Ok here is what I promised. :)

Reply #107

Raven62 — Sun, 05 Feb 2006 04:18:58 GMT

Numbers Straight Boxed

Wheeled Combinations Combinations

4 256 035

5 625 070

6 1296 125

7 2401 210

8 4096 330

9 6561 495

10 10000 715

Above figures include: Singles, Doubles, Double-Doubles, Triples, Quads

Reply #106

truecritic — Sat, 04 Feb 2006 20:58:30 GMT

cps10

Seeing cashman's explanation, I am curious to know if that is the math you used for your profitable workouts

Reply #105

cps10 — Sat, 04 Feb 2006 20:48:32 GMT

truecritic - let me know if I can help out a little more

Reply #104

truecritic — Sat, 04 Feb 2006 20:45:56 GMT

Thanks cashman, clears up the issue.

Reply #103

Cashman87 — Sat, 04 Feb 2006 20:40:48 GMT

I don't follow the wrap around method, as most do, which is ofcourse part of lottery math.

But, when using the power number 12, I ignore it.

In case with 899, I would just add the 2 together....101+111= 1111.

10-12=-2, which I would list as 02.

0-12=-12 which I would list as 12.

78+12=80....not 90. :)

This method, though a very simple, and basic use of the power number 12, is useless without mixing .

By mixing, I mean, by knowing what e... [ More ]

Reply #102

truecritic — Sat, 04 Feb 2006 17:15:59 GMT

Sorry about the previous post being one giant paragraph. I edited it 4 times and it looks fine, until it actually gets posted. And now it won't let me edit it again. It refuses to break everything into paragraphs!

Maybe Todd knows why? Also, for Todd...how come line breaks are formatted this way

< instead of this way

< ? And when I used them in previous posts the line break resulted is a huge space between lines rather than a space the size of the font. Why is that... [ More ]

Reply #101

truecritic — Sat, 04 Feb 2006 16:43:34 GMT

Need math help

Cashman

also cps10 because I'd like to know how you handled these in your tests

As I got involved, I see the possibility of different digits coming up, depending on the math. Since math is unforgiving, I need a definitive answer.

First I need to know exactly what you do, Cashman. Looking at your original description in the 1st post, I see the following:

Ex. 78+12 = 90......85+12=97

78-12=66 85-12=73

It appears to me that you simply a... [ More ]

Reply #100

cps10 — Fri, 03 Feb 2006 19:16:36 GMT

AND Missouri...

Reply #99

cps10 — Fri, 03 Feb 2006 19:15:57 GMT

It's going okay. So far NJ has passed, and Georgia has not busted me out yet. So that leaves me with TX and a couple others.

Reply #98

Raven62 — Fri, 03 Feb 2006 19:02:09 GMT

I've been looking for a Program which would do just that, but so far I have found nothing. How's it going with the back testing

Reply #97

Raven62 — Thu, 02 Feb 2006 16:44:05 GMT

Sounds good: New ideas keep the blood flowing. Looking forward to what you discover.

Reply #96

cps10 — Thu, 02 Feb 2006 16:07:51 GMT

If you could, please post that here too, four4me

Reply #95

four4me — Thu, 02 Feb 2006 16:00:02 GMT

Raven I didn't get real extensive just played with his idea and I saw a bunch of times when using his pick 3 idea that 3 digits in the workout were also in the next drawings pick 4 numbers. I venture to say if I had time I might find doing a lil back testing that the pick 3 results for his idea will yield the pick 4 digits that hit in the next draw.

Finding the 4th digit to go with the pick 3 digits that are made from his idea might require adding the longest digit out in pick 4 or the hotte... [ More ]

Reply #94

cps10 — Thu, 02 Feb 2006 15:58:37 GMT

Raven - no, what I am saying is that say you wheel 7 numbers in a Pick 3 game. The number of TOTAL combinations for that is 343.

Now, take away the 7 triples, and you are left with 336 combinations, of which 126 are doubles and 210 are singles. So, that brings me to:

42 boxed doubles and

35 boxed singles

So this is what I am looking for with the Pick 4....

