<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
	<channel>
		<title>CT Lottery - Is Jimmy Fun Or What?</title>
		<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/120453</link>
		<atom:link href="https://www.lotterypost.com/rss/topic/120453" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<description>Lottery Post Forum Topic: CT Lottery - Is Jimmy Fun Or What?</description>
		<dc:language>en-us</dc:language>
		<generator>Lottery Post RSS Generator</generator>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #8</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/120453/452939</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/120453/452939</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2005 22:44:48 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>JimmySand9</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Hmm, that&#x27;s an equally good prospect, letting Rhode Island start offering Classic Lotto.From Bridgeport to Newport, it&#x27;s Southern New England&#x27;s Classic Game.</p>]]></description>
			<category>JimmySand9</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #7</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/120453/452879</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/120453/452879</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2005 20:47:04 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>CASH Only</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>jag:I would support a NE Lotto game, assuming Classic Lotto, MA Mega$.uck$, and Tri-State Megabucks would be retired. Hot Lotto (New Hampshire) would stay, although I don&#x27;t see much of a future for it unless Oklahoma joins.</p>]]></description>
			<category>CASH Only</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #6</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/120453/452875</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/120453/452875</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2005 20:40:27 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>JAG331</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Good idea, CO.New England Lotto.  It could catch on, mirror image of the Tri-State coalition.</p>]]></description>
			<category>JAG331</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #5</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/120453/452872</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/120453/452872</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2005 20:35:24 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>CASH Only</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Dropping two numbers in Classic Lotto would result in the same jackpot odds as two other New England games, one with a bonus ball; the other still annuity-only. Maybe CT should partner with Rhode Island and offer the 6/44 in the Ocean State.</p>]]></description>
			<category>CASH Only</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #4</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/120453/452868</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/120453/452868</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2005 20:19:19 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>JAG331</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Ok, a rolling jackpot would be great, starting at $100,000!Who knows if CT would give the players even more</p>]]></description>
			<category>JAG331</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #3</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/120453/452848</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/120453/452848</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2005 19:26:47 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>JimmySand9</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>I was thinking of a minimum $100,000 jackpot. I just never put it in there. I just realized that with the long streaks Cash5 has without winners, a jackpot could end up growing to huge proportions. Besides, I doubt anyone will recieve less than $100,000 considering there&#x27;s hardly ever more than 1 winner. This isn&#x27;t Take Five.</p>]]></description>
			<category>JimmySand9</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #2</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/120453/452845</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/120453/452845</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2005 19:23:48 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>JimmySand9</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>O.K. I figured out what to do with Classic Lotto.Connecticut Lotto. Now With More Winners!Pick 6 out of 42Minimum Jackpot : $500,000 20-Year Annuity  Prize Odds Match 6 JACKPOT 1 : 5,245,786 Match 5 $1,500 1 : 24,286 Match 4 $75 1 : 555 Match 3 $2 1 : 37 Overall Odds : 1 in 34.4</p>]]></description>
			<category>JimmySand9</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #1</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/120453/452841</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/120453/452841</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2005 19:17:33 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>JAG331</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Yes, yes, yes!  Playslips for Pick 3 4, couldn&#x27;t agree more!  I don&#x27;t know if it would change peoples behavior, but it gets irritating to stand in line listening to $1 backup on 888, $1 backup on 525, etc. etc.  you almost fall asleep in line!CT has a fantastic $100,000 payout on the 5/35 game.  If they messed with that I&#x27;d think more than twice about playing.</p>]]></description>
			<category>JAG331</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>CT Lottery - Is Jimmy Fun Or What?</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/120453</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/120453</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2005 18:56:01 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>JimmySand9</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Play 3-Play 4-Midday 3-Midday 4Begin offering playslips for these games. That&#x27;s right, you still have to say your numbers to the clerk in CT.Cash 5Begin a rolling jackpot feature. Judging by sales, the jackpot should grow by $25,000 with each winless drawing. A $500,000 jackpot could be a possibility. The wonderful Kicker feature would remain.Classic LottoThis is a little tough. It&#x27;s a good game, but with Powerball around it could be a little too big for it&#x27;s britches. I&#x27;ll get back to you on th... &#x5b;&#xa0;<a href="https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/120453">More</a>&#xa0;&#x5d;</p>]]></description>
			<category>JimmySand9</category>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

