<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
	<channel>
		<title>Phased Ocurrence Comparisons</title>
		<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/123851</link>
		<atom:link href="https://www.lotterypost.com/rss/topic/123851" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<description>Lottery Post Forum Topic: Phased Ocurrence Comparisons</description>
		<dc:language>en-us</dc:language>
		<generator>Lottery Post RSS Generator</generator>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #5</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/123851/490539</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/123851/490539</guid>
			<pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2005 02:56:10 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>JKING</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Hi,  Thanks everybody for your input. Paint1, For 6/47 here is one of my summaries over 201 games. The top horizontal row identifies lottery ball (1-5). The vertical column identifies how many times each occurrence occurred. So, Paint1, your assumption appears to be basically correct. My chart below would say that the best bet over a 5 game span would be 0-times, 0-times, 0-times, 1-times, and 1 to 2 times for the last ocurrence value. This proves to be a valuable filter, however it also leaves</p>]]></description>
			<category>JKING</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #4</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/123851/490145</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/123851/490145</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2005 16:41:37 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>RJOh</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>With a 6/49 games, using only the previous 4 or 5 drawings means you&#x27;re only including a maximum 24-30 of the 49 numbers in your number pool.  If the pool have any repeats, it&#x27;s even smaller so you should only have a few lines to play.</p>]]></description>
			<category>RJOh</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #3</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/123851/490140</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/123851/490140</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2005 16:28:48 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>paint1</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>For the 6/49 I go back 4 or 5 draws and count how many times each number has hit;   play the lowest hitters. Often get 4 numbers that way.</p>]]></description>
			<category>paint1</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #2</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/123851/490119</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/123851/490119</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2005 15:52:23 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>RJOh</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>I post a similar article earlier.  I assigned letters to the earliest previous drawing that each number in the winning combinations has appeared.  For example A=previous drawing, B=2 drawings back, J=10 drawings back, a=27 drawings back and etc. I then look for the most common words (A-S) to pick combinations to play.  I used the words because they do not focus on numbers and the numbers for my combinations fit similar words but are totally random. With MagaMillions, I haven&#x27;t had much luck with... &#x5b;&#xa0;<a href="https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/123851/490119">More</a>&#xa0;&#x5d;</p>]]></description>
			<category>RJOh</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #1</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/123851/490088</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/123851/490088</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2005 14:56:26 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>MrBobb</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>It&#x27;s been a while, but what I&#x27;ve done in the past is analyze blocks of 5 and 10 draws prior the the current draw, to look for patterns.Most often in the blocks of 10 previous draws, between 5 and 10 of the 39 balls were not drawn. Typically only 2 or 3 of the winning numbers in the current draw came from the past 10 draws. The was an occaisional 4 of 5 and only one or two 5 of 5 (going back about 300 draws).You might be interested in the following article: Frequency Distribution.</p>]]></description>
			<category>MrBobb</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Phased Ocurrence Comparisons</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/123851</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/123851</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2005 13:41:18 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>JKING</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Has anybody tried this approach for Pick5 type games?How many times did each number occur in..Games 1-15Games 16-30Games 31-45...etcI chose the 15 game spread above arbitrarily. So the first thing I&#x27;ll try to do is to find the optimum spread where a consistency can be found. Then use the info for the last equivalent game spread to determine what is due. Any thoughts</p>]]></description>
			<category>JKING</category>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