When you wheel 4 numbers, 5 number, 6 numbers, 7 numbers and 8 numbers, what are the total number of BOXED combinat... [ More ]

Reply #93

Raven62 — Thu, 02 Feb 2006 15:40:23 GMT

Are you seeing a correlation between Pick-3 and Pick-4 in Maryland using Cashmans Methods

Reply #92

Raven62 — Thu, 02 Feb 2006 15:36:22 GMT

OK! Let me get this right: You have 4 numbers (1234) in Pick-4 its a 24-way box, and since you know 1234 already, you want the other 23 combinations in the 24-way box.

Reply #91

four4me — Thu, 02 Feb 2006 15:21:41 GMT

i can say I see possibilities for using cashmans idea to win pick 4.... do a little back testing with your pick 3 numbers and compare the results in your states pick 4 games.

Reply #90

cps10 — Thu, 02 Feb 2006 15:01:45 GMT

Raven - that is correct. That is kind of what I am looking for with the Pick 4. Except instead of straight combinations, I want the number of boxed combos.

Reply #89

Raven62 — Thu, 02 Feb 2006 05:19:58 GMT

If I understand you correctly: When you wheel 4 numbers for the Pick3 you get 8 combinations.

Reply #88

cps10 — Wed, 01 Feb 2006 20:12:40 GMT

Thanks a lot! As you can see, I am trying to figure out the total number of combinations (single/double/triple/quad) for the amount of numbers I would like to wheel. I guess if I wanted to wheel 4 numbers, that would be:

4x4x4x4 = 256 combinations (although I don't know the breakdown and would also need them boxed, so that would probably lower it to 10-20 total boxed combos.

Reply #87

Raven62 — Wed, 01 Feb 2006 20:04:07 GMT

Ininuga is a PC program, intended for creation or improvement

(minimization) of abbreviated lotto wheels. It allows any choice of

parameters (v, k, t, m) in range 1..32. (See: What are Wheels for

explanation) A typical time to do this job varies from fraction of a

second to several hours, depending on parameters (and consequently the

wheel size). A non optimized (far too big) wheel is made fast, then

reduction goes ever slower. When started from scratch, the final size

is not always impre... [ More ]

Reply #86

cps10 — Wed, 01 Feb 2006 19:54:22 GMT

Raven - no I havent. Please fill me in.

Going back to the progression...there is no real way to beat these numbers without a progression. Flat betting will burn you down after a bunch of losses in a row. At least this way you can get a profit each time you hit.

Reply #85

Raven62 — Wed, 01 Feb 2006 19:51:51 GMT

Have you tried Ininuga

Reply #84

cps10 — Wed, 01 Feb 2006 19:24:56 GMT

TC - I used a boxed ticket with a 0.25 bet on a 37.50 payout. It uses a progression, so if you were betting flat, you would not be able to achieve those kinds of results. And it depends on the numbers that needed to be wheeled.

Anybody have a boxed wheel for Pick 4, with 4-, 5-, 6-, 7-, 8- numbers?

Thx

Reply #83

truecritic — Wed, 01 Feb 2006 19:18:57 GMT

cps

>$3,090.75 profit from 1/1/05 to 12/10/05

What did you use to calculate a profit? $1 ticket? Straight? Box? Both?

Payout: $500? $900

Reply #82

Raven62 — Wed, 01 Feb 2006 19:17:41 GMT

Makes sense! Thanks

Reply #81

cps10 — Wed, 01 Feb 2006 19:14:09 GMT

Raven - once I find that it works okay, then I will let the proverbial cat out of the bag . I don't want to waste anyone's time looking at it if it doesn't work fullscale, you know

Reply #80

Raven62 — Wed, 01 Feb 2006 19:10:13 GMT

That looks promising. I guess we'll have to find out what your new discovery is.

I usually look at Midday and Evening separately, but maybe I should consider them together to see what happens.

Reply #79

cps10 — Wed, 01 Feb 2006 18:55:21 GMT

Results for NEW JERSEY:

I used Combined, as the individuals were not working (although they might with my new discovery):

$3,090.75 profit from 1/1/05 to 12/10/05

Reply #78

gilla — Wed, 01 Feb 2006 18:33:36 GMT

thanks, would like to see what you see also.

