<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
	<channel>
		<title>New Jersyans:  What to do with Pick 6.</title>
		<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/126559</link>
		<atom:link href="https://www.lotterypost.com/rss/topic/126559" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<description>Lottery Post Forum Topic: New Jersyans:  What to do with Pick 6.</description>
		<dc:language>en-us</dc:language>
		<generator>Lottery Post RSS Generator</generator>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #5</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/126559/521898</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/126559/521898</guid>
			<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2006 18:43:50 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>JimmySand9</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>So what you&#x27;re saying is there should only be one game that can set you for life, and such a game should be the one that has astronomical odds (as opposed to merely exospheric).</p>]]></description>
			<category>JimmySand9</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #4</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/126559/521877</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/126559/521877</guid>
			<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2006 18:28:50 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Just6ntlc</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>I would definately drop it as my vote. They already have Mega Millions which has a very high payouts. If they keep New Jersey Lotto, they should advertise the jackpot based on sales. For example, if it starts @ 1 million and rolls, it should go up based on sales [Ex. 1.3 million, etc].</p>]]></description>
			<category>Just6ntlc</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #3</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/126559/520264</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/126559/520264</guid>
			<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jan 2006 01:11:59 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>JimmySand9</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Further detail of above format suggestion:Pick 6 out of 46Price : $1Drawings Monday, Thursday, and SaturdayPrizeOddsMatch 6Jackpot (25% of sales)1 : 9,366,819Match 5Avg. $2,7321 : 39,028Match 4Avg. $561 : 801Match 3$5 Fixed1 : 47Overall Odds : 1 in 44.7</p>]]></description>
			<category>JimmySand9</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #2</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/126559/519763</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/126559/519763</guid>
			<pubDate>Sat, 14 Jan 2006 05:06:11 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>JimmySand9</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Good question. All I can think of is more money for matching 3. $3 seems kind of low, but hey, better than what the old format had ($0 for 3). Maybe return to the 6/46 format with a $5 prize for matching 3, with the same average payouts for 4 and 5 as the 6/49 has now. Sure there might not be as much in the jackpot, but that niche is going to Mega Millions anyway. This would be a welcome change.</p>]]></description>
			<category>JimmySand9</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #1</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/126559/519639</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/126559/519639</guid>
			<pubDate>Sat, 14 Jan 2006 01:21:56 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>CASH Only</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>NJ Pick-6 Lotto probably should not be changed, or replaced. It&#x27;s an alternative to the cheapo NY Lotto.NJ had Lotzee, with a $500,000 lump sum top prize. It had the same format as OR Lose for Life.</p>]]></description>
			<category>CASH Only</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>New Jersyans:  What to do with Pick 6.</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/126559</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/126559</guid>
			<pubDate>Sat, 14 Jan 2006 01:17:31 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Prob988</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>The New Jersey Pick 6 lottery, in spite of a much inflated annuity payout (the cash value is concealed from players) is clearly doing poorly.It is very rare for an advertised annuity value to rise by even 1 million dollars after a rollover; more typical is a rollover of $200,000.The old pick 6, which had better odds, did better, but it had the luxury of existing before New Jersey was a MegaMillions or Big Game State.I can&#x27;t believe that New Jersey hasn&#x27;t acted with respect to this game.  It can... &#x5b;&#xa0;<a href="https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/126559">More</a>&#xa0;&#x5d;</p>]]></description>
			<category>Prob988</category>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

