<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
	<channel>
		<title>Judge taking CA MM lawsuit into.....</title>
		<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/124062</link>
		<atom:link href="https://www.lotterypost.com/rss/topic/124062" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<description>Lottery Post Forum Topic: Judge taking CA MM lawsuit into.....</description>
		<dc:language>en-us</dc:language>
		<generator>Lottery Post RSS Generator</generator>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #4</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/124062/509127</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/124062/509127</guid>
			<pubDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2005 21:56:11 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Chewie</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Because business writes the rules for lottery games, and business doesn&#x27;t like competition.  Why write a rule that would limit your profits?  Write one that gives you the best advantage, and get some flunky legislature to put their name on it and wallah, you have a law in your favor!  Think Olympics</p>]]></description>
			<category>Chewie</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #3</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/124062/509095</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/124062/509095</guid>
			<pubDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2005 21:12:25 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>WorldWide777</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Why can&#x27;t states have BOTH national lotteries (MM   PB</p>]]></description>
			<category>WorldWide777</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #2</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/124062/509082</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/124062/509082</guid>
			<pubDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2005 20:50:58 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>CASH Only</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>The MM group will regret not going after North Carolina if it loses CA. MM needs to stay in CA.</p>]]></description>
			<category>CASH Only</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #1</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/124062/491977</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/124062/491977</guid>
			<pubDate>Sun, 04 Dec 2005 00:25:39 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>bellyache</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>I totally agree with the fact that the winners from previous jackpots should still get paid even if MM ends up being taken out of CA. Hopefully however, Mega Millions ends up staying put.</p>]]></description>
			<category>bellyache</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Judge taking CA MM lawsuit into.....</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/124062</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/124062</guid>
			<pubDate>Sat, 03 Dec 2005 23:54:16 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Bradly_60</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>2005 3rd Quarter Press Releases: Article12.02.2005 SALES OF MEGA MILLIONS TO CONTINUE - Judge Takes Case Under Advisement SACRAMENTO   At a hearing today in Sacramento Superior Court, Judge Connelly decided to take under advisement a lawsuit questioning California s participation in the MEGA Millions game. Judge Connelly is a very careful jurist and we have every expectation that his analysis of the issues will be very thorough. In the meantime, the California State Lottery wants to assure its p... &#x5b;&#xa0;<a href="https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/124062">More</a>&#xa0;&#x5d;</p>]]></description>
			<category>Bradly_60</category>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