Reply #77

emilyg — Wed, 01 Feb 2006 18:27:29 GMT

thanks - let us know.

Reply #76

cps10 — Wed, 01 Feb 2006 18:25:30 GMT

I did both...I split them out and then I combined them. The Evening wasn't working for me, and then the Combined didn't, so I just kind of gave up, but I realized a mistake I made that might fix GEORGIAs problem.

Reply #75

emilyg — Wed, 01 Feb 2006 17:39:17 GMT

thanks - you combine

Reply #74

cps10 — Wed, 01 Feb 2006 17:36:34 GMT

emily - I actually screwed that one up in GA...I didn;t allow enough time for it to hit, so I am going to retest it.

Reply #73

emilyg — Wed, 01 Feb 2006 16:44:21 GMT

thanks for letting us know.

Reply #72

cps10 — Wed, 01 Feb 2006 14:39:39 GMT

Well, based on what I have been working on, the 12 doesn't work in Georgia...NJ doesn't work on separate drawings, but so far has tested positive on a combined effort. More to come.

Reply #71

BobP — Wed, 01 Feb 2006 06:56:15 GMT

When I asked where the #12 power number came from, I didn't mean the first post where cashman gave it to us. I meant where did he get it from?

Clearly a power number of 12 only works a certain number of times, like when Steve Player gives an example for one of his systems without giving away the whole thing.

Let's say the 12 is based on the sum of a previous drawing, that would mean 28 potential power numbers.

A system like this needs a trigger or it's just probability all over ag... [ More ]

Reply #70

Raven62 — Wed, 01 Feb 2006 04:36:53 GMT

Quote: Originally posted by algamz on January 31, 2006Where is the logic, in using, +123 or -123, or for that matter, why not use 916 + or 916-.

Or any combination of numbers, positive or negative.

I would surmise, that at a particular time, these numbers added and subtracted, produced results,

affirming the "system" worked.

Let's think outside the overworked "box" and see if we can come up with totally new ways

to forecast the next Pick 3... [ More ]

Reply #69

four4me — Wed, 01 Feb 2006 04:29:35 GMT

It's the general consensus to take anyone's ideas and work them to death when all one has to do is follow the first post cashman87 made on this topic.

Reply #68

algamz — Wed, 01 Feb 2006 04:18:20 GMT

Where is the logic, in using, +123 or -123, or for that matter, why not use 916 + or 916-.

Or any combination of numbers, positive or negative.

I would surmise, that at a particular time, these numbers added and subtracted, produced results,

affirming the system worked.

Let's think outside the overworked box and see if we can come up with totally new ways

to forecast the next Pick 3

A... [ More ]

Reply #67

cps10 — Wed, 01 Feb 2006 03:43:54 GMT

Will try out Texas as well

Reply #66

Ms5PennieGen — Wed, 01 Feb 2006 02:51:53 GMT

Texas please

Reply #65

cps10 — Wed, 01 Feb 2006 02:41:44 GMT

You guys got it! I will start on this tonight and finish it up tomorrow.

Reply #64

cmpmcg25 — Wed, 01 Feb 2006 02:25:48 GMT

MO. please! Thank you,

Reply #63

Raven62 — Wed, 01 Feb 2006 02:17:05 GMT

NJ - Please

Reply #62

emilyg — Wed, 01 Feb 2006 02:08:30 GMT

georgia - thank you

Reply #61

cps10 — Wed, 01 Feb 2006 02:07:19 GMT

I think I have got some of it figured out. Not only does it have to do with the +/- 12, you also need to use filtering and wheeling. I just took a random state, NEBRASKA for crying out loud, found a way to use the numbers to make money in that state.

I don't really have a lot of time to do all states that post Pick-3, but I will be glad to run a drawing for the first 5 of you who ask just to see if this works. If it doesn't then I will let you know and go back to the drawing board. So if ther... [ More ]

Reply #60

mglsr — Wed, 01 Feb 2006 01:43:23 GMT

Quote: Originally posted by pacattack05 on January 30, 2006 Let's see for tonight's Florida. Last night it was 464.

