Lottosync V1.7 - is it fixed?

Reply #23

RJOh — Sun, 05 Feb 2006 18:13:38 GMT

A lottery program that could generate thousands of systems for all drawings and calculate their percent of success in past drawings might be of some value, especially for jackpot style games. If a system has worked several times on past drawings, it likely to work again in the future and in jackpot games most players are happy to hit the jackpot once in a life time. The system one use just has to be affordable so one could play it every drawing until it hit again.

Reply #22

LANTERN — Sun, 05 Feb 2006 06:03:07 GMT

There have been a couple of lottery programs that generate hundreds even thousands of systems against the next draw and after tell you which ones were the most successful. Of course those same successful systems don't win the next time, but it gets me to wonder how it would be if these were real systems like gail howard chart picks, etc. instead of simple one up one down systems

Yes, that program for the most part at least on the pick 3 (I never used it for any other game) is junk, there a... [ More ]

Reply #21

BobP — Sun, 05 Feb 2006 05:11:49 GMT

There have been a couple of lottery programs that generate hundreds even thousands of systems against the next draw and after tell you which ones were the most successful. Of course those same successful systems don't win the next time, but it gets me to wonder how it would be if these were real systems like gail howard chart picks, etc. instead of simple one up one down systems and such. It would be interesting to see if any system were better at picking all the winning numbers. Lottery Di... [ More ]

Reply #20

RJOh — Sat, 04 Feb 2006 21:18:51 GMT

I doubt if Lottosync V1.7 is broke. Can it be improved? Maybe. If the fact that a lottery program can't pick a winner is an indication that it is broke, then all lottery programs are broke.

Lottery programs are tools. Are they tools that will help a player win? Maybe. Should programmers sell lottery programs that can't help a player win? Why not if players already know that programs don't work and still want to buy one anyway.

Players need some one to blame when they lose their... [ More ]

Reply #19

LANTERN — Sat, 04 Feb 2006 21:15:09 GMT

The rules of a game are dicided by the past draws of that game, so no STATIC system or method will ever work as well as a DYNAMIC system or method, the past draws' history for a particular state must constantly be SCANNED for changes in the Rules , what worked 2 weeks ago, might not be working this week, even for the very same day draw and the same state, this is why many or most Static systems fail, also they don't take into account different day draws different segments of time, lik... [ More ]

Reply #18

hypersoniq — Sat, 04 Feb 2006 20:19:09 GMT

as was the Boeing 777

Reply #17

time*treat — Sat, 04 Feb 2006 19:20:34 GMT

The strange attractor can be thought of as a bias (point, region, or area) in n-space. Nothing proprietary there.

If anyone knows what this program's flaw is, I'm sure it can be either fixed, or have it's output fed into another program to cure what ails it.

Some of the ideas and filters (in this arena) are in direct opposition to each other. You can see that by some of the conflict that shows up when a method works for some places and not others. One faction will swear by it, and anot... [ More ]

Reply #16

RJOh — Sat, 04 Feb 2006 18:33:14 GMT

In the MadDog's PB/MM challenges no one person is a consistent winner so knowing how they got lucky once in a while might not be of much help. If any of the participants start hitting 3+0 or better consistently then that person might be on to something.

Reply #15

hypersoniq — Sat, 04 Feb 2006 18:05:32 GMT

I have developed failed systems on the forums (most recently soniq boom for pick3/4) but I know they don't work... a simple circular reference error made me believe it was better than it actually was... developing out in the open allowed a few fresh pairs of eyes to see the error. I know these systems don't work, and I know I don't have any edge alone... so why not openly develop stuff with a group of like-minded experimenters in an open forum... we KNOW nothing works, so why put a pricetag on... [ More ]

Reply #14

popeye — Sat, 04 Feb 2006 17:08:20 GMT

Good argument Hyer. So, all he needs to do to make it all go away is post here saying that he

cannot make it work to the reliabilty he stated and he has no more time to work on it any more.

End of story - no need to check for it on the forums.

And, if ver 7 is flawed (by his own admission) , he shouldn't be selling it.

It would be nice if he did allow one to get the source code but I don't think this is going to happen. Very few developers have ever done this.

Reply #13

hypersoniq — Sat, 04 Feb 2006 16:51:18 GMT

no software developer has ever sold a winning lottery system ever in the history of lottery software... ever

why should guru/marco be held to a higher standard? deep down y'all knew it wasn't going to work... you could have version 9.5 and it still won't work with any regularity... it's the nature of the beast.

If you spent money, you should ask (nicely) that if he is no longer developing that maybe he can give you the source code so you can fix it yourself.

I too am involved in the se... [ More ]

Reply #12

paul762 — Sat, 04 Feb 2006 15:59:21 GMT

Here's my opinion, I think by still selling V1.7 that we know and he knows doesnt work, just proves that it is/was all a big con, I just kick myself for not realising it sooner.

Reply #11

vick — Sat, 04 Feb 2006 04:37:37 GMT

If he want's to left be alone then why did the last time he spoke here he said he was working on the new version and he continues to sell 1.7 on site? But hey all the power to him if he can sell more and also develop it even further.

Reply #10

LANTERN — Fri, 03 Feb 2006 21:09:10 GMT

Vick and Paul

I might be wrong, but it seems to me that the more that we ask Marco to come out here and or give us an update, the farther away that he goes and the longer that he stays away.

Maybe he wants to be left alone.

Reply #9

paul762 — Fri, 03 Feb 2006 20:59:09 GMT

Lantern - are you reading the right topic ???? nobody said anything about forcing anyone to do anything

Reply #8

Spot9 — Fri, 03 Feb 2006 20:11:22 GMT

I think Marco knows in his heart of hearts that this is not the way to treat

your customers who have bought your software.

spot9

Reply #7

vick — Fri, 03 Feb 2006 18:47:46 GMT

forcing? who said anything about forcing, communicating would be nice though.

Reply #6

LANTERN — Fri, 03 Feb 2006 09:06:29 GMT

Neither Marco nor anybody else can be forced to do anything that he or they don't want to do.

Leave Marco alone. He can't be forced to give any new versions, not even to fix any old-ones.

If he does, then he will in his own time.

Reply #5

vick — Thu, 02 Feb 2006 21:58:10 GMT

i don't think he could be that cruel and not inform us

Reply #4

paul762 — Thu, 02 Feb 2006 21:56:24 GMT

No , im thinking its a new fixed V1.7 or probably the V1.8 we were supposed to get and he's left the original buyers high and dry.

Reply #3

vick — Thu, 02 Feb 2006 18:40:40 GMT

i got 1.7 as a free upgrade from 1.6, you must have also Paul or are you thinking that his 1.7 on his sell page is a different build version of 1.7 ????? Either way Marco should really step in here and respond unless of course he's with his girlfriend

Reply #2

paul762 — Thu, 02 Feb 2006 13:59:23 GMT

I wonder if anyone has purchased it recently and can enlighten us

Reply #1

vick — Wed, 01 Feb 2006 22:42:52 GMT

he's always been selling 1.7 since he released it

Lottosync V1.7 - is it fixed?

paul762 — Wed, 01 Feb 2006 19:10:41 GMT

just went to the lottosync website and they are selling V1.7 - Marco does this mean its fixed