Programming a System

Reply #23

retxx — Fri, 02 Dec 2005 17:16:32 GMT

zoozie not being a programmer can not help but if you ask someone to apply first to eliminate per our conversation on filtering they will help us.

Reply #22

Zoozie — Fri, 02 Dec 2005 13:01:31 GMT

Hi All,Happy December! I am posting the daily results to this theory on my blog. This morning, I was finally able to figure out how to copy all the midday numbers that I am using to track the results. (I am still learning excel - wonderful program!)* At this point, I am NOT using real money to play online these numbers. Everything is still on paper. Since I started testing this theory, we are 4 straights wins out of 7 draws.This list of midday numbers are for those who have been sending m... [ More ]

Reply #21

RJOh — Thu, 01 Dec 2005 02:17:03 GMT

I would be happy if my final results could be displayed in 5x50 grid. Ohio Rolling Cash5(5/39) in worth $476,000 tomorrow so I may try to come up with such a grid for it to play. I played a 5/26 grid today and it only cost me $2 (26 line for $26 paid $24

Reply #20

retxx — Wed, 30 Nov 2005 15:50:50 GMT

zoozie; next suggestion. try filtering such as eliminate all even numbers and then see results. next eliminate all odd numbers. see results. It may surprise you. Do one step at a time. I will go to your blog now. Let us know how you make out.

Reply #19

hypersoniq — Wed, 30 Nov 2005 11:02:43 GMT

the final winning system output line in my project will betxtPick.Text = nextDrawit's the rest of the code that goes before it that has me at a loss...

Reply #18

hypersoniq — Wed, 30 Nov 2005 10:56:02 GMT

I know in PA's data, exact straight repeats are rarer than triples, so they are safe to eliminate.

Reply #17

Zoozie — Wed, 30 Nov 2005 04:45:54 GMT

Retxx,Of course! I would hope if someone had a great system, they would share it with me... also! :)So far, we are 2 for 2 on straight wins! Waiting for tonights results to come out. Check my blog... I actually upgraded so I could post my theories for everyone to view.I will tell you in a nutshell what I have done. Taken all 1000 numbers from pick 3. Used previous draws to eliminate numbers. Down to 370 numbers that have not been drawn - and we have had 2 straight hits doing this. Time w... [ More ]

Reply #16

retxx — Wed, 30 Nov 2005 03:04:42 GMT

zoozie;if you do get it down to 50 numbers then if you will share it we try it in our own states and compare notes as to where it seems to work best. Keep up the good work.

Reply #15

Zoozie — Tue, 29 Nov 2005 11:42:39 GMT

Hi Folks...Interesting posts. First, I just had a creative thought (like Einstein and millions of others) who took the plunge to actually push it further than just a thought. I do not think there is a system/program out there that is or ever will be 100% at picking lottery numbers - and I have tried A LOT of them!My thought process was to find a method of generating STRAIGHT numbers from previous draws on pick 3 and get within a 70% hit ratio... and to do this without breaking the bank buyin... [ More ]

Reply #14

hypersoniq — Tue, 29 Nov 2005 10:40:12 GMT

yes, cracking the game would require REPEATABLE success...

Reply #13

RJOh — Tue, 29 Nov 2005 06:45:41 GMT

In the Jackpot games, one jackpot win in a life time and you're going to show a profit for the rest of your life and in MegaMillions and PowerBall that's probably true if you're a 2nd prize winner, but that doesn't means you've cracked the game.

Reply #12

LANTERN — Tue, 29 Nov 2005 06:27:10 GMT

RJOHSome few people have already Cracked 1 or 2 of the daily games, as to the Jackpot games, I don't know.If they can make any kind of a long term profit, then they have cracked the game(s).

Reply #11

RJOh — Tue, 29 Nov 2005 06:16:40 GMT

I think Zoozie was interested in a system/theory that was in a program that could be tested many times in a short period of time. WINCOM0 = N1 + N2 +N3 + N4 + N5 may be part of the final line in a winning system, but it's a long way from being perfected.

Reply #10

LANTERN — Tue, 29 Nov 2005 06:00:23 GMT

There already are winning systems here, they just have to be perfected.Some, have been posted, others haven't.And this is just the very beginning.

Reply #9

time*treat — Tue, 29 Nov 2005 05:29:48 GMT

I am saliu-certain that with the amount of creativity and computing power among the sheer number of people here, that if this site continues to exist, if there is a system to be found, it will be done by a group or person here.

Reply #8

lottaloot — Tue, 29 Nov 2005 05:11:55 GMT

Good Luck

Reply #7

emilyg — Tue, 29 Nov 2005 02:21:16 GMT

cool keep us posted

Reply #6

Zoozie — Tue, 29 Nov 2005 02:15:59 GMT

Thanks to all who have helped...Actually received an excel format today from one of the lottery post members who compiled what I needed in a short amount of time.Will be testing my theory now and if all goes well - I will post all information on this board about it.Thanks

Reply #5

hypersoniq — Tue, 29 Nov 2005 01:35:48 GMT

can pre-existing software like excel do what you need? don't forget that excel contains it's own programming language (VBA, Visual Basic for Applications) and there are THOUSANDS of free tutorial sites and downloadable examples to get you going.try picking up programming as you go... when dealing with lottery systems programming, the journey(acquiring new skills, working the right side of the brain) is almost always more enjoyable than the destination (a failed test or debunked system

Reply #4

psykomo — Tue, 29 Nov 2005 01:15:58 GMT

THANKs Zoozie:Question.........are you ready to spend the money to developUPPPP$$$$$$your SYSTEM??When you MAKE money..............from your system can explain it too?????programmers, then you..............may have a WINNNNNNNNNeerrrrrrrrrrrrrr!Otherwise, you must invest your own money and try to WIN for YOURSELF.LOLPSYKOMO

Reply #3

RJOh — Tue, 29 Nov 2005 00:51:11 GMT

time*treat wrote: There are plenty of programmers around, you mainly have to decide what language you want to use. After all, you may want to tweak whatever they build for you. So you want a little familiarity with it. I agree, I've been tweaking my programs for years, I'm always coming up with a new twist to make the program work better (I think). If you can, you will always want to make it work better or vary how it works, the program will never be finished. That's what I like about programm... [ More ]

Reply #2

time*treat — Tue, 29 Nov 2005 00:32:08 GMT

There are plenty of programmers around, you mainly have to decide what language you want to use. After all, you may want to tweak whatever they build for you. So you want a little familiarity with it. some folks have even been known to post a few lines of code here and there.

Reply #1

RJOh — Tue, 29 Nov 2005 00:07:29 GMT

In reality, writing a program for a system is harder than doing it manually/by hand, it just that after you have done it once you can rerun the system many times with little or no additional effort.I program my systems using GWBasic which I learned years ago. Before ever starting to program a system, I do it manually a few times to test it and get an idea of weather it worth spending the effort and time to program it.If you've posted some good results from your system/theory then you shouldn't... [ More ]

Programming a System

Zoozie — Mon, 28 Nov 2005 16:02:18 GMT

Hi All!I have the creative side, but not the programming side. I have a theory that I would like to test... but would take hundreds of hours manually/by hand.Anyone out there willing to build me a simple program so I can test my theory? I think it would be fairly easy for those who program - and if my theory is correct... you will benefit tremendously!Send me a private message if you can do this.Thanks