46+12=58

64+12=76

46-12=34

64-12=52

So, 5876, and 3452

587-586-576-876-345-342-352-452

2nd draw 586 str pacattack05

didn't cashman say to play for 3 or 4 draws

Reply #59

Cashman87 — Tue, 31 Jan 2006 22:35:48 GMT

Hey guys!!

I'll be able to post maybe once in a while! Didn't think I could, but, here I am!! Maybe once a week, once every 2-3 weeks....

I'll try to post some numbers when I can. I have about 15 minutes of free time right now.

Just thought I'd post here. Although my method of using #12 as a power number may seem like something that was used before, it has nothing to do with what Tenaj described above which has been used for generations. #12 is only one of the many... [ More ]

Reply #58

cps10 — Tue, 31 Jan 2006 20:08:05 GMT

Found some good info on this:

https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/119279.htm

This gives combos for boxed wheels using 5, 6, 7 numbers, courtesy of LANTERN

5 numbers yields 20 Doubles, 10 Singles, 5 Triples

6 numbers yields 30 Doubles, 20 Singles, 6 Triples

7 numbers yields 42 Doubles, 35 Singles, 7 Triples

Very useful especially for this 12 +/- Discussion

By the way, the way I did this with the 40 combos finally crapped out, so I am going back to the drawing board with this... [ More ]

Reply #57

cps10 — Tue, 31 Jan 2006 19:46:38 GMT

My wife took a class at Brouhard Jewelry School in Mansfield.

Reply #56

RJOh — Tue, 31 Jan 2006 19:42:06 GMT

I'm in Mansfield an awful lot.

Reply #55

cps10 — Tue, 31 Jan 2006 19:38:54 GMT

Thanks RJOh - I was just trying to figure out how many there were of each, not necessarily what they were. If this one experiment works, then I will have to try and do that.

Whereabouts in Ohio are you? I am in Springfield an awful lot.

Reply #54

RJOh — Tue, 31 Jan 2006 19:34:21 GMT

If you can get your hand on a copy of the old Maybelle QuikWheel program, it will print out all your choices. Good luck to you.

Reply #53

RJOh — Tue, 31 Jan 2006 19:31:03 GMT

If you exclude doubles and triples and only play box then for a pick3 there are only 10 combinations.

1: 123

2: 124

3: 125

4: 134

5: 135

6: 145

7: 234

8: 235

9: 245

10: 345

For a pick4 the same conditions would be 625 combinations.

Reply #52

cps10 — Tue, 31 Jan 2006 19:27:47 GMT

Man I am flustered...what I meant was for a boxed 5 wheeler we have 20 doubles, 10 singles...sheesh!

Thanks RJ and CD.

Reply #51

cps10 — Tue, 31 Jan 2006 19:26:21 GMT

Okay, so a boxed 5-wheeler is 10 doubles, 30 singles, correct?

What about a boxed 6-wheeler or a 7-wheeler boxed?

Obviously I want to avoid the triples...

Reply #50

RJOh — Tue, 31 Jan 2006 19:24:38 GMT

In a pick3 if you wheel five numbers you will have 125 combinations.

1: 111

2: 112

3: 113

4: 114

5: 115

6: 121

7: 122

8: 123

9: 124

10: 125

11: 131

12: 132

13: 133

14: 134

15: 135

16: 141

17: 142

18: 143

19: 144

20: 145

21: 151

22: 152

23: 153

24: 154

25: 155

26: 211

27: 212

28: 213

29: 214

30: 215

31: 221

32: 222

33: 223

34: 224

35: 225

36: 231

37: 232

38: 233

39: 234

40: 235

41: 241

42: 242

43: 243

44: 244

45: 245

46: 251

47: 252

48: 253

49: 2... [ More ]

Reply #49

CalifDude — Tue, 31 Jan 2006 19:21:27 GMT

CPS, you are right for a straight, but I play for a box, so just a 5-digit wheel would be 10 non-doubles and 20 doubles.

