<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
	<channel>
		<title>Deflating some Results for a test</title>
		<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/126234</link>
		<atom:link href="https://www.lotterypost.com/rss/topic/126234" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<description>Lottery Post Forum Topic: Deflating some Results for a test</description>
		<dc:language>en-us</dc:language>
		<generator>Lottery Post RSS Generator</generator>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #7</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/126234/517205</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/126234/517205</guid>
			<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2006 23:56:04 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>tntea</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>I am nearly through with my OLD method chart.. I have back tested it in several states..What I am seeing is that using the chart.. you will get several hits from one string..  I am going to do a match up with the vtrac method to see if I can get those down to a few numbers to run.. so Straight playing would be the only way I play..I know you are not into vtracs.. but once the OLD method chart is posted.. I would love for you to back check a few states and see what youreyes pick upon.. and how we... &#x5b;&#xa0;<a href="https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/126234/517205">More</a>&#xa0;&#x5d;</p>]]></description>
			<category>tntea</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #6</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/126234/517149</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/126234/517149</guid>
			<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2006 22:01:27 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>CalifDude</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>No, I wasn&#x27;t suggesting that anyone was actually putting money on these.  When I try a method I like to know how my method did against  the odds .  All I was trying to say was if you get more than 17-18 hits, your method is working better than just playing random numbers.  We all strive to have a method that does better than random!!I tried something midday today in my 13 states that totally bombed ... not one winner</p>]]></description>
			<category>CalifDude</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #5</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/126234/517144</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/126234/517144</guid>
			<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2006 21:55:54 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>tntea</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Actually this is for the test run.. and I am seeing which states are picking up in what should have gone to the states in the test..Not looking too good right now..  I am not playing these in all states.. lol  Cannot afford that...I wouldn&#x27;t take a chance of losing that much bankroll...</p>]]></description>
			<category>tntea</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #4</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/126234/516670</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/126234/516670</guid>
			<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2006 04:49:28 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>CalifDude</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>You have 18 12-way numbers and 21 24-way numbers.  That means that you have covered 720 of the total 10,000 Pick 4 combos or 7.2%.  Since there are 20 Midday and 28 Evening draws that gives a total for Monday through Friday of 240 draws.  The odds are you will have 240 X 7.2% or 17-18 hits Monday through Friday.That should give you an idea how well your method is working verses random numbers.</p>]]></description>
			<category>CalifDude</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #3</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/126234/516660</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/126234/516660</guid>
			<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2006 04:37:12 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>tntea</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Washington, D.C.      3-9-0-0</p>]]></description>
			<category>tntea</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #2</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/126234/516659</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/126234/516659</guid>
			<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2006 04:35:13 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>tntea</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Quebec  8-9-3-2</p>]]></description>
			<category>tntea</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #1</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/126234/516657</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/126234/516657</guid>
			<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2006 04:34:18 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>tntea</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Oregon (1pm   7pm)  5-1-6-8</p>]]></description>
			<category>tntea</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Deflating some Results for a test</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/126234</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/126234</guid>
			<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jan 2006 23:20:51 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>tntea</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>0039 0057 0138 0147 0156 0255 0299 0336 0345 0479 0499 0569 0578 0589 0677 0679 1128 1146 1227 1236 1245 1289 1388 1469 1478 1489 1568 1588 1667 1669 1678 2279 2389 2477 2479 2558 2569 2578 2677This is a test I am doing with vtracs..GA,IL,IN,MD,TNwere included in the test..My filter skills are weak, so I suggest we watch these this week and see where improvements are needed..</p>]]></description>
			<category>tntea</category>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

