<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
	<channel>
		<title>MM Sales</title>
		<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/123046</link>
		<atom:link href="https://www.lotterypost.com/rss/topic/123046" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<description>Lottery Post Forum Topic: MM Sales</description>
		<dc:language>en-us</dc:language>
		<generator>Lottery Post RSS Generator</generator>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #4</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/123046/481445</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/123046/481445</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 16 Nov 2005 18:51:36 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Bradly_60</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>With the sales that they had the actual annuitized jackpot should be around $318.5 millionBrad</p>]]></description>
			<category>Bradly_60</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #3</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/123046/481437</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/123046/481437</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 16 Nov 2005 18:44:09 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Bradly_60</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Actually MI and IL and GA are all really close in sales together.  Which would mean they should have the same amount of winners every so often.  Texas is near the bottom of the list in terms of sales.  WA is the least performing state of the MM gain. Brad</p>]]></description>
			<category>Bradly_60</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #2</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/123046/481436</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/123046/481436</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 16 Nov 2005 18:41:05 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>qutgnt</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>I would say that Illinois is seriously overdue for a winner. I just dont say that since I live here but I couldnt even tell you the last time someone from here won.  I know we dont compare to NY, CA, TX, MI, or even WA but I think the lack of no winner here for a while has meant little buzz. I never see a line at any retailer in Chicago when the Mega gets super high.  I prefer Little Lotto anyway, (which i will win tonite by the way</p>]]></description>
			<category>qutgnt</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #1</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/123046/481433</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/123046/481433</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 16 Nov 2005 18:38:20 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Just6ntlc</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Well congratulations to CA winning the MM jackpot for 11/15 Bradly. I say NY will be next to win a MM jackpot. I know that CA isn&#x27;t making lots of MM sales than NY, but they have their jackpot winner before NY in terms of the new matrix.</p>]]></description>
			<category>Just6ntlc</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>MM Sales</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/123046</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/123046</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 16 Nov 2005 18:36:13 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Bradly_60</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Well we finally passed the $100,000,000 mark.  We haven&#x27;t done that in quite a long time. But you can so tell the difference between the old matrix and the new one.  When the jackpot was this high we would always see 40-50 second tier prizes and this time there was only 19.  That was less than the amount from a couple drawings ago.So really only 20 tickets matched the first five numbers and one happened to have the 7 as the mega ball.  With 46 mega balls there was a good chance of it acutally ro... &#x5b;&#xa0;<a href="https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/123046">More</a>&#xa0;&#x5d;</p>]]></description>
			<category>Bradly_60</category>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