Reply #48

cps10 — Tue, 31 Jan 2006 19:18:26 GMT

If you are just using singles, then it would be:

5 x 4 x 3 = 60

Reply #47

cps10 — Tue, 31 Jan 2006 19:16:43 GMT

CD - agreed. I am also a believer that if you keep playing the same numbers, one will eventually turn up.

Can anyone tell me how many combinations there are if you are using only 5 numbers? For instance, if you are using all 10 numbers, then you have 1000 combos:

10 x 10 x 10

But if you use 5 numbers, is that 5 x 5 x 5 = 125

Reply #46

CalifDude — Tue, 31 Jan 2006 19:13:47 GMT

I'm slowly becoming a believer of picking a set of numbers using whatever method one chooses and then stick with that same set for a period of time ... like a few days or a week at most. The reason for this is obvious. It is the same principle that people use when they post all states on the prediction page ... it has to hit somewhere sometime!! If you change your numbers every draw, in theory, you could ALWAYS miss! The only thing I don't like about keeping the same set of numbers is that... [ More ]

Reply #45

cps10 — Tue, 31 Jan 2006 18:17:09 GMT

CD - you are very welcome. Random numbers might work just as well, you could be right. I will investigate further. I am next going to test the dependency on the next drawing, meaning I will take a drawing and its number, divide up as Cashman does, and if it wins the next day, great. If it doesn't, I will take that drawing and divide IT up and play the next day. That will allow me to see if random numbers might be better.

Best,

cps10

Reply #44

CalifDude — Tue, 31 Jan 2006 16:49:21 GMT

Also thanks to Tenaj for explaining how cashman87 was doing it. But I can't afford it, so didn't follow it very closely as the thread progressed.

Reply #43

CalifDude — Tue, 31 Jan 2006 16:46:51 GMT

Playing 40 combos is 40/220 = 18% of the total numbers. So, playing random numbers would give you 18% wins. I'm not sure how many draws were involved, but someone could do the math and figure out how much better than random this method is.

In a 2-week period SC would have 26 draws so just playing random numbers should give over 4 hits in the 2-week period.

Is it better than random? I don't know..I just don't feel good enough to spend the time to look closer at the info that cps10 prov... [ More ]

Reply #42

Lottoways — Tue, 31 Jan 2006 16:41:38 GMT

Thanks Cashman,

Very nice of you to do share that.

Good luck and health to you.

Lottoways

Reply #41

cps10 — Tue, 31 Jan 2006 16:31:46 GMT

Just did a test on the 12 +/- pairs. 40 combos to play each drawing.

SC Evening: for the month of January 2006, progressive betting: +160.50, highest drawdown: 240.00

SC Evening: for the month of January 2006, flat betting: +8.00, highest drawdown: 80.00

SC Midday: for the month of January 2006, progressive betting: -29.00, highest drawdown: 176.00 (once there is a hit, this negative will be wiped out)

SC Midday: for the month of January 2006, flat betting: -90.00, highest drawdown

Reply #40

Tenaj — Tue, 31 Jan 2006 16:20:52 GMT

Raven. I was wondering if he used the Egyptian method (Lottery Math- don't carry) 3 digit numbers do wrap instead of going above 9 or below 0 (000-999) mirrors on the 5th and return back to itself of the 11th.

Cashman's workout is a shortcut to the rundown 123 plus minus system and what a clever tool it is.

For those folks who either don't understand how it works or it's just too tedious for them to rundown a number. The reason the number 12 is used is because a number returns to it... [ More ]

Reply #39

Blackapple — Tue, 31 Jan 2006 14:52:53 GMT

03 31 ADD

43 43

46 74

03 31

34 34

37 65

*********

Results 46--74

37--65

***************

Now Subtract

03 31

43 43

60 98

03 31

34 34

79 07

*********

60-79 98-07

************

Total Results

46--74

37--65

60--98

97--70*****

**************

Add Key digit 2,3,6 or 5

Thu Jan 5 '064, 0, 3500

Wed Jan 4 '062, 9, 0500... [ More ]

Reply #38

Blackapple — Tue, 31 Jan 2006 14:30:13 GMT

The Perfect flow found of three out

Looking for digits out.

