80 percent hit system

Reply #15

pacattack05 — Mon, 05 Dec 2005 01:51:57 GMT

New numbers for 289:Just add six numbers to each of the following 91 numbers:012 016 022 026 042 054 060 064 087 102 103 108 109 117 127 145 165 170 183 184 190 209 228 230 254 256 257 270 278 279 313 316 334 344 354 361 371 373 387 406 409 437 443 446 461 469 470 472 478 499 547 558 559 560 566 567 573 582 603 609 614 616 619 620 627 631 633 654 663 675 701 713 718 720 723 727 729 735 737 738 756 769 778 785 799 802 833 875 885 912 930 961 980 986So for 012= playing 013 014 015 016 017 018...an... [ More ]

Reply #14

pacattack05 — Mon, 05 Dec 2005 01:23:14 GMT

Oh well 289 for tonight in FL. I had 259. There's always tomorrow.

Reply #13

pacattack05 — Sun, 04 Dec 2005 23:28:04 GMT

I just counted around 126 doubles. Probably off by a little, but around 126.433 minus 126=307 numbers to play, but I want to keep the doubles.So the total remains at 433.

Reply #12

pacattack05 — Sun, 04 Dec 2005 23:21:37 GMT

I just noticed something. I really don't like to use filters, but one good filter is to exclude doubles from those 433 numbers, if you don't think they're due, and guess what, there's alot of them.I'm going there right now to see how much reduction can be made by eliminating the doubles.Warning: Spending that amount of money, one might rethink the idea of reducing by doing away with the doubles. Those doubles are there for a reason. Infact, two of the wins in my test period were doubles. You jus... [ More ]

Reply #11

pacattack05 — Sun, 04 Dec 2005 21:41:55 GMT

Thanx...good idea. I have a feeling that this is just a temporary trend and nothing will come out of all this. I'm just doing this for fun to see if some crazy idea might pan out.Believe me, I don't have four hundred dollars, or even 108 dollars to fork out, however, I will find a way to get that sort of money if this hits in the profit zone, in the long run.Until then, I'm gonna actually have to work for a living...LOL

Reply #10

rlevins — Sun, 04 Dec 2005 21:09:47 GMT

congratulations. looks like a stunning discovery/invention. Why don't you try this without actually playing for say 2 or 3 months and see how much you could have made. And post the results after that period.

Reply #9

pacattack05 — Sun, 04 Dec 2005 20:06:37 GMT

dman....here's how it works. Will use a set of 5 numbers instead of 80 to make it easier.Lets say the program spit out the following 5 sets of numbers to be played for the next draw:Only an example set:538298173193551Looking back and testing the 11 days I saw the winning numbers so close, so I looked to see in which direction they were off by. In other words, were they higher or lower?So as an example the winning number would lets say be 542. See how it was just 4 numbers higher than 538. The hi... [ More ]

Reply #8

pacattack05 — Sun, 04 Dec 2005 19:55:28 GMT

The seed 666 was used with no intention in mind. Just came to my head...

Reply #7

pacattack05 — Sun, 04 Dec 2005 19:52:39 GMT

Thanx tntea......Powerplayer: I tried pming the link but stoopendaal did something that it won't work. Ask him for it.

Reply #6

dman2005 — Sun, 04 Dec 2005 19:40:18 GMT

Pac,How or what was the rationale behind using the 666 as the seed?? Obviously you are playing these 1.00 straight...hhmm....let me see if I am understanding this correctly... 325+ 666--------981 correct?.....you just add 6 to every number... The total above is 433 numbers. With a $900.00 payout, nets $467.00. So, that means you are playing a butt load of sets...HOLY SMOKES...to rich for my blood...hmmm...and then up above that you said you would pick from the list of 80 sets.....as I said pre... [ More ]

Reply #5

powerplayer — Sun, 04 Dec 2005 19:38:35 GMT

Pacattack,Can that program be redesign just a tad bit for me.Send me a pm...I think you solved my problem I was having with my program I'm building.I want itPowerplayer

Reply #4

tntea — Sun, 04 Dec 2005 19:33:37 GMT

Pilot Deflation = 139 184 634 068 518 563

Reply #3

tntea — Sun, 04 Dec 2005 19:33:16 GMT

018(180,801,810) 057(075,705,750) 059(095,590,950) 159(195,591,951) 176(671,716,761) 234(243,423,432) 348(384,438,843) Tier 3068(086,860) 069(096,690) 077(707,770) 078(087,708) 118(181,811) 129(192,921) 158(815,851) 163(316,361) 177(717,771) 183(813,831) 225(252,522) 235(253,523) 249(492,924) 347(437,734) 357(735,753) 415(451,541) 546(564,645)Tier 2066(606) 084(840) 091(190) 093(309) 126(162) 127(721) 174(417) 194(491) 237(372) 244(424) 248(842) 255(525) 257(752) 258(852) 315(351) 336(363) 338(3... [ More ]

Reply #2

pacattack05 — Sun, 04 Dec 2005 19:13:24 GMT

It's just a simple program stoopendaal wrote for me. You just input last night's winning number, and hit go. It looks at a list of 100,000 numbers.( The exact same list every time )and sees what numbers came out after it. You can adjust the seed but I kept the same for 11 days. I would have won 8 out of the 11 days. Not bad huh?Since the numbers were so close to the winning number, I had to modify it by adding 6 numbers to each number to spread it out like a net. It's like spreading a net out to... [ More ]

Reply #1

dman2005 — Sun, 04 Dec 2005 19:03:09 GMT

hhmmm...not sure I understand this....looks interesting tho...

80 percent hit system

pacattack05 — Sun, 04 Dec 2005 18:50:06 GMT

I just tested stoopendaal's little program that looks back at 100,000 numbers and finds what numbers came after a win.However, by redoing an 11 day test, with the number 666 as the seed, I saw that the winning number was off within 6 numbers higher,( for example if the winning number was 513, the number spit out by the program, the night before was 510...within the 6 higher numbers. So I would have played , 511,512,513,514,515,516,.) from the list of about 80 numbers. For the 11 day run I hit e... [ More ]