CA SLP

Reply #5

ryanm — Fri, 03 Mar 2006 19:24:40 GMT

Quote: Originally posted by Just6ntlc on February 3, 2006Quote: Originally posted by JimmySand9 on February 2, 2006Having ball drawings for all their games is the obvious "should", but it's not going to happen. What could happen is a return to the classic 6/51 Super Lotto, or an even bigger long shot, the return of the Lotto 6/49.

Here's the problem JimmySand9, CA's population is at 37+ million and CA SLP Jackpot odds are at 41.5 million to 1. That's why CA should keep the 5+1 bonus game. If... [ More ]

Reply #4

CASH Only — Fri, 03 Mar 2006 19:14:09 GMT

I like the idea of CA going back to a 6/x format. IHO 6/59 would work well.

Reply #3

Just6ntlc — Fri, 03 Feb 2006 19:30:40 GMT

Here's the problem JimmySand9, CA's population is at 37+ million and CA SLP Jackpot odds are at 41.5 million to 1. That's why CA should keep the 5+1 bonus game. If they go back to 6/49 or 6/51, more people will keep winning. I want computerized drawings OUT. I would suggest CA SLP increase the odds of winning the jackpot by increasing a few WBs, but keep odds of winning at around 1 in 25.

Reply #2

ryanm — Thu, 02 Feb 2006 17:02:47 GMT

Yeah, CA should revert to the classic straight pick 6 game. Powerball and Mega Millions pretty much have saturated the pick 5+1 market.

Reply #1

JimmySand9 — Thu, 02 Feb 2006 16:04:48 GMT

Having ball drawings for all their games is the obvious should , but it's not going to happen. What could happen is a return to the classic 6/51 Super Lotto, or an even bigger long shot, the return of the Lotto 6/49.

CA SLP

Just6ntlc — Wed, 01 Feb 2006 20:51:34 GMT

My vote is to eliminate all computerized drawings. What should CA do next with their lotto games