Another example

Quote: Originally posted by Blackapple on December 30, 2005 Thu, Dec 29, 20050-1-3

Wed, Dec 28, 20055-8-4

Tue, Dec 27, 20054-7-1

Mon, Dec 26, 20051-0-5

Sun, Dec 25, 20058-0-1

Digits out 2,9,6

*********************************************

296

269

629

*******

174 714 741

629 269 296

538 350 385FIND column LDR

8 1 8 5

Reply #37

Blackapple — Tue, 31 Jan 2006 14:16:30 GMT

All together

40-----16

31-----07

64----30

73----49

********************

If I use/annex

key digits(1,2,8 or 9)

to the above pairs created

169 =Hit

492=Hit

Tue, Jan 24, 20062-9-4===94

Mon, Jan 23, 20065-8-2

Sun, Jan 22, 20061-9-6====16-

Right choice of digits outs

it works.

Reply #36

Blackapple — Tue, 31 Jan 2006 14:11:20 GMT

073 037

528 582

619 491

7 0 3 0

So we are using these TTTs

I tell you the red digits are

key numbers 1,2,8,9

Reply #35

Blackapple — Tue, 31 Jan 2006 13:57:06 GMT

Because

A B C

073 037 307

528 582 852

619 491 941 LDR below column

7 0 3 0 3 no flow

See 07-52-61= LDR 7

73-28-19= LDR 0

03-58-91= LDR 0

Sets A B are flowing

SET C not flowing in both

column so we do'nt use.

Notice those pairs showed

up.

Reply #34

Blackapple — Tue, 31 Jan 2006 13:29:49 GMT

We had 5,8,2 out at nite

recently Pa.nite 1/20-1/26

here is what followed after 073

Tue, Jan 24, 20062-9-4

Mon, Jan 23, 20065-8-2

Sun, Jan 22, 20061-9-6

Sat, Jan 21, 20066-2-9

Fri, Jan 20, 20065-5-2

Thu, Jan 19, 20067-9-1

Wed, Jan 18, 20060-7-3

07----73

43 43

40 16

07----73

34 34

31 07

Just add do'nt carry results

40-31-16-07

***************************

Now subtract

07----73 43 4... [ More ]

Reply #33

Blackapple — Tue, 31 Jan 2006 13:25:22 GMT

Search feature not good

You want the right spacing

147 or 365

258 476

369 587

470 698

581 etc. likewise

692

703

etc. etc.

Ideal digits out could be 689,896,698 etc.

Mirror combos(as 3 digits out) and other

combos not seen above

does'nt work as well.

Reply #32

Blackapple — Tue, 31 Jan 2006 13:07:31 GMT

BA goin teach yall some things

first its best to wait for ideal

3 missing digits Pa. nite 1/26-2/1

Check this out

Reply #31

Blackapple — Tue, 31 Jan 2006 12:41:51 GMT

Riddle for Sandy or Undress

Reply #30

four4me — Tue, 31 Jan 2006 06:58:01 GMT

Bob read first post on this topic #12 is the power number.

Reply #29

BobP — Tue, 31 Jan 2006 06:45:03 GMT

If you play around with different ways you will almost always find a way to hit something, but it won't play at a profit. The key to a system like this would be a method to generate the power number. Where does the 12 come from?

BobP

Reply #28

Raven62 — Tue, 31 Jan 2006 02:36:19 GMT

Interesting to note: The orginal workup of 046 (14 days ago) had 158 straight

Reply #27

mglsr — Tue, 31 Jan 2006 01:33:17 GMT

Let's try one more draw (Tues.):310 - 710 - 320 - 720 - 430 - 530 - 630 - 730 - 830 - 930 - 640 - 740 - 750 - 760 - 870 - 970 - 721 - 641 - 732 - 642 - 742 - 752 - 762 - 872 - 972 - 643 - 654 - 764 - 864 - 964

Reply #26

fast eddie — Tue, 31 Jan 2006 01:25:42 GMT

Ok, this will be my last post on lottery post, before I leave. :) I will miss it here! :) But, don't worry, I will be back in xmas.

