Dynamic or flexible system(s).

Reply #19

LANTERN — Tue, 18 Oct 2005 04:12:46 GMT

Pick 3 7-1-2 Mon, Oct 17, 2005Another change. Maybe the combos will be more normal for the next few draws (?). Maybe some doubles also along the way (?).The Low = 0-5 The Middle = 2-7 and High = 4-9 is here again as it should, since that particular pattern should be the NORM, but don't expect that pattern too often on doubles and triples.Also remember the 3 to 7 Normal width or lenght difference of pick 3 combos and it is back on tonight draw.Do you see the straight consecutive pair 12 ?,... [ More ]

Reply #18

LANTERN — Tue, 18 Oct 2005 02:43:27 GMT

HypersoniqI have no experience with any jackpot kind of games so I can't say too much about them.From what very little and I mean very little that I have very briefly studied and I mean I just glanced at the past draws very very quickly I have seen some general patterns, but because of the number of combinations on those games I don't think that they are of much use, but I don't know, because I haven't yet tried to get winning numbers for those games.As to the pick 3, I can say without a shadow... [ More ]

Reply #17

hypersoniq — Tue, 18 Oct 2005 01:10:33 GMT

Here are a few of the roadblocks I ran into...#1 raw data. I have kept a running list of numbers for each given matrix, both sort and draw order. I have pored over each for endless hours just trying to find a rule of thumb or regular pattern... nada#2 Mechanical Bias. They post the machine# and Ballset # for each draw, BUT they use an active pool of four machines and ballsets, mixed up out of a total of well over 20 machines and ballsets... this is for both PB red ball and the white balls

Reply #16

LANTERN — Mon, 17 Oct 2005 18:45:47 GMT

Texas.0-0-0 Mon, Oct 17, 2005They are covering-up for the fact that I know that they always look at every single one of my posts since they found out about me a long time ago.I hope that I am not inconveniencing the state lottery people too much.This Takes the Cake does it not ?Another Mostly Low+Mostly Even, but Unveliebable another triple and a 000 on top of that.As I said They will always Scre_ the patterns in some unforeseen way So even if you had played the above pattern you would st... [ More ]

Reply #15

LANTERN — Mon, 17 Oct 2005 17:39:20 GMT

HyperGlad to see you back !As you know, it is all statistical possibilities that is where is at.And it's sister, also very very important: statistic impossibilities.But there is no Black White, only chades of gray or degrees.There are DEGREES of statistic possibilities and:Degrees of statistic impossibilities. Or:More Possible and Less Possible.There are as many POSSIBLE statistics as your imagination will allow for on pick 3 and maybe also on other lottery games.As WinD might say: CHANCES A... [ More ]

Reply #14

hypersoniq — Mon, 17 Oct 2005 03:34:07 GMT

the biggest problem I encountered when I tried to develop systems was that just when I thought I had identified a pattern or rule of thumb , the next few draws would undo it.my last effort was a combined attempt to meld a long-term system (full draw history) with a short-term system (last 3 draws) and that short term data provided the dynamic factor... not to any great result tho.you are most definitely right with the need for a dynamic system... my stat system proved to static even with a shor... [ More ]

Reply #13

LANTERN — Sun, 16 Oct 2005 10:57:39 GMT

410 LLL+EOE 5 SUM 5 ROOT 5 LDSR421 LLL+EEO 7 SUM 7 ROOT 7 LDSR408 LLH+EEE 12 SUM 3 ROOT 2 LDSRIf you had used Compound filters then all those patterns would had been different, have many filters and use different ones at different times, since there are so very many of them. That throws TLC and Gtech off and out, because they can't cope with all the so very many different filters and combinations.By the way the above are just the most common examples, there are very many more besides those, filt... [ More ]

Reply #12

LANTERN — Sun, 16 Oct 2005 08:25:48 GMT

Tx Sat Eve 410 Mostly Low+Mostly EvenAs you can see the Mostly low+Mostly Even Pattern has developed so far.The Texas game is kind of FIXED as we already new and so therefore is unbalanced and very prone to pattern trends and so if we keep track of them pattern trends there might be some chance of making some money here, but trends might keep on changing as TLC does seem to look at this.We will see.So far the last 3 draws were Mostly Low+Mostly Even.Did anybody make some money on this new tren... [ More ]

