above the last rollover of 19 million.  I guess 22 million is better than nothing at all.  It sure is obvious that players are turned off by the higher odds.  If this keeps up it will take 6 rolls to get to the 300 million mark and that is if there is no winner.</p>]]></description>
			<category>weshar75</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>MM at 172 million.</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/119371</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/119371</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 07 Sep 2005 05:13:52 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>dvdiva</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Looks like sales are slowing due to the incredible disaster that hit. One more drawing to go before it breaks 200.</p>]]></description>
			<category>dvdiva</category>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