Reply #25

mglsr — Tue, 31 Jan 2006 01:21:15 GMT

158 bx pacattack05

Reply #24

pacattack05 — Mon, 30 Jan 2006 23:05:26 GMT

I'm liking the 763 alot. I have no idea why.

Reply #23

pacattack05 — Mon, 30 Jan 2006 22:59:39 GMT

Good choice. Any fine tuning can only help. Crossing my eyes, shoulders and fingers. LOL

Reply #22

mglsr — Mon, 30 Jan 2006 22:33:04 GMT

ok pacattack05, since we're testing i want to add these for the test; (notice your numbers are in here also). 520 - 430 - 850 - 760 - 521 - 431 - 851 - 761 - 432 - 532 - 542 - 652 - 752 - 852 - 952 - 762 - 543 - 643 - 743 - 843 - 943 - 853 - 763 - 854 - 764 - 765 - 865 - 875 - 985 - 876 - 976

Reply #21

Blackapple — Mon, 30 Jan 2006 20:30:39 GMT

I have the other...... , although 12 is not the only power number, .Sandy,Undress tell the folks.Tell the membersPM me Cashman87Thank you C.It works more oftenthe pair part.Synchronizing it withother methods.

Reply #20

Raven62 — Mon, 30 Jan 2006 15:32:46 GMT

Florida01/20 364: 487, 486, 476, 876, 245, 242, 252 no hits01/27 253: 376, 375, 365, 765, 134, 131, 14101/28 943: 065, 055, 655, 823, 821, 831, 231

Reply #19

mymonie — Mon, 30 Jan 2006 15:00:45 GMT

Thanks Cashman your post will be missed around here. Drop in and see us when you can.

Reply #18

pacattack05 — Mon, 30 Jan 2006 14:40:07 GMT

Let's see for tonight's Florida. Last night it was 464.46+12=5864+12=7646-12=3464-12=52So, 5876, and 3452587-586-576-876-345-342-352-452

Reply #17

Snakeyes — Mon, 30 Jan 2006 14:27:15 GMT

Seems to work for Ohio through backtesting.

Reply #16

Amazing Grace — Mon, 30 Jan 2006 13:42:07 GMT

Did back testing in WC works great for pairs within a few days in most cases will be doing more backtesting.Thanks for info.May the force be with you.

Reply #15

Zoozie — Mon, 30 Jan 2006 12:14:44 GMT

Remember - Cashman was breaking it down into pairs. His example in original post: Pluses 9097minuses 6673, and then put them both together like this90976673 I backtested this and when broke into pairs like he was doing generated more hits that waiting on the actual number to show.90*97*66*73*There's your pairs. He was playing 40 combinations each time.See ya Cashman

Reply #14

DEB* — Mon, 30 Jan 2006 11:42:24 GMT

Thanks for the info Cashman87. This looks interesting. Will have to try it out. I enjoyed reading your post. You will be missed.Deb

Reply #13

pacattack05 — Mon, 30 Jan 2006 11:08:07 GMT

Thanx Raven62. Did not know that.

Reply #12

Raven62 — Mon, 30 Jan 2006 11:03:58 GMT

Lottery MathNumbers wrap instead of going above 9 or below 0, and no carries to next position.4-5=99+4=3

Reply #11

pacattack05 — Mon, 30 Jan 2006 10:50:15 GMT

I like the way you did 4-12=92I didn't know what to do in that case, but you've cleared that up. Thanx.I did it as 4-12=negative 08.I see a bunch of hits. Thanx for the heads up.

Reply #10

pacattack05 — Mon, 30 Jan 2006 10:33:57 GMT

I saw another with 957.next day was 634.957....95+12=10757+12=6995-12=8357-12=45So, 107698345......see the 634 in there

Reply #9

Raven62 — Mon, 30 Jan 2006 10:33:40 GMT

Their may be more hits using your numbers.1658 play 156, 158, 168, 5681634 play 134, 136, 146, 346or04-12=92, 46-12=349234 play 234, 239, 249, 349

Reply #8

csfb — Mon, 30 Jan 2006 10:30:28 GMT

Cashman, hate to see you go. Have a good one. Be safe.