Reply #11

LANTERN — Sun, 16 Oct 2005 02:05:35 GMT

This in an update on the Texas draws:Combined Midday and Eve:421 Mostly Low+Mostly Even408 Mostly Low+Mostly Even175 Mostly High+Mostly Odd392 Mostly Low+ Mostly Odd684 Mostly High+ Mostly Even403 Mostly Low+ Mostly Even471 Mostly Low+Mostly OddRemember that they were mostly High.Now they are Mostly Low (for the moment until TLC sees this post (?) maybe). The Even and the Odd are about the same right now, it used to be Mostly Even untill my post about it, then they changed it.We will see how it

Reply #10

LANTERN — Sun, 16 Oct 2005 01:31:47 GMT

I am not too sure yet how, but the above could maybe be used as some kind of filters, I have not yet had enough time to think of how to use the above to help with the lottery, there might be a way or ways.By the way, very soon after my Texas post the draws for it (for Texas) normalized, they are no longer it seems mostly high and mostly even, Why is that ? Why so soon after my post about it ? Is TLC looking also at my posts ?That is why I quit posting, because of Reactions on the draws that I

Reply #9

LANTERN — Sat, 15 Oct 2005 03:57:39 GMT

This will be short tonight for I have little time right now.When I say degrees of change I mean for example if the last pick 3 number was 680 and the next was 936 the 6 changed 3 digits up from 6 to 9, the 8 moved down or up 5 digits, the 0 moved up 6 digits, so there were 14 digits of movement total for the whole number in that particular way, there were also other digit movements in other ways.When I say number of changes I mean the above example being 1 or 3 changes and also the change from E... [ More ]

Reply #8

LANTERN — Fri, 14 Oct 2005 18:34:41 GMT

The best key to winning might be a coordinated integration of all the different factors into one winning dynamic system.Easier said than done of course, but hardly impossible and also hardly improbable.We are getting there one small step at a time, as understanding seeps or comes in a little at a time.As they say, everything in it's own time.Or, the impossible now and miracles will take a little longer.The number of changes and their degree of change will of course change from draw to draw withi... [ More ]

Reply #7

LANTERN — Fri, 14 Oct 2005 18:24:33 GMT

There are patterns, statistics, changes+unchanges, degree of change+degree of no change.The games have both Static Components and Dynamic Components.They have their patterns and statistics.Also there are LOOPS of these things or CYCLES.

Reply #6

LANTERN — Fri, 14 Oct 2005 18:19:57 GMT

Yes, very true, you don't want to use a dynamic losing system.You need to know what you are doing.You don't just need a dynamic system.But you need a winning dynamic system.Almost anybody can have and use a dynamic system, but Will it be a winning or a losing system ?You (We) need to develop WINNING dynamic systems, not just any losing dynamic system.

Reply #5

LANTERN — Fri, 14 Oct 2005 18:14:02 GMT

As I said the same last combo will not keep on coming out draw after draw, there are no 100% unknowns, there are Degrees Of Change , there will be some degrees of change and there will be so many number of changes,.Just 1 degree of change and only just 1 change, that still makes the draws dynamic.There are no 100% unknowns.The I Ching of the lottery or the Lottery I Ching the book of lottery changes, by me, maybe one day (?).

Reply #4

RJOh — Fri, 14 Oct 2005 18:07:00 GMT

Having a dynamic or flexible system that continue to lose is no better than any other system that continue to lose. The results are the same.

Reply #3

JAP69 — Fri, 14 Oct 2005 17:59:58 GMT

I have a very flexible system.I changed my mind

Reply #2

LANTERN — Fri, 14 Oct 2005 17:55:49 GMT

A quick pick ?Even if you only play the one number, it might still be best to pick your own number(s).Who knows best, You or the computer terminal ?It is your dollar ! Pick your own number yourself

Reply #1

Chewie — Fri, 14 Oct 2005 17:39:42 GMT

I use a simple system, Go to store. Plop down a dollar. Leave store. Tomorrow, repeat. It would be dynamic if I actually won something larger than the initial investment total.

Dynamic or flexible system(s).

LANTERN — Fri, 14 Oct 2005 17:32:19 GMT

Some people post systems here, but they only work a small part of the time.Just like some or many filters work only sometimes, filter failures compound each other, so the more filters used the more often that they fail.A person most have a dynamic or flexible system, the draws move from a set of patterns to another, either quick or slowly, whatever part of your total system that you are using at a particular time most be the part that is working with that particular game at that particular time.... [ More ]