Matrix v population

Reply #4

CASH Only — Mon, 12 Sep 2005 13:40:09 GMT

ryan:FL _will_ eventually go multi-state.As for games being too large, perhaps Lotto Texas is. They should go back to the 6/54 game, but not to the original 6/50.

Reply #3

ryanm — Mon, 12 Sep 2005 02:53:58 GMT

Florida won't go Powerball or Mega Millions with its new 60% payback rule.

Reply #2

psykomo — Mon, 12 Sep 2005 02:34:48 GMT

CASH.............................I would not be to upset about LS jackpots, matrix or population til you or .......someone on LP hits the Jackpo$$$$$$$$$. It seems to be making a lot of winners happy with 2, 3, 4, or whatever....millions they are winning .......NOW!Tell us some software, wheel or how easy this little game is to WINNNNNNNNNI won't waste any quick-pick money on it at this time are any of my time think'gbout it..............................but, good luckPSYKOMO

Reply #1

JimmySand9 — Mon, 12 Sep 2005 02:08:51 GMT

You complain about the 6/49 matrix even more than you complain about New York Lotto. Just be happy with what you have, because while they can make it better, they can also make it worse. You don't know what you have until it's gone. I'm sure that's how people in PA felt when Keystone Jackpot AND Wild Card Lotto was replaced with Super 6 (or Stupid 6 as I've heard it sometimes called).As for games too small for it's state, Florida Lotto immediately comes to mind. Sure it would work fine if Powerb... [ More ]

Matrix v population

CASH Only — Sun, 11 Sep 2005 22:30:21 GMT

What I mean is this: Can you think of a jackpot game (in-state or multi-state, pick-6 or 5+1 format), whose matrix is either too large or too small for its population base?The best example I can think of, for a game too small, is Lotto South. It's a 6/49 game that IMO should be perhaps a 6/53, given the total populations of Georgia, Kentucky, and Virginia. VA had a 6/49 that became LS, without changing the matrix.